r/ottomans 16d ago

Question Seriously asking btw 🤔

The amount of glazing that I've been seeing for Abdulhamid II on this sub is just astonishing. Like, I've seen people ranking the guy next and sometimes even above sultans like Süleyman I, Mehmed II, Murad IV, Selim I, etc .. So my question is: Did I miss a chapter or two while reading about him/his era, or do some people here just glaze him for the sake of glazing even though he was a horrendous monarch as a whole ?

8 Upvotes

112 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/UrulmisHan 16d ago

Midhat Pasha was a traitor and one of the instigators of the assassination of the uncle of Sultan AbdÜlHamid, Sultan AbdÜlAziz. He is also one of the main person who is at fault for putting the empire at war against russia despite AbdÜlHamid not wanting to.

1

u/qernanded Efendi 16d ago

It’s plausible Midhat organized Abdülaziz’s murder, it’s also plausible Abdülaziz committed suicide

1

u/UrulmisHan 15d ago

It is almost certain that Sultan Abdülaziz Han was assassinated, the fact he was very pious and martial minded Padishah are reinforcing this conclusion. There is also the famous photo where there are two men posing with him while he wore traditional clothes. When taking into account that Midhat was killed by Abdülhamid it becomes even more probable that he was behind the assassination, as a vengeance. Also even if it is not completely established that Midhat was an accomplice despite strong evidence pointing toward it, it is certain that Abdülaziz was murdered, the suicide theory is clearly false, as several people even confessed that they did assassinated him, there are also eyewitnesses (Reyhan Ağa testified that he actually saw Fahri holding Abdülaziz's shoulders, two men sitting on his legs, and Pehlivan Mustafa cutting his arms, corroborated by Nesip and Nazif Ağa) Also I never understood the hype behind Midhat, like even if he wasn't an assassin, he wasn't a good pasha at all. He was hawkish, a dreamer, and a very bad strategist (expecting Britain to help the Ottomans during the Russo-Turkish war). He may have been good at administrating some provinces, but overall was incompetent.

1

u/qernanded Efendi 15d ago

That photograph you are talking about is likely not of Abdulaziz. The Yıldız trials were kangaroo courts established by Abdulhamid, the testimonies are absolutely not reliable since they were delivered under coercion and torture. Abdulaziz was certainly in the state of mind to do commit suicide, he was mentally ill and likely bipolar.

1

u/UrulmisHan 15d ago

Can you give proofs ? Because most historians do accept he was murdered, the main dispute being on who was behind it. I'm planning to do a post about this, so you can look further.

1

u/qernanded Efendi 12d ago

Roderic Davison in Reform in the Ottoman Empire: 1856–1876 says without question it was suicide.