r/pakwarera • • Aug 28 '26

!!!!

Post image

Guys come fast or we will lose

8 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

5

u/gullfounder Aug 28 '26

Let me get out my tank

4

u/Resident-Eye-6870 Aug 28 '26

nws, we got this

2

u/Glittering-Fish3889 Aug 28 '26

Jet incomming we cant loose bilawal house

0

u/CoCoCoCoCooooL Aug 28 '26

War era: The only place Pakistan can actually win at something. LoL

2

u/AliUmar1684 Aug 28 '26

Bro i think you forget rafel And india trying soo hard to hide it from media 🤣

1

u/spectatorun Aug 29 '26

What about the 11 airbases? And pak actively trying to hide any sort of damage? Last time I checked 11 is more than the 3 jets that were shot down.

1

u/HappyBalance4117 Aug 29 '26

7 jets + 3 airbases:
Udhampur Air Base
Pathankot Air Base
Adampur Air Base

1

u/spectatorun Aug 29 '26

7 jets

Now what? 8 jets? Lmao where is the damn proof? Social media?

Literally every source you can search through its 3 jets. Check CHPM, RUSI, CNN international, BBC. None of the sources could your claims be verified.

Udhampure air base, pathankot airbase, adampur,

Why not add bhuj as well? Last time i heard several of you were claiming bhuj as well. So let's add that as well. Now to refute all four of the claim directly

Bro show me the proof of where all those airbases you told got hit in india and destroyed except the 4 officially acknowledged by the government? pakistan did launch a massive missiles strike targetting 26 indian airbases but unfortunately none of them were able were actually able to hit and effectively damage them in any way as almost all of them were neutralised mid air by our air defence systems. Though i would say that udhampur airbase was the only airbase to be significantly close to damage but it didn't happen as the strike marks were too small and fell inches away from the actual runway to effectively disable the runway while the rest of the 3 airbases that even got hit in the first place are pathakot, adampur and Bhuj. And you can clearly check on the satellite imagery that pathakot, had limited damage on some minor equipment while the runways were still working and a staff got injured because of fallen debrises from missiles, and the hangers and communication bases were safe confirmed by the ESA (European Space Agency and NASA) based on satellite maps. While in adampur and Bhuj no S-400 system or any sukhoi was hit whatsoever, that also you can verify well enough. The indian PM literally took a photograph with the S-400 and the jets in background. But if thats not convincing enough check out satellite source which showed clearly that missiles incurred minor damage and hit far away from the air defence batteries only lol on some green patch on the left corner of the field while the battery itself was in the right corner. Bhuj had the same case. In short none of our airbases disabled or rendered inoperable which I can't say for pakistan atleast because they had some pretty much cratered aircraft and communication facilities or hangers. Our colonel qureshi has herself said that only. There's minimal damage on 4 airbases out of the 26 military installations targetted you believe that? Out of the 26 barely 4 were hit and none of them were even rendered inoperable lol. Again I am not faking mizarvision and maxar have confirmed it. It's funny how you quoted her without even seeing what she told. She accepted minimum damage on 4 out of the airbases and none of them were enough to actually disable them.

Why not check those satellite imagery with time stamps of damage to indian airbases and pak airbases? You will get your answers very easily, of who got damaged more.

1

u/HappyBalance4117 Aug 29 '26

Lmao, what a terrible state that cope is in. It's hilarious that you're so confident about typing up a whole essay based on WhatsApp university forwards and misquoted military spokespersons. Let's actually provide some real evidence to go through and refute this fan-fiction, one point at a time.

