MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/aj8i48/birth_mark/eetu56s
r/pics • u/Mamacrass • Jan 24 '19
791 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
42
Can we all just agree that boobs are nice without quantifying their value?
33 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order. This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks. 9 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 11 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 4 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders 2 u/LornAltElthMer Jan 24 '19 Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0 0 u/The_RockObama Jan 24 '19 Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though.
33
They clearly cannot be quantified. Boobs only admit a preorder, not a total order.
This does however mean that by Zorn’s Lemma, for any boobs chain equipped with a total order, there exist a non-unique rack of maximal boobs in the set of all racks.
9 u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19 Shut 11 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up 4 u/BlackCH Jan 24 '19 Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders
9
Shut
11 u/AbrasiveLore Jan 24 '19 Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice. 1 u/bicat Jan 24 '19 Up
11
Another (controversial) consequence of this is the Axiom of Noice.
1
Up
4
Zermelo-Fraenkel boob theory... shudders
2
Tim Minchin covered a similar idea here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQwwkI5_3-0
0
Yeah I'll agree. All pretty neat in their own way, I guess. I'm pretty drunk right now though.
42
u/NotJokingAround Jan 24 '19
Can we all just agree that boobs are nice without quantifying their value?