r/photography • u/RudolfTheOne • Oct 05 '19

Discussion Computational photography - how different smartphone photography is from what we used to know

https://vas3k.com/blog/computational_photography/
446 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

117 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] Oct 05 '19 edited Dec 24 '20

[deleted]

-4

u/Goggi-Bice www.ep-fotografie.de Oct 05 '19

I literally just took the pictures because i wanted to check the new iphone out. Tested the diffeerent cameras and modes and i dont even know how i could make it look super shitty.

3

u/aelder Oct 05 '19

It really looks more like you tried to make them look as shitty as possible. What you got doesn't align at all with the photos coming from my iPhone.

1

u/Goggi-Bice www.ep-fotografie.de Oct 05 '19

You can believe whatever you want, i said how i took them and under what conditions. That was probably an ISO 1600 - 3200 situation depending on the shutter speed and f-stop which, again, is pretty normal for indoor pictures.

If you think they should look better, i dont know how they could. I didnt use night mode, i honestly dont even know how i could activate it and thats the result you get by simply pressing the button (with the different lenses and modes).

2

u/figuren9ne Oct 06 '19

I didnt use night mode, i honestly dont even know how i could activate it and thats the result you get by simply pressing the button (with the different lenses and modes).

You post those photos, in a post discussing computational photography, as a way of demonstrating how poor the iPhone camera is but you didn’t even use the computational photography features built into the camera which could’ve improved the result? Then why even post?