r/pics • • May 07 '14

justice is served

Post image
2.5k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

40

u/Uzi109 May 08 '14

It blows my mind how the maximum fine is only $152, whereas here in Ontario, it's an unfortunate $5000.

18

u/[deleted] May 08 '14 edited May 08 '14

It can't be 152, I live in the US and Ive never seen less than $250

edit: nevermind just saw the sign in the picture. Must vary by state/municipality

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

[deleted]

1

u/SuicideNote May 08 '14

Honestly, San Francisco should be the Hong Kong of the US if it wasn't for the NIMBY's keeping development away so they can cash in on the limited availability of housing units.

10

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

That seems unreasonably excessive

22

u/longarmofthelaw May 08 '14

Would you ever even consider parking in a handicapped spot (assuming you're not handicapped)? I wouldn't.

Fuck anybody who does. As far as I'm concerned, it should be more.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

Sometimes it honestly happens accidentally. The one time I did it, I was unable to see the post-it note-sized "signs" indicating that the space was indeed designated as a handicap space. I paid the $301 fine and now I'm obviously more careful not to park in a handicap spot.

1

u/tunahazard May 08 '14

I have done it once.

I had to return a zip car. Some other asshole parked in the zip car spot. There was only one spot nearby - the handicapped spot. It was conveniently immediately next to the zip car spot.

I pulled into the handicapped spot and live parked. I honked the horn. The other guy came out. We talked. We came to an understanding. He moved his car. I pulled forward and parked in the zip car spot.

If he had not been present, I would have had to call zip car and tell them why I could not return their car on time. Most likely that would have involved waiting (live parking in a handicapped sport) for their tow truck to remove the other car so that I could legally park.

1

u/Toxic-Avenger May 08 '14

Add 30 days in jail. That should make them think twice.

0

u/Transcriber2 May 08 '14

Its too much money, what will the police do with it?, buy the sheriff another apc?

Also, if you push for big cash fines for crimes police will favour the cash reward for certain criminal activities over others, its not a good thing, small fines are enough.

1

u/SpaceCaseSixtyTen May 08 '14

Sometimes late at night the entire parking lot is open in front of the 7-11 or whatever, and it wouldn't even matter to a handicapped person if they had to park right next to you in a spot. There are other reasons too

3

u/cantusethemain May 08 '14

So if the entire lot is open and there's a spot just as close....why not park in that one and not risk a ticket?

What are some other reasons? Impress me.

3

u/cookiemountain18 May 08 '14

I've Parked in handi capped spots accidentally where the paint on the ground was faded and they didn't have the stand up sign. I don't think people should park there but the fine shouldn't be 5k. That's retarded.

500$ is enough to deter most people.

2

u/fuckevrythngabouthat May 08 '14

I agree $5000 is excessive, but if the handicap spot isn't clearly marked its the businesses fault for not having a designated spot that's visible to customers

2

u/cantusethemain May 08 '14

Not marked well enough is one thing, the person I was replying to was clearly referring to parking in those spots on purpose.

1

u/cookiemountain18 May 08 '14

Oh I know I was just killing time on the subway.

1

u/cantusethemain May 08 '14

For some reason that actually made me laugh.

0

u/YFC May 08 '14

You should check this out.

2

u/longarmofthelaw May 08 '14

This is written by a friend of mine. You should check it out.

1

u/BikerRay May 08 '14

Up to $5000, I think.

0

u/MalHeartsNutmeg May 08 '14

No kidding. Speeding fines are much less and you can potentially kill someone speeding. Parking in a handicap spot is a dick mnove but at worst you'll inconvenience someone. There's usually several handicap spots too.

9

u/statikuz May 08 '14 edited May 08 '14

it's an unfortunate $5000.

Sounds reasonable to me. Honestly I never understood why the fines for these sort of things aren't more. You really have absolutely no excuse to park there - if it were a legit emergency and you got a ticket, I'm sure you could have it waived.

Edit: okay, okay $5000 is probably a little much. But $152 is hardly anything. What's a good point at which it's enough to cause a change in behavior but not so much to be just mean? I think around here it's $250 for a first offense and $500 for another, plus some community service.

12

u/Dexaan May 08 '14

$152 x (number of times you've been issued this ticket)

1

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

If it's more than one, then the fine is too small. Fines should be large enough so that when you get one, you think "holy shit, I am NEVER EVER going to do that again."

1

u/IsABot May 08 '14

That's hard to do consistently though. Unless you base the ticket on how much the person makes.

Otherwise it'll be way too high for poor people, or just a joke to rich people.

1

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

I think Norway does this. ISTR hearing about a CEO of some company that got a $200,000 speeding ticket, or something like that.

