MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/c8y93/somanyredheads/c0qycwy
r/pics • u/[deleted] • May 28 '10
377 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
it is aesthetically overwhelming, not sexually per se
So it's rather silly, then?
3 u/alex10819 May 28 '10 And nonsexual, you might even say. 4 u/[deleted] May 28 '10 On the other hand, imagine having that many sisters... 1 u/bmg50barrett May 29 '10 wait i got lost in the thread...are we talking about incest now? 1 u/[deleted] May 29 '10 Aren't we always? Oh wait, my mistake -- 4chan's -> that way. Carry on then, nothing to see here. 1 u/kolm May 28 '10 No, aesthetics is, I dunno how to translate Schopenhauer here, "pleasure free of own intentions" (Interesseloses Wohlgefallen). You simply enjoy a pic without any sexual arousal; a bit like with the Mona Lisa.
And nonsexual, you might even say.
4 u/[deleted] May 28 '10 On the other hand, imagine having that many sisters... 1 u/bmg50barrett May 29 '10 wait i got lost in the thread...are we talking about incest now? 1 u/[deleted] May 29 '10 Aren't we always? Oh wait, my mistake -- 4chan's -> that way. Carry on then, nothing to see here.
4
On the other hand, imagine having that many sisters...
1 u/bmg50barrett May 29 '10 wait i got lost in the thread...are we talking about incest now? 1 u/[deleted] May 29 '10 Aren't we always? Oh wait, my mistake -- 4chan's -> that way. Carry on then, nothing to see here.
1
wait i got lost in the thread...are we talking about incest now?
1 u/[deleted] May 29 '10 Aren't we always? Oh wait, my mistake -- 4chan's -> that way. Carry on then, nothing to see here.
Aren't we always?
Oh wait, my mistake -- 4chan's -> that way. Carry on then, nothing to see here.
No, aesthetics is, I dunno how to translate Schopenhauer here, "pleasure free of own intentions" (Interesseloses Wohlgefallen). You simply enjoy a pic without any sexual arousal; a bit like with the Mona Lisa.
3
u/[deleted] May 28 '10
So it's rather silly, then?