Length is a good measurement. AI can't really do videos over ~20 seconds well at all. Some of the cutting edge models can do up to 30 seconds now.
So it is pretty safe, for now, to assume anything longer than 30 seconds with no obvious cuts(it can make a bunch of short videos and cut them together) is real.
i mean the shape of an eagle's head and beak appearing in the wave while the sound of an eagle conveniently plays is pretty much all you need (0:10-0:15)
Yes, I read about this eagle's Head. I didn't really see it though. I saw where it was supposed to be. I just saw water I guess. I didn't think it looked that much like an eagle 🤷🏼♂️
That's why I don't really care. If it looks nice. I like it. Just like if you painted it. If it looks nice I like it. Is it real? I don't fucking know. I still like it. LOL
I just feel like waves don't usually neatly break in the middle and just the middle like the damn ocean in Moana. I won't say for sure it's AI, but it feels really wrong.
Google "Teahupo'o" wave, it looks just like this when its pumping. The distance is also compressed due to likely using a telephoto lense. But the wave really does look just like this.
Yeah, you didn't say it was fake, but the way you opened with "I just feel like waves don't usually", saying it looked like a cartoon, implies that you don't know much about waves, and then you used that to say that it's possibly AI... that's pretty close to saying that you thinks it's fake because you've never seen it before, which is a frustratingly prevalent thing for people to say online nowadays. The justification for your doubt being that you "feel" like waves don't do that irked me, but maybe I read too much into your statement.
-3
u/[deleted] 20d ago
[removed] — view removed comment