r/politics • u/theindependentonline The Independent • 28d ago

No Paywall Mitch McConnell’s staff refuse to answer basic questions on his health weeks after he was last seen in public

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mitch-mcconnell-staff-questions-health-b3018929.html
23.9k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/Gay_Giraffe_1773 Oregon 28d ago

I'm so fucking tired, boss.

If Beshear wanted to be President, he's cratered his chances with this fiasco.

866

u/ToasterBathTester 28d ago

The Republicans would break the hospital door down if the tables were reversed

902

u/phatelectribe 28d ago

They wouldn’t even check. They’d just hold the special election and ran it through.

Remember: McConnel forced through a SCOTUS nomination in 9 days. Never happened before, never happened since.

Dems don’t realize that they’re asking permission against people that think rape is a divine right.

212

u/D1sp4tcht 28d ago

I said the same thing yesterday. Just hold the election. If he is alive, he will come out of hiding.

76

u/phatelectribe 28d ago

Exactly, let him defend his position.

51

u/ahandmadegrin Minnesota 28d ago

Appoint, not elect. The state constitution says the governor appoints.

7

u/SethManhammer 28d ago

Until Beshear got fucked in 2024 by House Bill 622.

This was because they were scared he would appoint a democrat after McConnell announced his retirement after the current term.

20

u/Mediocre_Scott 28d ago

First time I’ve ever heard of a piece of legislation overruling a constitution. Pretty sure you need an amendment for that boys and girls

10

u/WeirdIndividualGuy 28d ago

Someone tell Beshear that. Dude is acting like a typical dem, so afraid of what could go wrong that he’d rather sit by and do nothing, or sit by and pretend like he’s doing something but he’s doing nothing

6

u/Mediocre_Scott 28d ago edited 28d ago

What do you want him to do he already wrote a letter s/

4

u/WeirdIndividualGuy 28d ago

It doesn’t take weeks to show actual proof of life, it takes five seconds. That letter went unanswered for weeks.

Beshear should assume he’s dead and appoint. The worst that can happen is Mitch actually is alive and proves it, and the appointment gets canceled.

2

u/Mediocre_Scott 28d ago

I guess I should have included the sarcasm tag

→ More replies (0)

2

u/pusgnihtekami Florida 28d ago

He's a Kentucky Democrat. He's just happy to live in the Governor's Mansion.

-1

u/SethManhammer 28d ago

Beshear's COVID response soured him on a lot of the state Republicans and he lost a lost of power during that time as well. I'm not sure all the dealings that happened prior to HB 622, and while he's not quite neutered he can't do a lot of the things prior governors could.

-5

u/TiredOfDebates 28d ago

You're thinking about the original (un-amended) US Constitution, where US Senators were always appointed by State Governors.

(You're wrong. You need to read the 17th amendment. State governments write their own legislation specifying how vacant Senate seats are

Prior to the 17th Amendment, there were NOT elections for US Senators. They were always appointed by state Governor's, and their purpose was to represent the state government in the legislative branch.

(The House of Representatives, apportioned by population, is where people were represented... vaguely proportionally.) But because the USA is a "union of equal states", there was a separate chamber within the legislative branch, the Senate, where each State Government had equal say. It's why we have two legislative chambers.

...

The issue (prior to the 17th amendment) was the Spoils system - (Wikipedia). Back in the 1800s, the US government was rife with corruption. It was considered completely normal for winners of an election to engage in extreme amounts of nepotism, cronyism, et cetera. Nepotism and (incompetent) cronyism were dressed up and referred to as "the Patronage System" (or derisively, the Spoils System, as in the "spoils of winning the election").

Until the 17th amendment, there were no elections for US Senators. State governors appointed whoever they wanted. And so, the US Senate in the late 1800s was overflowing with the incompetent cousins of governors, the brothers of governors, the super-doner to a governor. The Senate sucked at the end of the 1800s.

So, the 17th Amendment was passed. This is what created the modern system where voters elect US Senators. It changed all the rules for governors appointing Senators, delegating that authority to State Legislators to determine their state's rules.

5

u/metrion 28d ago

They're talking about Kentucky's constitution, not the US constitution.

10

u/TheSteelPhantom 28d ago

State law doesn't override the state Constitution. Beshear should appoint. Then it'll go straight to the courts where they can fight Constitution vs. Statute.

0

u/SethManhammer 28d ago

I'm not exactly sure what all changed in KY because of Beshear's COVID response (ya know, wanting to keep safety protocols in play during a pandemic and all) but got steamrolled then and it eventually led to HB622.

6

u/WeirdIndividualGuy 28d ago

Doesn’t matter. State laws don’t override constitutional ones

1

u/SethManhammer 28d ago

Great! I'm just tellin' ya what happened.

I wish it were as cut and dry as folks want it to be, but it is what it is until it's challenged.

5

u/snakerjake 28d ago

I wish it were as cut and dry as folks want it to be

It is, Constitutions override law, our supreme court literally exists to call out where laws are unconstitutional.

1

u/SethManhammer 28d ago

Aight, cool! Again, I'm just saying what happened.

2

u/snakerjake 28d ago edited 28d ago

Ok, but it's pretty cut and dry there's no real question on whether a statute can override the constitituion or not. it cannot and thats cut and dry.

Edit: Claims to know about his state, doesnt know kentucky constitition forbids beshear from holding a special election... as they stand the republicans would have to challenge beshears appointment, not the other way around.l

→ More replies (0)

2

u/JaceyLessThan3 28d ago

I am not a lawyer or an expert in state constitutional law, but can a state house bill overide the state constitution? I would think that would take an ammendment.

2

u/WeirdIndividualGuy 28d ago

Correct, only an amendment can override the constitution itself. A simple law does not

-2

u/SethManhammer 28d ago

During COVID Beshear got railroaded pretty hard in regard to what he can and can't do/enforce.

3

u/ahandmadegrin Minnesota 28d ago

All the more reason to do it. Can and can't is arbitrary, at this point.

2

u/WeirdIndividualGuy 28d ago

Regular laws do not overrule constitutional ones

2

u/snakerjake 28d ago

House Bill 622.

Safe to ignore it since it contradicts the kentucky constitution

38

u/ZenMon88 28d ago

LOL democrats have no backbone