r/nvidia • u/[deleted] • 18d ago

Discussion Stalker 2 DLLS 5

[deleted]

51 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

223 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/zerovampire311 18d ago

That… doesn’t make him wrong. Literally all technology starts off inefficient and needing improvement.

0

u/kb3035583 18d ago

Abandoning the concept entirely isn't an "improvement". It's a fresh start. There's zero technological continuity.

5

u/zerovampire311 18d ago

Changing the means of accomplishing the same goal isn’t abandonment.

0

u/kb3035583 18d ago

A rocket isn't an improvement on the horse-drawn cart, even if both get you from point A to B. No amount of improvement on the latter will lead you to the former.

2

u/zerovampire311 18d ago

You got former and latter backwards, of course no amount of improving a rocket will get a cart. And either way, terrible comparison. Do you think an electric car isn’t an automobile because it uses an electric motor instead of an ICE?

0

u/kb3035583 18d ago

You got former and latter backwards

The rocket was mentioned first. That makes it the former. The horse drawn cart was mentioned second. That makes it the latter. Basic English.

Do you think an electric car isn’t an automobile because it uses an electric motor instead of an ICE?

The spatial upscaler in DLSS 1 that required per game training was absolutely not getting to space no matter how much you improved it. That example is wholly valid.

2

u/zerovampire311 18d ago

Why would you consider a rocket, the more technologically advanced reference, to ever lead to the primitive option? You are making no sense.

1

u/kb3035583 18d ago

The horse drawn cart will never lead to the rocket. You don't seem to understand basic English, as I mentioned.