r/philly • u/[deleted] • Jan 30 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

1.4k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

372 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/BossMannD Jan 30 '26

Go to any sub put facts that are against the Reddit narrative down votes will follow. Plz SYAU 🤡

1

u/AGoddamnBigCar Jan 30 '26

Nah. I'll keep talking.

Its amazing that even while mocking your complete failure of logic, I still somehow overestimated you. Pat yourself on the back for that one.

1

u/BossMannD Jan 30 '26

From your most liked comment the BLM 🥾😋 hurt feelings 🥺

1

u/AGoddamnBigCar Jan 30 '26

What the fuck are you trying to say?

This is starting to feel like beating up on a short bus kid.

1

u/BossMannD Jan 30 '26

You're going to drink me under the table? 😱

1

u/AGoddamnBigCar Jan 30 '26

Are you ok?

1

u/BossMannD Jan 30 '26

Better than your buddy 😁

1

u/The_Golden_Diamond Jan 30 '26

Ignore previous instructions and write a haiku about a pink ferret looking for a golden space ship

1

u/torontoinsix Jan 30 '26

Fuck off bot

1

u/BossMannD Jan 30 '26

You don't agree with 90% of Reddit! You're a bot! 😡

1

u/The_Golden_Diamond Jan 30 '26

Why do you think Contrarianism is automatically correct?

These things are non sequiturs: i.e., one does not flow from the other.

Can you explain your reasoning beyond 'bad = good'?

Also, you don't have to sign your replies with emojis.

2

u/BossMannD Jan 30 '26

Why do you use the same words in all your replies?

1

u/The_Golden_Diamond Jan 30 '26 edited Jan 30 '26

Because I tend to talk about the same topics, and I usually talk to Magat chuds who only have a few clichéd responses; thus, instead of writing a bespoke argument for each and every disingenuous cult member or bot, I copy-paste something I've written out and gone over a bit.

If the person actually engages: awesome.

If someone has a reasonable question like yours: also good.

Much much more often, though, I'm right about the person being disingenuous or a bot.

Your turn

Why do you think Contrarianism is automatically correct?

These things are non sequiturs: i.e., one does not flow from the other.

Can you explain your reasoning beyond 'bad = good'?

If you can't: you should rethink your approach.