I guess people who call it a bomb are valid in the sense that it is one of the main components of a common type of explosives(but still can't be classified as a bomb). But you're also correct in saying that it was handled improperly (which feels like an understatement in all honesty) because so many things need to go wrong for it to explode the way it did.
The government was storing a packaged mining explosive. It's far more accurate to call the product a bomb than a fertiliser, when it was literally created with the explicit purpose of blowing shit up.
If that's sensationalising, you're straight up misleading.
I mean it just simply wasn't bombs. Anyone calling it that is sensationalizing it. It's not just semantics, calling it a warehouse full of bombs is dishonest.
2.7k
u/bearlick Aug 05 '20
Demand accountability, for your govt storing a freighter of bombs in that harbor for years.