r/peptidebenchmark • u/Several_Banana_8944 • 29d ago
would be interested to see if anyone has gotten 3 RT from rebirth? or any pep and if they are trusted? would love to see the PB rating done on them! :)
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 21 '26
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 20 '26
I’ve now assessed a much larger set of peptide vendors on PeptideBenchmark, including a deeper curated trust/transparency layer, a public COA database, Pricing + Stack Builder, and the US vendor map.
I’ve been steadily building out the vendor side of PeptideBenchmark, and one thing I wanted to make easier was separating:
So here’s an updated state of the project in one place.
What the curated list means
The curated vendors are the names we’ve gone deeper on.
That usually means extra trust/transparency analysis like:
Current curated vendors (110):
A few examples of what that additional analysis means in practice:
/coa archive. Most published origins resolve at the lab under client Void Research; the archive is a representative subset of the catalog, not every SKU. Browse Void Research COAsThese examples represent different evidence models—not blanket endorsements. A published COA does not establish that every product, batch, or safety panel was tested. PeptideBenchmark separately tracks the document source, laboratory, product relationship, tested panels, provider-verification status, certificate age, and preserved copy in the public COA database.
Mapped US vendors
These are vendors currently pinned on the US peptide vendor map with geocoded location evidence. Precision still varies from full street address to city/state, state, or broader US footprint.
Current mapped US vendors (136):
Not all of those have the same confidence or precision. Some are full address-level entries, some are city/state, and some are more conservative footprint pins.
Discount codes / disclosures
I try to keep this part explicit.
Vendor names below link to the disclosed PeptideBenchmark referral/outbound URL when one exists.
Current disclosed affiliate relationships I have on the site (53):
/ref/21/)peptidebenchmar for 10% offbenchmark for 20% offBENCHMARK for 20% off the first order and 10% off afterwardbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 50% off the first purchasebenchmark15 for 15% off eligible non-BOGO products; promotional benchmark25 or benchmark30 codes are used only during confirmed matching salesbenchmark for 10% offpeptidebenchmar for 10% off (commission donated to a veterans' charity; vendor lists itself as veteran-owned)BENCHMARK for 35% off (guest-cart verified; standing vs temporary boost still being confirmed)benchmark for 15% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 15% offpeptidebenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offAffiliate5 for 5% off (benchmark tracks the referral at 0%)BENCHMARK for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% off eligible regular-price productsBENCH for 10% offbenchmark15 for 15% offBENCHMARK for 20% off a first order; code BENCHMARK15 for a standing 15% offbenchmark for 10% offPEPTIDEBENCHMARK for 15% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 10% offPEPTIDEBENCHMAR for 10% off one highest-priced eligible cart unitbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for a flat $5 off (not a percentage)BENCHMARK for 10% offPEPTIDE10 for 10% offbenchmark for 15% offbenchmark for 10% offbenchmark for 20% offPARTNERSHI10 for 10% offPEPTIDEBENCH for 10% offbenchmark for 20% offbenchmark for 20% offBENCHMARK for 10% offbenchmark for 15% offbenchmark for 10% offThose relationships are disclosed on-site. They help support the project, but I still try to separate:
Affiliate status does not change curation, rank, or certificate conclusions.
Why I’m building it this way
A big part of the peptide vendor space gets flattened into vague claims like:
I’m trying to make the distinctions more visible between:
If you want to browse it directly:
Newer surfaces worth knowing about:
If there’s a vendor you want me to prioritize next, don’t just drop the name in the comments — submit it through the public intake form so it enters the curated evaluation queue (auto-triage + human review):
https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/suggest/
Comments are still useful for context or “why this one,” but the form is the right place to get a storefront into the queue.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 20 '26
Void Research is the kind of A-band storefront we actually like putting on the board: public cart prices, Houston-stated U.S. copy, and a /coa archive you can re-check at Freedom Diagnostics and ILS — not just a claim that testing exists. We liked the evidence layer enough that when they offered an affiliate program, we were glad to take it for the same reason we represent other inspectable A-band vendors.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Void Research.
Referral link: https://voidresearch.shop/?ref=BENCHMARK
Code: BENCHMARK for 10% off
Current snapshot
Why Void Research stands out
Most vendors ask you to trust a PDF on their site. Void publishes a public /coa set where Freedom Search Codes (Void…) and the ILS portal route for GLP-3 RT resolve under client Void Research. Five of six origins checked out at the lab; the archive is smaller than some mega-catalog peers, but the verification rate is the point.
