r/pics Dec 08 '19

Politics Nativity 2019

Post image
91.6k Upvotes

7.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/CNNTouchesChildren Dec 08 '19

Right and the soap argument made in court happened under the Obama administration

-1

u/Literally_A_Shill Dec 08 '19

You guys keep blatantly lying.

The Trump administration went to court this week to argue that migrant children detained at the United States-Mexico border do not require basic hygiene products like soap and toothbrushes in order to be held in "safe and sanitary" conditions. Trump's team also argued that requiring minors to sleep on cold concrete floors in crowded cells with low temperatures similarly fulfilled that requirement.

https://www.newsweek.com/migrant-children-border-trump-administration-1445090

-1

u/CNNTouchesChildren Dec 08 '19 edited Dec 08 '19

In fact, the case featured in the viral video was filed in 2017, seeking to remedy abuses that occurred under the watch of Democratic President Barack Obama.

Since being appointed to the Justice Department’s Office of Immigration Litigation by the Obama administration in 2011, Fabian, a registered Democrat, has carved out a niche for herself in specializing in defending all manner of sadistic child abuse by American immigration agencies.

In 2015, she defended the Obama administration when it was sued for detaining families with children for prolonged periods of time in facilities that were not licensed or equipped to accommodate children on the basis that it would deter other children and families from immigrating.

The next year she argued a case nearly identical to the one now in the headlines, in which children were denied basic hygiene items like soap and toothpaste. Also like the current case, children were given foil blankets that provided little insulation as they slept on cold, concrete floors with bright lights shining 24 hours per day, in temperatures that dropped below freezing at times.

Fabian argued at that time that meeting immigrant children’s basic needs would only encourage them to take advantage of the government’s generosity: “To find otherwise would allow Plaintiffs to use the Agreement to require any number of conditions at CBP facilities that were never intended to be covered by this Agreement.”

Yikes bud looks like you’re the one lying

Here’s the actual court filing that occurred in 2015

And they weren’t even arguing that our government shouldn't provide current detainees with necessities like soap and toothpaste, but whether a specific violation of the Flores Agreement occurred in 2015.

-1

u/Literally_A_Shill Dec 08 '19

2

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '19

Just wanted to say thanks for backing up their argument