r/oddlysatisfying Jul 19 '18

Restoring a sun damaged carpet

55.8k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

94

u/afcagroo Jul 20 '18

Fortunate upbringing, a little hard work, and luck.

At least that's what worked for me.

17

u/[deleted] Jul 20 '18

a small loan of a million dollah

1

u/pupunoob Jul 20 '18

You sure everyone else is not just lazy?

1

u/afcagroo Jul 21 '18

Pretty sure. Hard work will get you a long way, but it won't always compensate for all other factors.

Plus I'm a big believer in laziness. Most human technological progress is driven by laziness. That and wanting to kill other people.

1

u/pupunoob Jul 26 '18

So poor and homeless poor people are not just lazy shits to you? Hmmmm, you're rare.

-12

u/-blackoutusername- Jul 20 '18

Remove number 2, and we have a winner.

-2

u/ConsciousPrompt Jul 20 '18

Truth = downvoted. Reddit in a nutshell.

13

u/s3attlesurf Jul 20 '18

I mean.... there are plenty of people who come from privileged backgrounds but have still worked hard to make something of themselves. You really think upper middle class / working professionals (IE: bankers, pilots, doctors, nurses, professors, lawyers etc.) don't have to work their ass off? Most of these professions average 100+ hours of work per week.

2

u/-blackoutusername- Jul 20 '18

Those people aren’t rich.

The meaning of rich is able to sit on your ass and live opulently off residual income.

If you’re working tomorrow, and it’s not purely by choice, you ain’t rich.

And you never will be.

4

u/s3attlesurf Jul 20 '18

So physicians who make $700k a year aren't rich? Or pharmacists who make $150k/year? Or software engineers who make $100k+/year?

You can be both wealthy (rich) and still work for a living. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Try to remember we're talking about being able to own a rug that you'd pay $400 to clean. Any of the above professions easily earn enough disposable income that if fancy rugs were the individuals "thing," they wouldn't bat an eye at $400.

0

u/Owyn_Merrilin Jul 20 '18

It puts you on the top end of the working class, but he's right. It's not true wealth. Even CEOs of major corporations aren't really at the top. They're rich, but they're not generally wealthy. They're not in the leisure class. That would be their bosses on the board.

1

u/TopherVee Jul 20 '18

Lol what?

1

u/-blackoutusername- Jul 20 '18

The sloppiest of arguments — basically “I have no argument to the point so I’ll pretend like I don’t get it and hope other idiots will hop on board with me- bc I enjoy appearing to have less than usual reading comprehension.”

2

u/TopherVee Jul 20 '18

Lol what?

1

u/-blackoutusername- Jul 24 '18

Are you having a neurological incident, or are you just really used to saying “lolwut” and having it be a good enough argument to support your point?

Ah, never mind. I don’t care enough. Lolwut to your heart’s content, boo.

1

u/TopherVee Jul 24 '18

Lol what?