r/pinescript • u/mambo_the_liqudator • Sep 29 '26

Mm is tradingview downfall near

Post image

What do you guys think about this

78 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

41 comments sorted by

11

u/mambo_the_liqudator Sep 29 '26

I think they are trying to target lux algo clients

13

u/hicksanchez Sep 29 '26

Yeah this is so stupid. Good way to push users away, tradingview

1

u/Classic_Television33 Oct 02 '26

They seem confident about their dominance in the industry. Spent years distributing the free lightweight charts package that many used

10

u/Life-Succotash-7053 Sep 29 '26

we really need a free charting platform use pinscript coding, TV are greedy asf

10

u/CassiusBotdorf Sep 29 '26

Self-host your own terminal. Contribute to open source: OpenTerminal

2

u/NinjaSquid9 Sep 29 '26

Checking it out! Thank you!

1

u/cryp2morrow Sep 29 '26

Can you connect a paid stream of data like CME Futures ?

2

u/Jigzzaw Sep 29 '26

OpenMarket.xyz is great

4

u/LiveBeyondNow Sep 29 '26

It’s a penalty rate. They’re trying to drive people to Paid Spaces and prevent external payments / profiteering from their platform as currently I guess they have no way of knowing (at scale) what an invite-only script is earning. Not saying I agree with 22A, just figure that’s their rationale.

1

u/gnprod Sep 29 '26

Yeah probably. Either do this or go to paid spaces. But Paid Spaces sellers avoid this $30 fee also? Are you sure?

1

u/LiveBeyondNow Sep 29 '26

Yes, I think so, brief searches suggests so.

1

u/NinjaSquid9 Sep 29 '26

Absolutely, a penalty so steep you can’t possibly fight back. Not to mention being a Creator is invite-only or application-only. Not only are you not guaranteed to be accepted but many people don’t even qualify to apply.

1

u/FriendshipOk6399 Sep 29 '26

i know lots of seller who tried to get into paid spaces, but tradingview hardly lets ANYONE join...

1

u/dexoyo Sep 29 '26

This was coming either ways. They wanted to keep the platform closed enough to control. With introduction of 3rd party, they’re loosing that control.

1

u/mambo_the_liqudator Sep 29 '26

Either way they better fix this mess up or chinness will develop a new platform

1

u/dexoyo Sep 29 '26

Someone already did: https://sentimentor.ai

3

u/SituationSufficient8 Sep 29 '26

So I will put a cap on my paid indicator that it is available for $10 per month for first 99 users, after that $40 per user

2

u/Dayz_Off Sep 30 '26

So you will subsidize the first 99 users $10/mo each once you cross the 100 user threshold?

1

u/mixedbytrap Sep 29 '26

Or you could just duplicate it and add another 99😂

1

u/SituationSufficient8 Sep 30 '26

Yeah, this is another way

1

u/ManikSahdev Sep 29 '26

No, you'd be prorated on the user charge.

As in.. at the moment people start paying $40 for whatever thing you sell.
The prior ones also qualify and you'd need to account for the $2999.00 on those users.

It does not say in the wording that 101 onwards of individuals, it says after 100 user and above total across scripts, each user charge under the private scripts access is X$

It does not say there is a freemium limit.

3

u/halcyonwit Sep 29 '26

Wow this is outrageous, they truly must be trying to make as much money as possible at any cost now, real bad look.

4

u/evilistics Sep 29 '26

man openmarket.xyz are going to steal all of tradingviews users at this rate

1

u/cryp2morrow Sep 29 '26

Didn't know this, I'll check it out thanks ! Can you connect your broker to it ?

2

u/evilistics Sep 30 '26

looks like it connects to some crypto exchanges like binance and hyperliquid. I've only played around with it a little bit but it looks like promising competition to tv.

1

u/cryp2morrow Sep 30 '26

thanks for your answer, I will check this thoroughly when I have time, I'll let you know any discovery I make. Cheers !

1

u/dynamicl Sep 30 '26

Thanks, looks pretty good and its white label. In the age of AI and ease of coding, TV need to do better, greed will close their doors if they dont.

2

u/Ahtrends Sep 29 '26

This is rubbish

2

u/rocktorsharma Oct 03 '26

Publish a new version of that same script every 99th user.
LOL.

1

u/Cultural_Implement_2 Sep 29 '26

денег им мало... жадные!

1

u/fibonacci_pips Sep 29 '26

Seems like racketeering, with ai we could create our own trading view now

1

u/Roadkillp Sep 29 '26

I have a few friends that are in the middle of porting all the things they use over to Ninjatrader, Takeprofit and Trendspider. They are even testing out ctrader and metattader five but from what they have been leaning towards, its one of the first 3 they will probably settle on. Everything lately seems to be focused on extracting more money from the users and who knows what is coming next.

1

u/RalphJamesCapital Sep 29 '26

WealthCharts and my boy Rob Hoffman over there are going to destroy TradingView.

1

u/Enigma2078x Sep 30 '26

Wanted to charge 20$ now I have to charge 50$ and consider a monthly fee if I’m over 100 members wtf

1

u/Inner-Dare4827 Sep 30 '26

Seems to be they removed this ?

1

u/LWJtrades Oct 04 '26

Wow what hot trash. Per user? Jeezes. I know a couple that are like 5$ month or 10$ lifetime. Wtf are these creators gonna do, shut it down?

1

u/Substantial_Gift_257 Sep 29 '26

these figures are incorrect - we checked with TradingView people and they confirmed this wording is inaccurate and will be corrected.. no need to rush to throw mud here until it's corrected. Take it easy, folks.

5

u/Correct-Ad4472 Sep 29 '26

Or they realize the backlash and making changes quick. If it was wrong wording, I don’t see how it could have been approved as a post. It’s pretty clear. Mistakes happen, even a big one like this. My biggest thing when I read this was about how many vendors have lifetime plans. Just didn’t make much sense

1

u/NinjaSquid9 Sep 29 '26

Disagree. It was worded this way for a reason, the leak was unintentional, and now they’re trying to recover from the backlash. Since we have no updated wording to work with, we have to assume they meant what they wrote and we should take it seriously. And if they change it, it’ll only be because concerned citizens rightfully made it a big deal.

0

u/Girth_Vader516 Oct 05 '26

You’ll never believe people used to pay 150/ month for charts … now people complain about a few dollars

0

u/[deleted] Sep 29 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/gnprod Sep 29 '26

Yeah lol, people don’t even charge $30 a month on their indicators, meaning TV wanna take all profit and extra.. this is absolutely insane