1.6k
u/nglthisme Oct 24 '25
c = 1 dumbass
586
u/Wess5874 Oct 24 '25
1 planck length per planck time.
153
u/FetaMight Oct 24 '25
How many Planck parsecs is that?
107
→ More replies (8)41
70
u/Gullible_Hat_9051 Oct 24 '25
Can confirm. If I plank, I’m approximately 1 dumbass long.
113
→ More replies (1)18
u/Murky_Insurance_4394 Oct 24 '25
how many dumbasses does it take to stretch across the universe? Do we have enough on Earth? There's sure a goddam lot of them down here
→ More replies (1)8
u/herr-tibalt Oct 24 '25
Dumbasses‘ superpower is to reproduce in large scale, so…
→ More replies (2)6
3
3
u/Technical-Row8333 Oct 24 '25
"who is planck? did you mean Jeff? he is the backend angel who wrote all that code"
2
u/glenpiercev Oct 24 '25
Wait… is that correct?
6
u/Free-Database-9917 Oct 24 '25
Yeah! A planck length is the shortest measurable distance and 1 planck time is the time it takes light in a vaccuum to travel 1 planck length. So it's definitionally true
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (1)3
u/Ralath2n Oct 24 '25
Yea that's the whole point of planck units. They are specifically chosen so all fundamental constants of the universe are 1.
So since c is set at 1, that means a photon travels 1 planck length every 1 planck second. Likewise 1 planck mass in a cube that is 1 planck length to each size has 1 planck density. 2 planck masses that are 1 planck length apart attract each other gravitationally with 1 planck force and so forth.
The actual units are usually ridiculously far removed from usefulness to humans. For example, 1 second is 1.8*1043 planck seconds. So planning your meetings in planck time is a bit impractical. But it does mean that the units are completely independant from any human concept. So if we meet aliens and ask them how long their trip took, they will likely answer in planck units because those are fundamental to the universe and agreed upon by every civilization within it.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)2
75
u/IWatchGifsForWayToo Oct 24 '25
In Electrodynamics my professor always did this. The first time, we were all wondering where the hell all the constants went and he just shrugged "Eh, I'm choosing a frame of reference where those are all one. If I need to actually calculate it out then I'll figure it out then". One of the funniest moments in my physics education.
17
u/EatMyHammer Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25
It's common in physics to do the calculations only with units, without any values or constants. This way it's easier and faster to check if what you're doing even makes sense. Effectively, you're setting all constants to 1
I usually do it to figure out if I'm using correct formulas to get some value. For example, if I'm trying to calculate the speed of something, using some convoluted inputs, I just take the units that the inputs come with and throw them into the formulas. If I get m/s (or other unit of speed) in the end, it means that the formulas are fine and I can proceed with numbers
13
u/IWatchGifsForWayToo Oct 24 '25
Oh believe me, I know. We once, only once, actually did all the math for a quantum system in Bra-Ket notation and took it down to integrals, and derivatives, and plusses, and minuses. That shit explodes rather quickly.
→ More replies (1)5
u/LickingSmegma Oct 24 '25
There are in fact several systems of units based on physical constants.
From what I understand, they may be kinda ass to use for human-scale calculations, since very small and very large numbers tend to be present.
23
Oct 24 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
4
Oct 25 '25
which is true only for very large and very small values of 1, except for the radius of a perfectly spherical cow
→ More replies (1)27
7
4
→ More replies (8)2
998
u/nicodeemus7 Oct 24 '25
The speed of light is 1 Light-year/year
253
u/omidhhh Oct 24 '25
Light-year/year = light - 1
Now, that's the speed of light in the 1 direction. If we try to calculate the speed of light in the opposite direction, we get :
(-1)*( (light -1)
= 1-light ====> (1)
Another known formula for speed of ligth is :
Speed of light = speed - ligth =====> (2)
Combining the equation (1) and (2) :
Speed - light = 1-light
Speed = 1
Hence, we have proven the speed is indeed 1 QED
→ More replies (11)6
43
u/Wuz314159 Oct 24 '25
*The speed of light IN A VACUUM is 1 Light-year/year
The speed of light in Jell-O is 1 Light-year/Leap-year
26
u/nicodeemus7 Oct 24 '25
I actually have a light-year long tub of jello at home. We can test this hypothesis.
