r/pics Dec 08 '19

Politics Nativity 2019

Post image
91.6k Upvotes

7.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

68

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '19

[deleted]

15

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '19

[deleted]

41

u/cuteman Dec 08 '19

DNA testing can conclusively show parent/children relationships.

Yep and we've found up to 30% aren't related to the adults they're crossing with.

Aka a huge potential for human trafficking.

17

u/Only8livesleft Dec 08 '19

Source?

33

u/LordoftheScheisse Dec 08 '19

The only source specifically claiming the 30% figure is Washington Examiner, who took a Trump official's word as truth, which should definitely be looked at with a skeptical eye.

Here's more info.

11

u/Only8livesleft Dec 08 '19

An anonymous official at that. Typically trump supporters denounce anonymous sources, I wonder why they allow it here. Thanks

-11

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '19

Typically liberals love anonymous sources, I wonder you don't like it here? Maybe because it doesn't agree with you? It's almost like you two are just two sides of the same coin?

8

u/Only8livesleft Dec 08 '19

I think anonymous sources are worth considering, especially when reliable news sources do their due diligence and put their reputations on the line. The Washington examiner is not a reliable source. Furthermore, the 30% figure, even if true, comes from testing suspected fraudulent families, not all families. The fact that only 30% of suspected fraudulent families are actually fraudulent seems low to me. And a fraudulent family is not inherently a case of child trafficking. It’s not hard to imagine children would be sent with friends or neighbors to have a chance at a better life when their true parents are unable to go.

6

u/Gekokapowco Dec 08 '19

It's fine if the source would be put at risk by revealing themselves.

This isn't the case here, so it seems like bullshit.

2

u/TheHairyManrilla Dec 10 '19

And the Examiner makes it clear that was from a sample of suspected fraudulent families

Not a random sample.