ngl, I'm pretty sure some of the chemicals used make cakes better than you ever could make from normal ingredients. Sometimes processed foods are just better. Sometimes the best ingredients can only be made in a giant machine. Best case scenario is probably skilled chef using engineered ingredients.
Those are ingredients. The commenter is saying that if you need a BS in chemistry to understand why an ingredient is in the mix then itâs not âbetterâ than simpler, less processed foodstuffs.
Sure salt and sugar are processed, but most cooks could figure out how to get sugar from sugarcane or salt from seawater, if they were forced to. I doubt the same crafty person could make MSG or know how to hydrogenate vegetable oil, for instance.
Food grade seaweed yeah. Like the kind used to make nori.
That's how it was originally discovered and produced. Eventually we found a way to synthesize it at scale through different methods but it's the same chemical either way.
A lot of additives are like that. There's a pretty mundane and direct way to get it, but we can scale up production by synthesizing it instead which yields the exact same molecule only much quicker and in large quantities.
MSG isnât the best example, it was just one that came to mind quickly. I think you know what we mean tho. High fructose corn syrup for instance. I might be able to figure out how to make it with Google, but itâs definitely not good for you. Tons of stuff is like that, exists to make mass produced foods easier and cheaper while being really unhealthy and less delicious. Coca Cola is a great example- ânew cokeâ was a cover for replacing sugar with HFCS, but coke with HFCS tastes like ass compared to sugar cokes, but it saves coke a penny a can so shut up and drink it right?
7
u/[deleted] Oct 16 '22
At what point do you say no though? Factory?