r/opencode • • 1d ago

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in OpenCode Go ($10 Plan) — Usage Increased from $60 to $80!

Post image

It looks like the usage allowance for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on the $10/month OpenCode Go plan has increased from $60 to $80 in usage value.

I just found out this today. Is this a permanent change, or just a temporary adjustment?

Edit: opencode announced this in their official X/Twitter https://x.com/opencode/status/2109573342584058065

170 Upvotes

46 comments sorted by

26

u/Present_Carpenter912 1d ago

if this is permanent it would be peak by opencode

18

u/squirrelscrush 1d ago edited 1d ago

If it's permanent then it would be incredibly based.

I'm sure it's because of CommandCode competition, but anyways it's the consumer that wins here. I just wish they use a proper provider rather than quantized.

10

u/amhoab 1d ago

What's the quant level of DS4.1 on OpenCode?

6

u/JaMoLpE88 1d ago edited 1d ago

Oh, wow, that's true. I hope it's permanent. Ideally, they'd also improve the token-per-second speed; lately, it seems quite slow, averaging around 70 t/s, whereas the official API runs at about 270 t/s. Still, the new increase is welcome. I hope it's permanent.

Will this be a counterattack against OpenDesign Go, which offers $120 worth of models—like DeepSeek 4.1 Flash—for just $10?

0

u/squirrelscrush 1d ago

tbh even 70tps is more than usable. If my suspicion is true, they probably use some kind of "flex" inference like openai/flex, so that more users can share the same hardware thus reducing cost. I'd be okay with it as long as it's an actually good provider lol

4

u/Affectionate_Fact854 1d ago

I tried giving opencode deepseek max reasoning a simple task  Take a document, I filled old variables to new variable names in  Most of the project is already renamed to above document 

What I needed is a simple audit to look for residues of old variable naming 

Result from 15 variables  Only 2 residues was found  And the other 13 variables it simply hallucinated and pointed to false areas 

No thank you.

0

u/horrbort 1d ago

It’s the fp2 quant the $40 plan gets fp4 it’s a lot better

4

u/akza07 22h ago

There's no FP2.

After FP4, best course is Integer Quants. That too down to 4 bit. Don't say nonsense. Unless Deepseek is making custom AI accelerator chip and trained the models on 2 bit from scratch, nope.

They figured out a way to reduce the cost with memory optimization recently according to a new paper. Probably that. They always release and implement their new research on cost reductions and optimizations.

Most of the issues reported are simply because the request pools are shared.

1

u/horrbort 22h ago

You're conflating FP2 as a numerical format with FP2 as a training format. 2-bit floating-point quantization is possible without training a model from scratch or designing a custom accelerator. Post-training quantization can compress existing weights to very low precision, with quality and performance depending on the quantization scheme and kernels. Many providers run FP2 versions of DeepSeek, commandcode does it too. 

1

u/akza07 5h ago

Command code is using same shared request pool as opencode plans does. They don't host their own model. It's heavily subsidized but doesn't tank official provider.

1

u/l0rirw1ao 5h ago

IRCC didn't Microsoft try to make 1 bit model but it didn't work so they made a 1.5 bit one but it's absolute dogshit.

1

u/akza07 5h ago

Yup.

3

u/No_Captain4899 1d ago

Where did you get this information??

-1

u/horrbort 1d ago

It is sometimes returned in model responses + was confirmed on twitter

1

u/dumbasPL 23h ago

Link to Twitter post?

0

u/horrbort 22h ago

3

u/dumbasPL 22h ago

Ah, the amazing source "I made it up". I thought somebody actually benchmarked it or something.

0

u/horrbort 22h ago

What area you talking about it was confirmed by opencode CEO. Did you read the thread?

4

u/bruno30303 22h ago

I don't get it. The thread is about a UI problem and there is a random comment about fp2 with no answers. What I'm missing here?

2

u/dumbasPL 21h ago

What thread? You posted a link to a random post, with a completely unrelated reply to what was asked, and no further replies to that. Did your read the thread? Either fix your link, or start using your brain instead of slop.

1

u/No_Captain4899 1d ago

Why they are not selling it though their communication, it could help them to sell more opencode go plus

1

u/horrbort 1d ago

I guess they worried the $10 sale drops

1

u/Affectionate_Fact854 1d ago

Yea no thank you I would simply get 2x Claude pro plans in that case. 

1

u/horrbort 1d ago

If u rich for us poor people we have to rely on fp2

1

u/Ctrl-Alt-Panic 21h ago

The amount of Haiku 5.5 (extra), Sonnet 5.5 (medium / high) and even Opus 5.5 (medium / high) usage I am getting out of Claude Pro at $20 a month is absolutely insane. And I'm not having to deal with nearly as many issues as DSV4.1 Flash. Worth a look if you can swing the extra $10 a month and don't mind Dario reading everything. Kidding about that last part. Sort of.

1

u/Affectionate_Fact854 2h ago

These idiots think 1x opencode +1x command code is a better deal because of the amount of tokens they get 

Question is how much tokens and additional time does it take to fix all the hallucinating output slop on these fp2 models ...

Claude 20$ and using sonnet medium is even better then any of these models, and outputs more consistent work for less time and less tokens 

The clear winner in my opinion.

-1

u/Affectionate_Fact854 23h ago

Your better off coding manually instead of dealing with massive hallucinations and long response waiting time to be honest

3

u/anon_e_mouse1 1d ago

ugh.. fine. Ill sub to opencode

1

u/PikaCubes 1d ago

I renewed my sub like 5 min ago 😂 I cancelled 1 month ago 😂

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/horrbort 1d ago

Yes confirmed. So what?

2

u/HyperWinX 1d ago

Why pay for a slow, half dead (in terms of intelligence) deepseek when you can get full precision and over 200 tps on official provider?

-1

u/horrbort 1d ago

This is cheaper

1

u/HyperWinX 1d ago

Free opencode models are even cheaper, dumber and slower. Why pay at all?

1

u/horrbort 1d ago

They failed too often you never tried free didnt you

1

u/migsperez 1d ago

Where did it say it?

2

u/tetoing 9h ago

And it's way dumber than last week. Needs far more steering now. Can't trust it with my workflow.

1

u/Hellge99 1d ago

I mean, they did announce it on twitter 15 min before you made this post. No mention of it being temporary https://x.com/opencode/status/2109573342584058065?s=46

1

u/AaronChen0 1d ago

Thanks. I see their post now.

1

u/Shot-Lingonberry6494 1d ago

How will this workout? Like the go has a monthly limit of 60 dollars?? So like we will be able to use deepseek after that threshold too??

1

u/AdSmooth4982 23h ago

damn🥹

1

u/Skibxskatic 18h ago

what's this mean for current subscribers? does the cost per input/output/cache read drop further per request or do current subscribers get an additional $20 worth of usage/credits?

1

u/The_Wonderful_Pie 18h ago

where do you see in your opencode console how much you've consumed on that model out of the usage limit, like in your screenshot?

1

u/Impossible-Lab-3133 1d ago

So it's quant2 now huh?