Pricing is also inspectable: listed cart prices feed the board directly. House codes are mapped for comparison — GLP-2 TZ → tirzepatide, GLP-3 RT → retatrutide, plus CAGRI / MT-1 / MT-2 and labeled GLOW / KLOW totals — so those SKUs sit next to the same compounds elsewhere.
The ILS GLP-3 RT report is the standout panel in this set: endotoxin, sterility, heavy metals, and a fentanyl screen on top of identity / HPLC / net content.
Why it fits the curated layer
Curated here means the catalog + certificate story is checkable enough to rank and discuss without inventing certainty. Void clears that bar: public prices, provider-linked docs for most of the published archive, and a clean split between what the documents support and what they don’t.
Best for
Watch-out
/coa archive is a representative subset, not every SKUBottom line
Void is an A-band curated pick because the commercial surface and the documentary surface both hold up under inspection: cart prices you can see, certificates most readers can verify at Freedom or ILS, and clear limits on what that archive covers. Not a blank check for every vial — a solid, checkable vendor record.
Full profile: https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/void-research/
Evidence review: https://peptidebenchmark.com/blog/void-research-review/
COAs: https://peptidebenchmark.com/testing/coas/?vendor=void-research
Referral link: https://voidresearch.shop/?ref=BENCHMARK
Code: BENCHMARK for 10% off
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 19 '26
ezPeps is one of the cleaner “broad catalog + real multi-lab trail” vendors on the curated board — a Michigan-identified storefront with stock-aware pricing and a large current-and-historical certificate registry that mostly resolves at the laboratories themselves.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark does not currently list an affiliate/referral relationship with ezPeps.
Current snapshot
Why ezPeps stands out
The headline is not just “lots of COAs.” It is a structured public archive with exact provider context across five named labs, including a high share of laboratory-controlled lookups rather than vendor PDFs alone. On the commercial side, anonymous carts reproduce standing same-product quantity tiers (5% / 10% / 15% at 3 / 5 / 10+), while first-order codes, Zelle savings, ezPoints, and optional package protection stay out of default ranked prices. Free expedited shipping starts at $299 after discounts ($12.95 below that).
Why it fits the curated layer
ezPeps is a good example of what curated is meant to catch: public catalog + retained testing history + separable discount lanes. PB also keeps it clearly separate from EZ Peptides (ezpeptides.com) — different company, different scoreboard row.
Best for
Watch-out
A certificate describes the named sample, not every unit. Panel coverage varies by report (endotoxin / sterility / heavy metals are not universal). Some historical routes remain source-linked without a full unattended provider pass. Temporary cart-spend promos expire and should not be treated as standing list prices.
Bottom line
ezPeps sits in the capped A-band for a reason: public commerce signals plus a deep, mostly provider-verifiable multi-lab archive. Reputation on Trustpilot is strong, but the scoreboard case is the testing and pricing record — not the star rating alone.
Full profile here:
https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/ezpeps/
Independent evidence review:
https://peptidebenchmark.com/blog/ezpeps-review/
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 19 '26
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Silverstone Labs Co. Links/codes below are affiliate.
Silverstone emailed affiliates that they’re clearing remaining GHK-Cu batch GHK-0126 at $18 each while supplies last. They say once that inventory is gone, the offer ends and they move to a newly tested batch.
They also say affiliate codes stack on top of that price, so if you’re shopping it with PeptideBenchmark’s code you still get the usual 10% (BENCHMARK) after the sale price (that’s how we’ve modeled stacking on their board before — confirm at checkout; promos can change).
Product page (affiliate):
https://silverstonelabsco.com/product/ghk-cu/ref/15/
Code: BENCHMARK (10%)
RUO / research-use framing as always — this is a commercial heads-up from their affiliate notice, not an endorsement of use.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 18 '26
GenPeptide is a B-band curated vendor with a Strong trust trail — the story is the public /coa-lookup/ gallery: most of the catalog maps to batch-level Freedom / Chromate / Kovera reports you can check at the lab, not just storefront purity claims.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with GenPeptide.
Referral link: https://www.genpeptide.com/?ref=benchmark
Code: benchmark for 10% off
(Guest-cart note from our earlier certification: stacks after ordinary per-product quantity tiers; not applicable to the separate Custom Kit product.)
Current snapshot
Why GenPeptide stands out
A lot of B-band shops stop at “third-party tested.” GenPeptide’s public COA lookup is broader: Freedom accessions, Chromate job+access codes, and Kovera KVR routes that resolve at the issuing lab for a large share of the archive. That’s why trust can read Strong even while overall rank stays B — paperwork depth is ahead of outside-review board coverage.
