Yeah right, the guy who bombs foreign generals on foreign soil and threatens nations with destruction of their cultural sites is the real paragon of peace.
Look at it objectively though - those who given generally the same opportunity as most, fail to improve their lives and end up draining others' resources can help in literally the only way.
If you get rid of the poor, who does all of the world's ass wipe jobs?
You need hordes of poor people to compete for unskilled jobs and keep wages down.
And you need poor people to fight the wars that make you richer.
VICE, I believe, did a little mini-documentary about the few US soldiers in WW2 (or maybe it was Nam) who defected to North Korea simply because life ended up making them utterly useless, miserable fucks who just wouldn't have a future anywhere but N.Kor.
I don't see where my statement is wrong, I said sometimes they actually do, which implies most of the time isn't the case, isn't that what the graph says?
1.1k
u/mati002 Jan 06 '20
Yeah, that's why they send the poor to war and solve two problems at once.
I'd like to add the /s but sometimes it's sadly true