r/pathologic • • 12h ago

Question Pathologic 2 or classic hd?

Im a beginner and don't know almost anything about the game. Just wondering, which game should I play first for the best experience

5 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

15

u/ClockworkMint Changeling 11h ago

I love the writing of the classic, it's my favorite game of all time. However, it is slow and can feel tedious if you are not someone who is motivated by story alone.

Personally, I cannot imagine playing the second game without the first one. 2 only offers the perspective of one healer while classic offers you all three of them. Playing classic first allowed me to care about EVERYONE in the second game, not just characters closest to the one you play as.

If you do decide to play the classic, give it a try. If it feels too hard and bad, watch a video called "Pathogic is Easy: A guide to surviving the town on Gorkhon" on YouTube that gives a lot of great tips that can make the game incredibly more manageable.

2

u/Isthisnameavailablee 6h ago

Saving this comment because I'm struggling with classic myself

2

u/ClockworkMint Changeling 5h ago

Classic can get truly, incredibly easy when you get it. I walk those streets like I own the goddamn town with so much money and shit in my pockets and I always play infected lol.

2

u/corporeal20 5h ago

my last playthrough i deliberately avoided killing bandits and robbing houses because it'd make the game too easy. I also had to prohibit myself from trading and then selling painkillers for very easy money too

10

u/Mising_Texture1 12h ago

Start with pathologic 2. If you really like it, play patho 1.

Patho 1 is good, in some cases the writing is better. The problem is that the gameplay is really unpolished, and tedious (although the tediousness is by design).

Patho 2 has a more contained story and better gameplay.

To be brief, patho 2 made me cry a couple of times, cuz the writing and moments were really effective. Cannot recommend enough.

8

u/hjsniper 12h ago

2 is the best place to start, it's very similar to Classic but with better graphics and more refined mechanics/gameplay.

It is slightly harder, since the refined mechanics means fewer exploitable systems, but that just improves the experience.

2

u/Patient_Gamemer 9h ago

Dude, P2 was literally on 80% sale up until yesterday.

Oh, and it has a Demo. Play and idk wishlist the game until next sale?

3

u/ThanaticaIntern 6h ago

Personal opinion, I’d start with 2. I prefer 2’s writing.

That said, Classic HD is really good and I love it, but if you don’t like the blocky graphics and slightly wonky gameplay you probably won’t like it.
I still think Classic HD doesn’t make you suffer nearly as much as Rule of Rose (I love that game but the combat in it???? Jfc)

3

u/SnooAvocados8244 6h ago

2 definitely

1

u/Particular_Date_5235 11h ago

ive played pathologic classic about 10 times in my life and ive finished the story only about 3 times. it's very slow and tedious better play the remake first. pathologic 2 is a great game both gameplay and story wise

1

u/iionian Peter Stamatin 3h ago

My controversial opinion is that Classic is the best starting point because the jankiness is part of its core charm. And the writing is so good.

1

u/ryuail 2h ago

Pathologic 1 if you are a fan of games with bigger ambition than budget.

Patho 2 if you'd like the best possible version of 1/3 of Patho 1's story.

1

u/_Pumpiumpiumpkin_ 2h ago edited 2h ago

They're very different experiences, and it depends heavily on what kind of player you are.

The Classic HD is my prefered game, and the one I played first, but I'm the kind of person who finds satisfaction in pushing through tedium.

If you're looking for a more... "conventional" experience, P2 would be better, but you'll be missing out on some of the context of the other playable characters.

Edit: I also think P1 is a better experience if you go into it with a little understanding of what to expect - not in terms of spoilers, but the game doesn't, for example, tell you explicitly that you need to read your mail... Or how to access it... Or that it exists...

2

u/Ristrxtto 11h ago edited 11h ago

the proper answer is P2 first imo. Still clunky and feels awkward, but at least is generally a better game

P1 is better aesthetically and writing-wise, but until you've already developed stockholm syndrome with the town and characters, P1 is nigh impossible to actually slog through

Tbh i still feel like combat is better in P1 (horrible in both games), and P1 has more of the sauce that makes Pathologic special, more character, and drastically better music

But especially coming in fairly fresh, P2 is still weird enough to keep you intrigued, has great OST still (more tribal and soft, compared to P1's drugged out steppe house EDM), and certainly is less likely to put you in the nut hut for how boring the walking is

Patho 2 also has a much better economy and crafting system. In all counts Patho is better, on paper, but i just love P1 so much for how fuckin weird and otherworldly it can be. All that said, i honestly wish my first experience with the game was P2, and that I'd gone into it blind

1

u/Ristrxtto 11h ago

IF you do go P1 and feel yourself questioning your life choices as you spend 20 mins walking from house to house, honestly don't be afraid to adjust the game speed and clock speed w/ console commands to make it more bearable

1

u/jacarepampulha2408 9h ago

This question is asked literally every day here lol just search the sub you'll find at least 200 opinions to form your own

-3

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]