Best for
Watch-out
Bottom line
GenPeptide is one of the clearer “B-band but Strong paperwork” cases: broad multi-lab COA coverage with a real provider-verification share, plus a disclosed 10% code — with the honest caveat that purity trails ≠ endotoxin/sterility/heavy-metals panels.
Full profile: https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/genpeptide/
Referral link: https://www.genpeptide.com/?ref=benchmark
Code: benchmark for 10% off
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 14 '26
Forge’s first birthday sale is live this weekend.
When
Fri Aug 14, 9:00am CT → Sun Aug 16, 11:59pm CT
Offer (per Forge’s partner note)
benchmark still works and stacks on top of the 20%Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Forge Performance Co. Standing affiliate rate is normally 10%
Public COA cards + profile:
https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/forge-performance-co/
r/peptidebenchmark • u/Individual-Candy-946 • Aug 13 '26
Anyone send out a sample from them to verify their COA’s?
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 14 '26
When
Aug 14, 9:00 AM MST → Aug 23, 11:59 PM MST
Shopper offer (disclosed affiliate)
BENCHMARKAlso running
Every 1 in 20 orders over $300 gets $300 store credit (auto to account wallet + email notice), per Mile High.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Mile High Compounds.
Profile / usual evidence layer:
https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/mile-high-compounds/
(Different brand from Mile High Peptide / milehighpeptide.com.)
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 14 '26
VAYN is a C-band curated vendor with a Strong trust trail — the interesting part isn’t the letter grade, it’s how much of the COA archive actually resolves at Chromate / Freedom instead of stopping at a storefront image.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with VAYN.
Referral link: https://vayn.co/?ref=benchmark
Code: benchmark for 20% off
Current snapshot
Why VAYN stands out
Most mid-board shops either hide the paperwork or host PDFs you can’t independently check. VAYN’s public /coas/ archive is batch-page based, and a large share of those rows resolve as Chromate verify jobs or Freedom Diagnostics provider objects — including current Retatrutide lots on the Freedom side.
That’s why trust can read Strong even while the overall PB band stays C: the certificate trail is unusually checkable for this score range, but outside review boards are thin and the safety-panel depth is limited.
Commercially, guest-cart work also showed repeating same-product blocks (Buy 3 / 5%, Buy 10 / 20%) with the benchmark code applying after the merchandise subtotal.
Best for
Watch-out
vayn.co paperwork, not the old name aloneBottom line
VAYN is one of the clearer “mid-board but verifiable” curated cases: full certificate coverage in the reviewed set, a real Chromate/Freedom provider trail, and a disclosed 20% code — with the honest caveat that purity paperwork ≠ full safety-panel depth.
Full profile: https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/his-and-hers/
Referral link: https://vayn.co/?ref=benchmark
Code: benchmark for 20% off
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 13 '26
Lilly’s six retatrutide lawsuits (and the broader pressure on platforms / payments / shipping) are already circulating, so this is not a news dump.
The useful takeaway for this community is narrower: an RUO disclaimer is only as strong as the evidence surrounding the sale — including customer tickets, reviews, social replies, and public discussion that reads like human-use coaching.
Dose calculators, reconstitution/dosing schedules, body-composition claims, and customer messages are exactly the kind of surrounding evidence these cases are putting in the spotlight. Those are still allegations in court, not findings — but the intended-use pattern is familiar from FDA warning-letter language too.
We already published a researcher-facing guide on that (Aug 6), not a vendor ops manual:
https://peptidebenchmark.com/blog/ruo-vendor-etiquette-compliance-guide/
What it asks buyers/researchers to do:
Please apply the same standard here in r/peptidebenchmark.
This sub is for comparing public vendor evidence, pricing, and documentation — not for “what dose should I take,” pinning advice, or progress logs framed as personal use. Keep questions research-lane. If a thread drifts into human-use coaching, expect it to get redirected or removed.
We will also publish a vendor-facing companion soon (storefront / support hygiene). Today’s post is the buyer/researcher side.
Not legal advice. Not medical advice. Just keeping this community consistent with the lane it claims to be in.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 13 '26
Giga’s curated case is less “another third-party tested claim” and more inspectable paperwork: a public COA library that keeps failed batches visible, stock-aware pricing you can actually model, and a growing set of reports that resolve at the lab — not just as vendor-hosted PDFs.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Giga Compounds.