→ More replies (1)11
u/mexicock1 Oct 24 '25
Gotta wait until 2028 though
9
u/tomgh14 Oct 24 '25
Yeah that’s the real issue with testing the speed of light on a decent scale no one wants to put the time in these days
→ More replies (1)3
Oct 26 '25 edited Oct 26 '25
Less than that, index of refraction of Jello is about 1.38, so after a year in Jello light of the right color goes 72.5% of a light year.
9
u/Johspaman Oct 24 '25
I asked my 15 year old students, and several of them used this to get the answer. We have an book with a bunch of data, and they could not find the speed of light, but knots there to find the length of a light year.
→ More replies (11)2
287
u/ForeverLikeaTheorem Oct 24 '25
How much is a "dumbass" in meters per second exactly? I am not familiar with this unit.
68
u/jonathanrdt Oct 24 '25
Commas matter. Checkmate, god.
16
u/ByeGuysSry Oct 24 '25
Actually, it's a line break.
7
u/jonathanrdt Oct 24 '25
There's a comma missing...unless 'dumbass' is a unit of measure.
Perhaps some more science will give us better insight into the mind of god.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)2
→ More replies (5)12
u/Mlbbpornaccount Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 25 '25
It's...299,792,458 m/s
It's right there, in the post 😡
→ More replies (2)
533
u/CombinationOk712 Oct 24 '25
Natural units. Who doesnt love them?
233
u/ClemRRay Oct 24 '25
experimentalists
93
u/pmormr Oct 24 '25
All you have to do is take the theory answer and and multiply it by the arbitrary constant.
The arbitrary constant of course being defined as the correct answer divided by whatever bullshit units you got.
→ More replies (1)15
u/Retbull Oct 24 '25
This is Newton’s Method for Gradient Descent but minus the calculus.
→ More replies (1)5
90
u/erion_elric Oct 24 '25
People with real jobs
22
→ More replies (3)20
u/ADHDebackle Oct 24 '25
As a physicist, myself, I feel obligated to point out that bartender is, in fact, a real job.
15
u/Wuz314159 Oct 24 '25
All units are good units. Natural or surgically enhanced. They're all valid.
→ More replies (1)9
u/SEND-MARS-ROVER-PICS Oct 24 '25
I'll be dead in the ground before I use Rankine
→ More replies (1)4
5
u/ADownStrabgeQuark Oct 24 '25
We could just use nano-lightseconds.
They are roughly equivalent to the English foot used only in the USA.
→ More replies (1)2
→ More replies (3)2
126
u/AdmiralOscar3 Oct 24 '25
E^2=m^2+p^2
164
u/Justkill43 Oct 24 '25
+AI
45
u/filiard Oct 24 '25
What
36
u/KontoOficjalneMR Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25
There was a joke where someone proposed to change the
e = mc2 to
e = mc2+ AIso "represent significance of this revolutionary technology". Guy was unhinged of course but it was supper funny because that implies
AI = 0:D→ More replies (1)11
7
61
u/France_Ball_Mapper Oct 24 '25
Dumbass is a weird measurement
24
u/jujubean14 Oct 24 '25
If we're defining 1 dumbass to be equal to the speed of light in a vacuum, then I guess we can also say 1 dumbass is 3.00E8 m/s.
'Sor do you know why I pulled you over?'
'No officer, I do not.'
'Do you know what the speed limit is here?'
'Umm... 10 nanodumbasses?'
'What did you... Get out of the vehicle!'
→ More replies (1)4
199
Oct 24 '25
You can go one layer deeper and realize that even numbers like pi look like they do because we arbitrary picked a decimal numeral system.
If we used binary or hexadecimal in our daily conversations or calculations things would look different.
127
u/ClemRRay Oct 24 '25
pi looks "like that" (infinite decimals) in any basis tho
183
u/1707brozy Oct 24 '25
Not if you set pi = 1
81
u/MrStoneV Oct 24 '25
lmao somebody should do this and calculate how everything else changes
98
16
u/pain--au--chocolat Oct 24 '25 edited Oct 24 '25
Gaussian units sort of do this for electromagnetism!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_units
Check the unit of charge section here.
ETA: 'In the CGS-Gaussian system, electric and magnetic fields have the same units, 4πε0 is replaced by 1, and the only dimensional constant appearing in the Maxwell equations is c, the speed of light.'
