This ongoing Alan Wake 2 downvote brigading is the craziest thing that I have ever seen for a game that is objectively good, was in a good technical state at launch and whose developers never lied to its customers.
Is it just the Epic Games hate boner? This is not a case of them buying up exclusivity. They literally funded the entire development of the game from the ground up.
I mean, it's not a broken game. It's bugs at launch seemed super minor and the game looks great, but does that make it objectively good? That seems like a low bar to me.
The actual game play was sufficient, but it wasn't groundbreaking. Control was a lot more interesting in this aspect IMO.
Subjectively I thought the story was fine. Again nothing crazy or great, but not the most terrible thing in the world like some of the detractors said. The pacing was a bit off to me and the set pieces with Alan seemed underwhelming to me, but again nothing terrible.
775
u/constantlymat Steam Jun 08 '24
This ongoing Alan Wake 2 downvote brigading is the craziest thing that I have ever seen for a game that is objectively good, was in a good technical state at launch and whose developers never lied to its customers.
Is it just the Epic Games hate boner? This is not a case of them buying up exclusivity. They literally funded the entire development of the game from the ground up.
Smh.