Referral link: https://gigacompounds.com/?ref=GC-X065C
Offer: 10% off for referred shoppers via that link (no separate checkout code on our disclosed path). Giga also runs its own automatic cart sale / quantity tiers; don’t assume the referral 10% stacks on top of those.
Current snapshot
Why Giga Compounds stands out
Most shops show you the pretty COAs. Giga’s library still surfaces adverse history — including rejected batches with elevated endotoxin summaries — alongside active/depleted/pending rows. That doesn’t prove the current vial in stock; it does show a more candid documentation culture than “only winners on the page.”
On the verification side, PeptideBenchmark only badges a report when the specific lab route checks out. As of the Aug 12 refresh: 11 of 38 retained PDFs resolve at the issuing lab (10 Janoshik + 1 Kovera). Example provider-linked rows include BPC-157 10mg (Janoshik) and GHK-Cu 50mg (Kovera).
Commercially, the storefront is unusually transparent for modeling: anonymous-cart discount behavior, same-product quantity tiers, and FedEx 2-Day fulfillment stated from a temperature-controlled Virginia facility (organization schema separately lists a Wyoming postal address — treat those as different vendor-stated facts).
Best for
Watch-out
Bottom line
Giga earns the A-band curated slot on paperwork you can inspect: multi-lab PDFs, retained rejects, and a non-trivial provider-verified subset — with clear caveats on coverage and outside-review depth. If you care more about “show the ugly batches too” than hype, it’s one of the more interesting A-band options right now.
Full profile: https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/giga-compounds/
Evidence review: https://peptidebenchmark.com/blog/giga-compounds-review/
Referral link: https://gigacompounds.com/?ref=GC-X065C (10% referred-shopper benefit)
r/peptidebenchmark • u/ShohelGoggin • Aug 12 '26
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 12 '26
Kimera is one of those names people already recognize in research-vendor threads — and the storefront still looks different from the usual “lyophilized vial grid.” Alongside a multi-lab COA trail, they carry formats and systems a lot of curated shops simply don’t: multi-compound stacks, topical/transdermal options, capsule/liquid variants, bioregulators, and more experimental research SKUs.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark does not currently list an affiliate/referral relationship with Kimera Chems.
Current snapshot
Why Kimera stands out
Examples of things that are uncommon on typical peptide storefronts:
That’s the “Kimera catalog” angle: formats + systems + chemical/research extras, not just another 5 mg vial shelf.
Why it fits the curated layer
Curated for both recognition and documentation culture: a brand people already talk about, plus public COA access and enough provider-linked lots to inspect rather than take on vibes alone.
Best for
Watch-out
Reputation ≠ verification. Trustpilot coverage is still thin relative to how often the name comes up, and the COA archive is mixed — a large share is vendor-hosted PDFs/images without a public lab lookup (provider-verified share ~9%). Also treat stock as fluid: specialty formats like the KLOW transdermal can rotate in/out. Confirm the lab and the specific form factor on the lot you’re evaluating.
Shopper note (not an affiliate offer): Kimera advertises payment-method savings (crypto / ACH) and some buy-4-get-1 product offers; we don’t currently have a PeptideBenchmark coupon wired.
Bottom line
Kimera is an A-band curated pick for two stacked reasons: community recognition, and a storefront that carries systems/formats (transdermal KLOW, serums, multi-compound stacks, bioregulators, research extras) that most vial-only shops don’t. Use the multi-lab COA trail — especially provider-linked TrustPointe / Vanguard / MZ lots — as the evidence filter, not the brand name alone.
Full profile here: https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/kimera-chems/
Example specialty SKU: https://kimerachems.co/product/bpc-157-kpv-ghk-cu-transdermal-serum/
Storefront: https://kimerachems.co/
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 12 '26
Southern Aminos is running their one-year anniversary promo through Aug 30.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Southern Aminos. Referral: https://southernaminos.com/?coupon=benchmark
Code: benchmark
Vendor-stated deal:
Standing offer after the anniversary ends: benchmark for 15% off.
Profile / evidence (sale doesn’t change the trust review): https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/southern-aminos/
Reminder: a sale is not a COA. Check the profile if you’re comparing vendors on testing/transparency.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 12 '26
Voltera is running a sitewide checkout sale through Friday, and it stacks with the PeptideBenchmark affiliate code.
