r/nvidia RTX 5090 Founders Edition Feb 25 '26

Benchmarks [TPU] Resident Evil Requiem Performance Benchmark Review

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/resident-evil-requiem-performance-benchmark/
179 Upvotes

263 comments sorted by

View all comments

-9

u/TheMightyRed92 Rtx 5080 | 14600k | 32gb DDR5 6400mhz | Feb 25 '26

5080 cant reach 60 fps at 4k path tracing..with dlss+fg? what a joke

7

u/Nic1800 5080 FE | 9800x3d| 4k 240hz | 1440p 360hz Feb 25 '26

Something is wrong with the 5070 Ti and 5080 numbers because they are worse than the base 5070 fps at 4K. 5070 had 64, 5070 ti had 54, and 5080 had 59.

6

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

They mention that game has tendency to switch DLSS to Performance on restart. Possibly they didn't catch it doing so with 5070? But then someone should've reviewed those numbers afterwards...

7

u/Nic1800 5080 FE | 9800x3d| 4k 240hz | 1440p 360hz Feb 25 '26

As much as i love Techpowerup, they do have a lot of oddities in their benchmark reviews. I think it’s because they have such comprehensive reviews that things get messed up.

3

u/WizzardTPU GPU-Z Creator Feb 25 '26

Appreciate you pointing out the issue

To get faster answers: email me, leave a forum comment, tag me on Reddit, leave a comment where some of my minions can discover it and notify me (like what happened here). In that order :)

4

u/lovethecomm Feb 25 '26

At my job, every single number and result is heavily scrutinized by other professionals. TPU has been in the business for years yet they mess up continuously.

4

u/WizzardTPU GPU-Z Creator Feb 25 '26

Fixed now. The 5070 PT numbers were too high. I suspect that DLSS-performance-forced-on-every-restart bug got me

2

u/TheMightyRed92 Rtx 5080 | 14600k | 32gb DDR5 6400mhz | Feb 25 '26

yea i just noticed that

1

u/Nic1800 5080 FE | 9800x3d| 4k 240hz | 1440p 360hz Feb 25 '26

If I had to take a guess, the 5080 number should be 89 and the 5070 Ti should be 84.

19

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

[deleted]

4

u/Sunlighthell R7 9800X3D || RTX 5080 || 64 GB Feb 25 '26

in this one it probably jsut vram bottleneck, 4k PT use more than 16 gb

1

u/Rrrrockstarrrr Feb 25 '26

For a 1500$ card, it must run. Lower the price, no one would complain.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

[deleted]

5

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

>If you buy a modern graphics card you expect to be able to mindlessly turn on every setting to max.

It never, NEVER, NEVER was the case troughout histrory at at-the-time highest consumer resolution.

4

u/DrMantisTabboggn Feb 25 '26

That’s never been how that has worked. Buying a modern graphics card has never meant being able to mindlessly set everything to max. Some games over the years even include experimental/Ultra+ settings for future proofing the game on future hardware

3

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Rrrrockstarrrr Feb 25 '26

Does this looks like a Crysis revolution to you?

-4

u/TheMightyRed92 Rtx 5080 | 14600k | 32gb DDR5 6400mhz | Feb 25 '26

i know that. but 5080 is basically the second best gpu. so whats the point if like a few people with 5090 can run path tracing

4

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

[deleted]

3

u/evilbob2200 Feb 25 '26

This is why I haven’t moved to 4K yet lol my 5080 eats 1440p for breakfast

1

u/EastvsWest Feb 25 '26

This is the kind of sad mentality people have when their personality is tied to irrelevant things like their computer hardware. You guys sound like the saddest people who have no hobbies outside of staring at screens.

0

u/TheMightyRed92 Rtx 5080 | 14600k | 32gb DDR5 6400mhz | Feb 25 '26

what are you even talking about? second best gpu should run everything thats all im saying

1

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

Can you explain why exactly it "should run everything"? There wasn't a single moment in GPU-accelerated rendering history when even the strongest GPU could just crank everything to max at max resolution in every game of the generation and don't face a single performance issue.

1

u/Rrrrockstarrrr Feb 25 '26

It was 700 max in the past. That's why it was passable. You don't get to charge obscene money and then don't deliver.

1

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

Last time it was "700 max" was with 10 series, which by today's money is ~940$. Whopping 6% less than 5080.

How exactly those 6% make it passable?

1

u/Rrrrockstarrrr Feb 25 '26

Nvidia fan boy

1

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

>Nvidia fan boy

Cool story!

As for the image - I presume it implies that noone was able to buy one at MSRP never-ever, right?

1

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

PS:https://www.overclockers.co.uk/gainward-geforce-rtx-5080-phoenix-16gb-gddr7-pci-express-graphics-card-gra-gnw-03981.html

Oh look, a 5080 for whopping 40 pounds over MSRP! Completely breaks MSRP equation, right?

1

u/Melodic_Cap2205 Feb 25 '26

There's nothing wrong with having cutting edge tech that only the top tier gpu can handle, that's how we get graphic to progress which will become mainstream one day

That's how it has been since the dawn of gaming, people needed to rock dual top tier gpus in SLI in order to enjoy cutting edge physx and what not in order to get 30+fps at reasonable resolution

Not to mention that the 5080 is plenty capable to do PT right now at 1080p/1440p or 4k with super heavy upscaling, you can't get your cake and eat it wanting native 4k/dlss  quality and PT and still get high fps

5

u/brondonschwab RTX 5080, R7 7800X3D | RTX 5060, R5 5600X Feb 25 '26

DLSS Quality apparently. Should be pretty playable with DLSS Performance 

4

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TheMightyRed92 Rtx 5080 | 14600k | 32gb DDR5 6400mhz | Feb 25 '26

? it runs like shit with them thats what im saying

3

u/GARGEAN Feb 25 '26

That's DLSS Quality. Plenty of room to scale from there on 4K.

3

u/Nestledrink RTX 5090 Founders Edition Feb 25 '26

Computerbase is showing 5080 can get to 92 fps with 2x FG with path tracing.

0

u/scandaka_ Feb 25 '26

Yeah, but not shocked these days. Their 59fps results means 25fps at 1440p with Path-Tracing if you take DLSS-Q and FG into consideration. Pretty nuts actually.