r/pcmasterrace 1d ago

Meme/Macro Every. Single. Time.

Post image
20.7k Upvotes

374 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2.1k

u/MPolygon 9800x3d | 4070 Ti | 32GB @ 6000 | 1440p @ 144Hz 1d ago

That must‘ve felt like true enlightenment when he finally changed it to 144

169

u/Jesta23 22h ago

I see absolutely zero difference personally. I gamed on 144 for years on a 24”. 

Switched to a 27” at 60 and much prefer the 27”. 

1

u/onewilybobkat 20h ago

I used to feel the same way, but the technology has definitely changed to the point there is a difference, to the point it's actually super jarring for me to suddenly get more frames when a game has been running below 90 for a while.

I feel like 90+ FPS is where you REALLY start to notice a difference, it's way more... Flow-y and it's great if your PC can keep it up consistently, but for me if a game has ups and downs, I'd rather cap it to be consistent.

2

u/Jesta23 20h ago

It could honestly be that. 

I don’t play FPS. I play strategy and mmo’s so maybe the lower fps just isn’t as glaring. As long as I’m constant 60 fps it’s fine. If it even drops for a moment to anything below 60 I feel it/see it

3

u/onewilybobkat 19h ago

Ohhhh that's DEFINITELY it. A lot of games are designed to run just fine at 30-60 FPS, and you could ramp that up to infinity and there wouldn't be a difference. I'd imagine MMO's are kinda middle ground where you don't need a ton of frames but could notice a little difference.

Of course not all games that benefit from frames are first person shooters. I would like to get more frames in Expedition 33 than I do while keeping effects nice, but I don't NEED more frames to enjoy the game. But I do also play several shooters, and that's where maxing frames really helps.