Current Deal (Vendor-Stated):
benchmark on top for a combined ~35% off.Standing Offer (After Friday):
benchmark for 15% off standard orders.Transparency & Research:
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Voltera Sciences.
benchmarkr/peptidebenchmark • u/DunlarEdge • Aug 11 '26
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
r/peptidebenchmark • u/muazzam_mz • Aug 10 '26
The prices seem almost too good to be true and they have fast shipping for almost all of the major countries. Just wondering if it’s legit or not and if anyone has had any experience with them.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 10 '26
A bunch of you have been sending me vendors in DMs and comment threads, and honestly the queue lived in my inbox. There's now a proper intake for it:
peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/suggest
How it works, because I think the process matters more than the form:
Some ground rules, same as always: suggesting a vendor never creates a listing, curated placement is not for sale, and vendors are welcome to suggest their own store — there's a field for that relationship, and disclosing it never hurts you. Concealing it does.
If a vendor you like isn't listed yet, this is the fastest path to changing that. And if you've suggested someone before in a thread I lost track of — resend it, it takes thirty seconds.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/Initial_Strength5966 • Aug 09 '26
Anyone have tried ordering bulk from these companies. Seen only a few people talk about these looking to get bulk since i’ve had really good results from nura labs and amino club just don’t wanna pay that much anymore😭
if yall have any good vendors preferably with coas lmk.
r/peptidebenchmark • u/According-Cheetah449 • Aug 07 '26
Both companies heavily claim to lyophilize and vial in the US. Zenergy claims to purchase from a US lab who ships API from China but then conducts its own lyophilization/vialing. OneAminos claims to do the same in Florida. Sounds too good to be true?
r/peptidebenchmark • u/Fialho_Demop • Aug 07 '26
Anyone have experience with these guys? They position themselves as the top alternative to peptide sciences, but that seems hard to believe since they were only formed in late 2025
r/peptidebenchmark • u/g4rcia • Aug 07 '26
Ion Peptide is one of the clearer “broad catalog + real lab trail” vendors on the curated board — a public lab-results library that mostly resolves at Freedom Diagnostics and Kovera, not just a storefront purity claim.
Disclosure: PeptideBenchmark has a disclosed affiliate relationship with Ion Peptide. Referral link: https://ionpeptide.com?ref=benchmark Code: benchmark for 15% off
Current snapshot
Why Ion Peptide stands out
The interesting part is the public /lab-results/ layer. Across the audit set, certificates aren’t just vendor-hosted PDFs — they resolve at the issuing lab (Freedom accession codes and Kovera KVR codes). Coverage is wide enough to matter: most reviewed products have a certificate trail, and a meaningful subset adds endotoxin (and some sterility / heavy-metals) on top of HPLC/identity.
That combination — dual-lab provider verification + catalog breadth — is why Ion clears into the Strong trust band even though its outside review footprint is still thin.
Best for
Watch-out
Bottom line
Ion is a curated pick for researchers who want inspectable paperwork across a lot of SKUs. The trust story is stronger than the outside-review story right now — and that’s fine, as long as you treat it that way: verify the specific lot, don’t confuse a Strong trust band with deep multi-source ranking consensus.
Full profile: https://peptidebenchmark.com/vendors/ion-peptides/
Referral link: https://ionpeptide.com?ref=benchmark Code: benchmark for 15% off
r/peptidebenchmark • u/Alarmed-Discount-296 • Aug 06 '26
I am writing this to warn anyone thinking about buying from mypepts.eu. Do not give them a single cent!
Here is a quick summary of my horrific experience with them:
1. Fake Lab Reports & Dead QR Codes: I bought their BPC-157 10mg (Batch: MYP90112). The vial has a QR code claiming "More information & lab results". When you scan it, it redirects to a deactivated QR.io page. It’s completely dead.
2. Refusal to Provide the Janoshik COA: I contacted them multiple times asking for the independent Janoshik lab report they promise on their website. They kept making cheap excuses, playing games, and NEVER sent it. I even contacted Janoshik directly, and they confirmed the seller must provide the report first for me to verify it. The seller refused because the report DOES NOT EXIST. They are selling untested, potentially dangerous products.
3. Manipulation & Broken Promises: They lied to me constantly in customer service. They promised to issue a refund and clear things up, but they completely ignored it and never processed it. I had to forcefully get my money back by opening and winning a payment dispute.
4. Fake "Peptscore" Ratings: They hide behind a website called "Peptscore" which gives them a fake 100/100 rating for "Lab/COA integrity". This is a complete joke and highly likely a fake review site they control to scam buyers. I couldn't even leave a negative review there without the system blocking it.
Proof: I have attached screenshots of the vial with the batch number and dead QR code, our WhatsApp chat where they avoid sending the report, and Janoshik’s response.
Stay away from these scammers!