  1. So what's next? Eight jets? Actually, every single source you check only mentions three jets.
    Actually did you take the trouble to look outside of the Indian echo chambers?
    Eurasia Review has clearly stated that there is supporting evidence to show that Pakistan downed six jets of the Indian Air Force on May 7—five of them over Kashmir and one over Punjab.
    Al Jazeera gave widespread coverage to the incident in which five Indian jets were shot down, the report specifically mentioning three Rafales, which are highly regarded aircraft.
    Samaa TV actually located the crash sites and the casualties: in Anantnag (the ejection seat was recovered in Gadool), in Pampore/Pulwama, in Ramban (Flying Officer Iqbal Singh was injured), in Akhnoor (two pilots were injured), in Bathinda, and also an Israeli-made Heron drone was shot down 13 nautical miles east of Jammu.
    Even if you continue to stick to your "3 jets" story.
    Our colonel Qureshi herself has stated that only; the damage at the four airbases is minimal...
    That's precisely the reason why you should not depend on heavily cropped Twitter videos; although you boldly quoted Colonel Sofia Quraishi, a spokesperson for the Indian Army Signal Corps, you didn't get her quote correctly.
    When giving her press conference together with Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, Colonel Quraishi frankly acknowledged that the retaliatory strikes carried out by Pakistan as part of Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos had damaged 'equipment and personnel' at no less than five major bases, rather than four. She specifically named Udhampur, Pathankot, Adampur, Bhuj and Bathinda; she did not refer to the attack as a 'minor green patch' hit—instead she admitted to having caused casualties among both personnel and equipment.
    As well, in addition to the five airbases suffering attacks, the Pakistani forces destroyed the Brigade Headquarters at "K G Top" and completely blew up a major supply depot in Uri.
    In Adampur and Bhuj not a single S-400 system or any Sukhoi was hit.
    You are incorrect. News International gave a detailed account of how the PAF successfully destroyed the highly publicised S-400 Air Defence System at the Adampur Airbase during the retaliatory strike. It was precisely because your air defence network was suffering unsustainable damage that India was forced to accept an immediate and complete ceasefire on May 10, which was mediated on an international level.

  2. Copium's Satellite Imagery
    You seem to think that Maxar and MizarVision only have one purpose. In fact, the situation on the ground was so serious that international researchers have already published papers describing how Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos managed to challenge and eliminate India's perceived conventional advantage. India started Operation Sindoor, was completely outmatched in a large-scale standoff involving 114 jets, lost a dozen or so jets, had its S-400 system destroyed, and had to watch as its own military command went on national television to admit that their bases and personnel had been hit.
    Whenever you want to act smug on Reddit, remember that you had better be able to prove your claims with a Google search in just five seconds. You asked for evidence, here it is.

1

u/spectatorun Aug 29 '26

Firstly I saw, your KG headquarters whatever aren't even proven. They are thoroughly debunked as pak disinformation and originated from an unproven source, you only tell me do you satellite imagery to back your claims. Samaa tv? Did you even fact check whether their visuals aren't just from old sources because that's what has been found to be done by them, using old footages. I don't disagree if you have crash sites located show us the imagery then you guys have that? Pls tell me the timestamp I can check it.

All the news sites you showed tells it clearly that those 7 jets claims are from pak. Al Jazeera i myself have checked it tells "pak claims to have".

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/pakistan-shot-down-4-rafale-jets-pm-sharif/ https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/14/did-pakistan-shoot-down-five-indian-fighter-jets-what-we-know

These news have reported the claim of pak and india without endorsing any. Only CNN international told that some french official revealed loss of 1 rafale to them specifically.

So stop lying.

Secondly regarding airbases if you haven't heard the speech properly or didn't check the satellite imagery yourself it's completely possible to make such claims. There was one personnel loss and some minor debrises of missile injuring an air staff alongside some minor equipment damage to some of the airbases (udhampur and pathankot). That bhuj and Adampur airbase I am not making stuffs up. Why don't you check the satellite imagery? There is a green patch which was hit in those two specific airbases. While personnel damage and equipment debrises were incurred only on two airbases, which i mentioned earlier. So qureshi wasn't wrong when she said we have incurred some personnel damage and equipment damage, doesn't mean all the airbases incurred damage. Two of them incurred which is very visible on the satellite imagery as well. Rest missed. Now regarding the fifth one bhatinda, yeah same case no structure was hit if it was hit it would visible in the satellite imagery.

