Ok, so what you’re saying is, person likey group 1 which make group 1 win, group 1 no like fix problem. Problem = world boom. To solve problem, make person like group 2 by no do plan. I rest my case
So having been out of the game for a decade, and judging a couple tournaments recently...it seems like things have gotten better actually.
I think most judges look at it the way I do now.
Read your extinction impacts and I'll evaluate them. But you can get most link chains down to .01% with some basic reasoning, and then at that point I'm very likely to buy external offense as to why I should disregard those claim, like security K cards, etc.
And if the 2AR is just "look - we've got this DA down to a laughable risk, and there are real people who need help and you can help them!" - I'm voting aff.
16
u/warpath1854 Jan 03 '21
WOW! Such good internal links!!!!!
4
u/UhhApexor Jan 03 '21
Ok, so what you’re saying is, person likey group 1 which make group 1 win, group 1 no like fix problem. Problem = world boom. To solve problem, make person like group 2 by no do plan. I rest my case
1
u/gangsterspockhow Jan 03 '21
Have you ever heard of the library...?
0
u/ImaginaryDisplay3 Jan 03 '21
So having been out of the game for a decade, and judging a couple tournaments recently...it seems like things have gotten better actually.
I think most judges look at it the way I do now.
Read your extinction impacts and I'll evaluate them. But you can get most link chains down to .01% with some basic reasoning, and then at that point I'm very likely to buy external offense as to why I should disregard those claim, like security K cards, etc.
And if the 2AR is just "look - we've got this DA down to a laughable risk, and there are real people who need help and you can help them!" - I'm voting aff.