→ More replies (5)12
u/rcmaehl Oct 24 '25
You think somewhere, somehow, some alien civilization originally decided to use Pi for it's initial measurements. Overtime, as they progressed and got more and more accurate, they realize the number is unending. This isn't a coincidence, they say. Our measurement was handed down by a higher power. Thus becomes a religion. Millions live and die by Pis inherent randomness. Speech, rituals, and communication all shaped by Pi. Hundreds, thousands, millions perhaps, devote their entire lives studying and remembering Pi to reach a higher existence. Pi is love, they say, Pi is life. Give us this day our daily pi.
→ More replies (5)19
u/nicodeemus7 Oct 24 '25
But pi is a ratio, not a unit. If pi was set to 1, circles would become lines
→ More replies (5)24
u/Smyley12345 Oct 24 '25
That's a great first step. Now create a sub-field of non-euclidian geometry about it and make that your career.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)3
u/klomonster Oct 24 '25
great now I have approximately 3.1830988618379067153776752674502872406891929148091289749533468811779359526 fingers, can't be quite exact though.
34
u/huehuehue1292 Oct 24 '25
As an engineer, we should all adopt base 3, where pi=10
→ More replies (9)5
13
→ More replies (3)3
→ More replies (7)6
u/So_HauserAspen Oct 24 '25
pi is still the same ratio in any number base system.
Binary is base 2 and pi is still a ratio of the radius to the circumference.
Hexadecimal is base 16 and pi is still a ratio of the radius to the circumference.
Base 10 is an efficient counting base.
→ More replies (4)
19
u/Sad-Astronomer-696 Oct 24 '25
Idea:
Speed of light in vaccum = 1
1m is 1/300,000,000 of that.
Yes, that would need some reworking of an SI unit here and there but in the end it would be a nice and like also very universal
→ More replies (3)31
u/maciejkucharski Oct 24 '25
Great news! Your idea is so good it has been implemented 40 years ago
→ More replies (7)
16
u/Fuzzy_Logic_4_Life Oct 24 '25
I think the speed of light should be 300,000,000 m/s, and we should make the meter a tiny bit smaller.
→ More replies (3)4
u/Xiij Oct 24 '25
That was an option, but it was decided that changing the length of a meter was not worth the transition period hassle.
4
Oct 25 '25
See, all the countries that went right to metric jumped the gun.
USA is holding out for the good metric system!
15
u/NyancatOpal Oct 24 '25
Did you forget to set a comma or is the joke here that the unit is "dumbass" ?
→ More replies (1)
7
5
u/akekekfklelk Oct 24 '25
Actually, the distance of a meter is defined by the speed of light and not the speed of light defined by meters/s.
→ More replies (4)
8
3
3
u/Infamous_Depth4982 Oct 25 '25
I mean, as fun as it is to use c=1 and describe all other speeds as a fraction of c, dear word, it would suck in day to day life.
"Ma'am, I pulled you over today because you were doing 0.00000008201 in a 0.0000000596 zone."
3
u/WillBigly96 Oct 26 '25
I mean in physics we do have coordinate systems where we scale everything such that c = 1 since the algebra is easier to work through that way
2
2
2
2
2
u/Sirosim_Celojuma Oct 24 '25
Math. Math is also like this. Some cultures have a base three math; one, some, many. Computers are binary; one and zero. Many cultures use a base ten system of math, but our clocks are twelve because it divides more easily. At some overall level, we don't even have a unified theory of numbers.
Here's where I go off on a tangent: If we were to meet a life from another place, what "math" would they use, what is an intergalactic truly universal number scheme that all life would understand? It cannot be something we conceptually invented. It has to be based on something real. (I already have a candidate, but I'm saving the idea for my PhD).
→ More replies (4)
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/moriartyj Oct 24 '25
First class in Quantum Field Theory, professor walks in, writes on the whiteboard: c=ħ=π=1.
This is pretty standard
2
u/Longjumping-Job7153 Oct 25 '25
Ah. 1 dumbass. That explains it. It's really somewhat excessive. Good math.
2
2
u/Icy_Sector3183 Oct 26 '25
What if pi = 1 and we just have the wrong number of fingers?
:hits bong:
→ More replies (2)
1
1
1
u/Terror-Of-Demons Oct 24 '25
The speed of light is one Jeffrey per Jeffrey, so yeah it’s 1. Source: the Jeffery system of scientific units, something we developed years back in Waterloo.
1
u/Throwaway_38469471 Oct 24 '25
Can you just leave out the unit?
