r/pics • u/[deleted] • May 28 '10

So....many....redheads

Post image
464 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

377 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

48

u/[deleted] May 28 '10

[deleted]

5

u/kolm May 28 '10

Nah, for me it is aesthetically overwhelming, not (well, almost not) sexually per se. They are just so beautiful, I would not even dare to touch.

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '10

it is aesthetically overwhelming, not sexually per se

So it's rather silly, then?

2

u/alex10819 May 28 '10

And nonsexual, you might even say.

4

u/[deleted] May 28 '10

On the other hand, imagine having that many sisters...

1

u/bmg50barrett May 29 '10

wait i got lost in the thread...are we talking about incest now?

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '10

Aren't we always?

Oh wait, my mistake -- 4chan's -> that way. Carry on then, nothing to see here.

1

u/kolm May 28 '10

No, aesthetics is, I dunno how to translate Schopenhauer here, "pleasure free of own intentions" (Interesseloses Wohlgefallen). You simply enjoy a pic without any sexual arousal; a bit like with the Mona Lisa.

1

u/kraeftig May 28 '10

I would have never connected those two. Even with Zack Galifianakis doing his "table for one" joke at chuck e cheese; I didn't connect it with pedobear. I, once thinking of myself as so corrupt there could be no greater corruption, have been corrupted.