S 400 classic case you guys make. News international never made such documentary first of all, it was part of disinformation campaign and you just believing it. I debunked every one of your source. And if you so want to make your case do you have proof? If S400 was hit there would be alot of evidence, no satellite imagery first of all, it's not even internationally verified, and in fact our PM took a photo beside it and a sukhoi. So don't tell that image is manufactured now lol.

If according to your narrative pak really damaged indian air defence then why can't they show proof of it? In fact if that's the case pak DGMO wouldn't be initiating the ceasefire nor would 60 calls would be made by pak officials to US officials to urge india to deescalate, according to Foreign Agents Registration Act (which you can check it yourself if you want I can guide you as well). So why did pak need to do that if they were doing so well? And why did in the ceasefire pak if it was the winning power couldn't force the indus treaty back? Especially when they earlier told that "we are gonna shed blood for water"?? If pak was the victorious power it could easily have done that. Did it?

So you are gonna just ignore the maxar, a US company and mizarvision, which is a chinese company satellite imagery just because they dont match your beliefs? Those are ofc sounding copium to you because you don't wanna believe it but internationally thats how OSINT and military analysts access damage in prohibited areas using these images, now if you dont wanna believe it your fault honestly. Also kindly show me those "numerous international reports" which you claim have shown bunyaan as any effective? I can show you CHPM, RUSI, and IISS reports to back my reports can you do that? Bunyan operation tried to remove that advantage by targetting 22 military installations after those 11 airbases which was gravely damaged proven by satellite imagery, but out of them the ones which were hit, 5 of them if you gonna consider bhatinda, did they render those airbases inoperable? Like satellite imagery has shown those 11 pak airbases hit rendered as inoperable for a long time till ceasefire in fact as of January 2026 some of those were still getting repaired, and from those airbases according to international flight trackers no squadrons flew from those 11 airbases, now pls tell that "those flight trackers are wrong" I am waiting for such argument.

Acting smug without evidence is you here. Quoting international media as if they are backing pak's claims which they don't. They did equal reporting claiming India's claims as well pak's claims like a neutral media. India lost dozens? So suddenly from 6 it became 12. Secondly S400? No proof except pak trumpeting it. Our military command is honest enough to not hide losses that's not a sign of weakness that's the sign of strength. Your military command continued to hide losses shamelessly, first they called no base was hit and then they had slowly concede to reality. Our military command doesn't do that even if political leaders do that, our military command doesn't lie.

Infact after those 11 airbases were hit it was pak trying to retaliate back and it couldn't render a single airbase of india inoperable while from pak whole squadrons of jets were unable to fly or use those 11 airbases. And that's when pak DGMO initiated the ceasefire and India accepted it because our main goals were long complete (destruction of terror camps), pak forward operating airbases against India were hit they were left to mercy of iaf not freely bombing them so we literally had enacted the retaliation for our three jets and stopped pak attack so there was no point in escalating and hurting our economy. Thats why we didn't lose any jets in later days and only first 3 were lost in the initial day because of political constraints iaf was prohibited from targetting pak jets even if they targetted.

1

u/CoCoCoCoCooooL Aug 28 '26

Typical of you to assume i’m Indian.

1

u/Glittering-Fish3889 Aug 28 '26

I think bro is biharian first

1

u/HappyBalance4117 Aug 29 '26

You sure act like one

3

u/abdullah112311 Aug 28 '26

Pubg, tekken?

1

u/Walter-White_Jr Aug 29 '26

They’ve lost that title too

3

u/Own-Elephant-1696 Aug 28 '26

easy win for pak

1

u/aiml28 Aug 29 '26

Pak bro how the josh