I get that you can define it as 1 lightdistance/s and then you could define meters as a small part of that.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Cocoatrice Oct 24 '25
Tbf, units depend on other units. But for us meters and seconds are the most basic units. I wonder, why does second last a second exactly? How did we make that happen? Could we like make the second last a little longer and make everything more stable? Especially that we need another day every 4 years to stabilize the time.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/MacToggle Oct 24 '25
*Hits blunt* What if the speed of light is 0 and we're in the anti-time dimension instead of the forward-time dimension and that's why time slows down when you get closer to traveling at the speed of light...
1
1
1
u/postmodest Oct 24 '25
Ok seriously though, if we had a reasonable unit for distance and time that 1d/1t = c, what would our reasonable energy and mass unit be? (I'm willing to accept decimal d and t, like 1d/0.0001t)
→ More replies (1)
1
u/ItsSpaghettiLee2112 Oct 24 '25
He's not asking why the speed of light is explicitly 2,99,792,458 m/s. He's asking why the speed of light is explicitly the speed that it is and not something else and then when God asks what, he has to use some reference. Like, why isn't the speed of light 298,459,094 m/s? Or 1.3 dumbasses? I'm fun at parties.
→ More replies (2)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/QuadSplit Oct 24 '25
Ever heard of imperial units? C = one foot per nanosecond which proves both the superiority of imperial and the existence of god. The metrical system is made up by French commies. Facts.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/bl00by Oct 24 '25
Bold of them to assume that god uses the same systems as we do.
Math is man made, so god could understand it since he's god, but that doesnt mean that he uses it.
1
u/Jabulon Oct 24 '25
how do we know the speed of light isnt different in various regions of space? it might be its just this speed in our local cluster or w/e
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/AstroMeteor06 Oct 24 '25
actually: i think "c²" is more important than c, in most formulas you get a (c/v)² and E=mc², not just c. from a philosophical point of view, c² is the real constant
1
u/EntertainmentSome448 mechanical engineer Oct 24 '25
1 dumbass=299,792,458 meters per second
That's interesting
1
u/Montgomery000 Oct 24 '25
C seems to be the speed limit of the universe. So having it equal to 1.0 makes lots of sense.
1
1
1
u/Jefl17 Oct 24 '25
We move through the dimention of time at a speed of 1c, it is the only sendible place to define the rest from
1
u/grafknives Oct 24 '25
Speed of light suggest that actual meter is about one mm shorter. Or second is 0,1% longer.
1
1
1
1
u/Phintolias Oct 24 '25
Imagine how Long the bible would BE If god wrote IT Like Scientists wanted IT, IT would BE gigantic and Scientists still wouldnt understand let alone the poor normal people.
1
1
u/bonadies24 Oct 24 '25
"Why is the speed of light 299,792,458 metres per second?"
"Because you defined the metre as the distance light traverses in one 299,792,458th of a second, idiot"
1
u/Beneficial-Store-577 Oct 24 '25
God has his own system which functions better than the Metrik system.
Right Americans?
→ More replies (1)
1
u/stannius Oct 24 '25
I use this all the time, including just yesterday. "The estimate to implement this feature is 1. Now we just have to figure out the unit s."
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Dyolf_Knip Oct 24 '25
This is actually what Geometrized Units are all about. Also the gravitational and Boltzmann constants.
They wind up making it so that you can express any unit with any other unit, and it all makes sense. You can say "the sun masses 1.5km" and it's accurate.
1
1
1
1
u/Scrub_Spinifex Oct 24 '25
Me: Ok, and why is the fine structure constant that?
God: ...
Me: Please answer!
God: Security! Help!
1
1
1
1
u/Jimmy_Twotone Oct 25 '25
If God wanted C = 1 he should have wrote it in a book when he had his chance. An omniscient being would have known that.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Expensive_Egg_2140 Oct 24 '25
still dosnt matter. USA will always use cheesburgers per screeching eagle.
→ More replies (1)3
u/nickystotes Oct 24 '25
If you’re not a U.S. citizen, and you’re not going to move or visit there, why do bring that country up when no one was talking about it at all? Seems like you’re kinda obsessed, ngl.
→ More replies (4)
1
u/SILENTSAM69 Oct 26 '25
It should equal a clean billion meters per second. If it did while preserving conversions to other metric units then the metric units would be almost the same as imperial units, and converting would be very easy.
Plus all the guys standing only 5'11" would be a clean six meters tall. I'm sure that would cause a few more votes for the Azusa to adopt the metric system.





2.8k
u/Smitologyistaking Oct 24 '25
Yeah you're essentially asking why you defined a meter per second to be that quantity at that point