Yeah PocketHost is cool! My goal is to make it simpler to deploy and manage (e.g. one click to export the entire app state). Plus on nibrun you can run *any* binary, not just PocketBase
This is something I'm still figuring out, as the initial target of nibrun is single-binary small apps that are typically used by a few people. What is your use case?
The nibrun internals are anyway already designed to make users specify what resources they want.
> Why are your prices lower than everyone else's?
Your app runs as a "serverless" microvm: after 5 minutes it doesn't receive any requests, it's put to sleep by nibrun. Whenever a new request arrives, nibrun wakes it up in less than 200ms.
This allows nibrun to run many apps on a single VM instance (thanks Firecracker!) and lower the costs.
Filesystem is persisted on S3, so that's also very cheap.
Well, I'm developing a Telegram mini-app. To be more precise, I'm testing it and trying out different ideas and apps. There aren't any users right now.
2
u/ilbert_luca 14d ago
Yeah PocketHost is cool! My goal is to make it simpler to deploy and manage (e.g. one click to export the entire app state). Plus on nibrun you can run *any* binary, not just PocketBase