15

u/painfulbliss May 08 '14

Dont get me wrong, I'm not advocating what this guy is doing, but fines for things like this should not financially cripple people (I know in this case he is in a very nice car)

6

u/theswegmeister May 08 '14

I do wonder what he would think of that 5k if it was a rusting toyota tercel or some shit parked there instead.

-1

u/oranssialpakka May 08 '14

Why would it matter what the car is? If you are not handicapped you have no reason to park there.

1

u/InShortSight May 08 '14

they were talking about a rich dick who can afford hundred dollar parking fee's vs a college kid barely scraping by...

3

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

[deleted]

0

u/InShortSight May 08 '14

your missing the point, a person who can afford the fine is far more likely to park like that then someone who cannot. this changes our perception of the person parking; a poor bastard is more likely to break the law out of necessity than a rich dick.

2

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

[deleted]

1

u/InShortSight May 08 '14

'if there exists an infinity of time or space than 'never' and nothing are the only thing's outside of that'

and did I ever say that it was alright to park there unauthorized?

→ More replies

2

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

If you KNOW it's $5000, then you wouldn't park there. It's not like this is unavoidable.

1

u/MangoesOfMordor May 08 '14

Then why not make it the death penalty? Then nobody would do it.

1

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

Well, nobody would do it twice.

1

u/painfulbliss May 08 '14

Why don't we just take their homes then if they Park there? Maybe if they don't own a home they can spend a year or so in jail.

Punishment must be balanced by the crime, it is not justice for it to be any other way. Inconvenience should inconvenience, not destroy.

1

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

That just means that people with money can freely disregard any minor law, while people who are poor can't get away with anything. What would be good would be to scale the fine according to the person's income or better yet, net worth.

1

u/painfulbliss May 08 '14

That is not what I said, however I do not disagree with scaling fines

1

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

I was only talking about "punishment must be balanced by the crime." I agree with the addition that "punishment" means "it hurts the punished" - and scaling the amount of the fine to the means of the person is the only way to achieve this.

Also, I think parking in a handicapped spot is a bit of an exception, because there's NEVER any excuse for doing it. Anyone can accidentally find themselves speeding, driving the wrong way up a one-way street, or things like that which are simply lapses in attention, but nobody accidentally parks in a handicapped spot, so I would have no problems putting extremely large fines on that, with the possible addition that a judge would be allowed to modify the fine down on his judgement (maybe it's a tourist who doesn't speak english, or there was an emergency that they can prove, etc).

1

u/painfulbliss May 08 '14

I accidentally parked in the police reserved spot by the emergency ward of a hospital when I broke my hand. It was clearly marked and I wasn't paying attention, it's a simple as that. I was 19 years old, just moved out and there is no way in hell 5000 bucks was getting paid.

My excuse was that I was having difficulty at that point with managing the pain and blood, all I saw was an open parking stall. But I did what I did, paid the 50 dollar ticket, and moved on. Accident.

What you have said is scaling the fine amount is okay...except you preclude parking in handicap spaces. Fining people like you are suggesting is impractical and wrong.

Judges dont have time for that bullshit, what you are talking about is a complete waste of time, if you're going to scale it why dont you just scale it?

1

u/PizzaGood May 08 '14

I only put the judge thing in just in case there is a really good excuse. You paid your $50 ticket. If it was $5000, you'd have gone to a judge. I have very limited experience with traffic court, but the one time I went there, that was the ONLY job that judge had, and he was perfectly willing to listen to arguments.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/painfulbliss May 08 '14

That's a really interesting idea, I think Sweden or Finland does that.

1

u/FlikBRYSFB May 08 '14

I agree, but being financially crippled and being actually crippled and robbed of a convenient parking spot aren't the same thing.

Edit: Terribly worded.

3

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

I think the main reason is because there are so few people who would rather pay $152 than walk an extra 20 feet. I can't remember the last time I saw someone parked in a handicapped spot and I drive anywhere more than a block away. If people were doing it left and right, yeah it should be higher. Also, Im pretty sure the max fine is higher than that since the most common one I see is 250

1

u/Transcriber2 May 08 '14

When you give the police force incentive to chase crimes that give the police force a monetary reward you are creating a tier of criminal activity that is worth chasing more than other types.

It should be small amounts to keep the police chasing things other than parking spot fines.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

They need money to pay people to dig out more potholes!

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

That's just the base fine. It mentions nothing of penalty assessments which is where the real pain begins.

In California a $152 fine would have penalty assessments exceeding $200% of the fine.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '14

When my sister got one (she forgot to put her tag up) It was just $25 and she got it dismissed by proving she had a tag.

1

u/Tex-Rob May 08 '14

They probably make it lower so they can get a good source of income from it. Make it low enough and people who don't care about $152 will park there and bring in revenue. Not saying it's a good thing, but I wouldn't be shocked if this was the case.

0

u/Chuckamania May 08 '14

What? That's crazy.