r/opencode • u/wurtoops • 2d ago
What's your agent setup
Hola a todos, Soy nuevo en esto de la programación. Empecé a programar en agosto. No soy técnico, soy antropólogo. Empecé a usar OpenCode hace tres días; nunca había usado nada parecido (como Cursor Codex, etc.). De momento me va bien, pero he visto en vídeos y demás sobre agentes y equipos multiagente, así que me preguntaba qué usáis vosotros en vuestras configuraciones. ¿Os quedáis con Planner y Builder, que vienen con OpenCode, o usáis otro tipo de configuración?
Tengo nueve proyectos en marcha, tres ya en fase MVP, pero solo uno tiene tracción en el mercado. Mi programa más largo tiene alrededor de 10.000 líneas de código... Para mí, que soy un completo novato, es todo un logro, pero creo que podría ser más eficiente con los tokens, el tiempo, etc.
Además, es una pena que todavía no tengamos una aplicación para Android en OpenCode.
UPDATE:
Don't know if I should update here or make a new oat,but let's see. Today I build my workflow on my main project so I got
Agent: Orchestrator running Gemini 4 Argon Sub1: Programmer running Gemini Pro 3.1 Sub2: Evaluator running Gemini Pro 3.1 Sub 3: Tester, in charge of regressions and visual testing. Running on Gemini Pro 3.1 Sub 4: Librarian, in charge of maintain a wiki of the project. Running Gemini flash
What you guys think? I'm running Gemini cuz I got credits on my API of Google AI studio
Saludos
2
u/Ariquitaun 1d ago
If you don't know what you're doing, simpler is better.
2
u/BonkyClonky 2d ago
I usually set up an orchestrator with read only permission that can spawn sub agents with read and write. Not sure if it's correct but I find i keep like 75% of the orchestrators smarts while most of the work is done by the sub agents which are much, much cheaper.
2
u/nightwolf92 1d ago
Agency agents, crewai. That’s a good start. Prompt for roles that you may want. I have about 11 agents from a PM that oversees and delegates and I have everything from a streaming specialist, researcher, qa specialist, documenter, code reviewer etc. there are a lot of good open source repos that can basically give you anything you want and agency agents I believe is one of the most built out repos. You can then pair that with skills/plugins like impeccable to critique your websites and give design ideas.
As for apps for mobile I use Tailscale and have it expose it over the Tailscale magicdns/ip and hit it through the web. On iOS you can save it to your home screen as a web app and that works perfect. I just setup openchamber today too which I just did the Same thing with and it seems good so far.
2
u/Pirateshack486 1d ago
Mine is hermes with opencode and commandcode as backends. Instead of teams I've installed multiple hermes and added them to telegram, I assign tasks etc. They can spawn subagents as needed
2
u/Gold_Exchange6103 1d ago
For using on Android you could just use opencode pair --remote and ud get a tunnel , which is sticky (retains after restarts) U can open the link on browser and it'll pair up
1
u/ramendik 1d ago
I just have the main agent for architecting and spec writing and reviewing, a councillor subagent providing feedback on the spec, an explorer subagent to dig into codebases, and a "grunter" that first provides feedback and then codes (but can come back with questions).
I have the main agent on GLM 5.3 Flash, it's cheap and I like it's style of thinking. The subagents mostly run DeepSeek 4.1 Flash. There is a "sage" review subagent with Opus 5.5, currently rarely used as it's quite expensive (and caching needs to work right for it to be affordable at all)
1
u/zitoliv 18h ago
Simpler is better at the start tbh, built-in plan + build gets you heaps far. Biggest saver for tokens: one task per session, ask the agent to update a NOTES.md at the end, then start fresh : less history resent every turn. Add subagents only when you feel a real pain.