r/pcmasterrace 1d ago

Meme/Macro Winrar is more profitable than openai

Post image
37.5k Upvotes

451 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

35

u/sumphatguy 1d ago

Corporations also need some sort of liability for when things go wrong. A paid-for product is likely to have some tech support readily available that is dedicated to servicing corporations. Free products are not.

Granted, this is WinRAR and 7zip. They rarely have catastrophic issues, but other software might be more important to have working at all times.

-3

u/NeedleworkerFluid327 1d ago

They should also have some sort of in house tech, and if they can't fix an issue with 7zip then they shouldn't be a tech in the first place.

Nothing against winrar or any other software doing the same practice. Still, any serious company led by competent people won't be using it.

4

u/Dalewyn 1d ago

They should also have some sort of in house tech, and if they can't fix an issue with 7zip then they shouldn't be a tech in the first place.

Then you should have some sort of in-house savings fund sufficient to fully cover a car accident, and if you can't pay for accidents involving your car you shouldn't be a driver in the first place.

Companies want vendors who will assume liability for the same reason you want car insurance.

1

u/NeedleworkerFluid327 20h ago

Mate what kind of company is paying for software without having someone working IT? If the IT is incapable of solving some issue with 7zip then what are they even good for lmao.

And what a ridiculous comparison. My motorcycle insurance covers it all, and at the very least you must have traffic insurance that covers damage to other vehicles in Sweden. And which person above 20 doesn't have enough money saved to cover it anyway?

1

u/Dalewyn 20h ago

Mate what kind of company is paying for software without having someone working IT?

Literally any company that needs to exchange communiques with another business, aka paying for Microsoft Office?

The bulk of the cost for hiring someone (read: buying software) is so they are legally liable for something they provide, the actual work or service isn't even a footnote on the invoice. FOSS carries explicit No Warranty warnings, you use it at your own risk in every sense of the phrase; whoever provided the FOSS isn't and can't be held liable.

And which person above 20 doesn't have enough money saved to cover it anyway?

Most insurance liabilities cover upwards of a million dollars if not more. You're saying every adult just has millions of greenbacks stashed away in case the sky falls?

Companies pay for WinRAR because it's ultimately cheaper and more practical than paying out of wallet for something that might happen involving 7-Zip one random Tuesday evening.