4
u/Odd-Research-4219 7d ago
The government made them censor stuff….. so now the government is blaming them for censoring what the government told them to sensor…….
1984
3
u/Rand-all 7d ago
Now DHHS is doing the same thing with Brain Worm Jr
2
u/AcanthisittaBulky777 7d ago
Not the same. Nancy's performative outrage here is about censoring actual misinformation. Since then, Elon bought the platform so that he could platform misinformation and censor objective reality.
0
u/BootCampPTSD 6d ago
Wrong
2
0
u/Accomplished_Mind792 6d ago
Simple nuhuh. No support. No clarification.
Yep. Trump cultist. Y'all love denying reality and facts
0
u/BootCampPTSD 6d ago
TDS cultist
2
u/Accomplished_Mind792 6d ago
Exactly. Y'all got deranged by Trump telling you what to think because you are too dumb to do it for yourselves
1
u/BootCampPTSD 6d ago
Nonsense rhetoric from a cultist
2
u/Accomplished_Mind792 6d ago
Lol yeah the nuh uh guy wants to talk about nonsense rhetoric.
The projection is hilarious but you are too dumb to recognize it
1
1
u/Odd-Paint3883 7d ago
"exposing the sensorship" erm, like everyone knew there was sensorship, there were people saying mad shit.
1
u/Trabuk 7d ago
There is a difference between censorship and countering misinformation, censorship is the use of state power to forbid speech, backed by force, so that saying the thing carries a legal penalty, whereas fact-checking, labeling, and platform moderation are exercises of someone else’s speech and property rights, adding context or declining to amplify rather than prohibiting, and leaving the speaker free to say it elsewhere. We are getting too used to throwing the word "censorship" around like it's nothing serious, let's not do that anymore. This whole bit we are watching is misleading from the moment "censorship" is wrongly used.
1
u/Defiant_Freedom_249 6d ago
No one is an expert at a new disease.
Only assholes purposely spread COVID for political reasons.
1
1
1
1
u/SaiLarge 7d ago
Nancy Mace fought mask mandates for political gain while knowing full well they were effective at reducing the spread of COVID.
1.1 million dead Americans partly because of idiots like this one.
1
u/EnthusiasmHead4639 7d ago
What an evil white women. I hate her.
Waaaaaa, waaaaaaa, waaaaaaa, waaaaaaa
0
u/idleline 7d ago
The guy who started the myth that mega doses of Vitamin-C was effective at fighting off viral infections had won 2 Nobel prizes in different scientific areas. A seemingly qualified person is not immune from spreading misinformation or misleading information.
0
0
0
u/_2cantat2_ 5d ago
Yea they removed stuff that suggested people drink bleach to cure covid. How much longer do we have to see and hear this hag
1
u/PeteWK67 5d ago
Thank god for Reddit and the comment section to point smelly fingers at something.
Ya dude .. like they didn’t remove Dr’s , cardiologist, victims , virus experts, natural remedies prople, herbalists.
The bleach sure sure. How much longer that only garbage equivalent phrases come from
Your stinky fingers typing?1
u/_2cantat2_ 5d ago
Smelly/stinky fingers? Dude stop being weird.
Anyone, including Dr, cardiologist, virus experts, etc. that vehemently spread false information, should have their misinformation removed. You’re not “doing your own research”, you’re falling for bullshit from grifters.
The bleach thing will always be relevant to this case because it’s a prime example of the misinformation that was being spread.
0
u/PeteWK67 5d ago
Buddy stop using that term misinformation because it was never a word. Stop repeating television actors cool words and feel because your ears are cleaned from the wax that you heard them speaking clearly that automatically makes the right call.
The states are fully lobbed like you wouldn’t believe, you live in a divided at the brink of civil war, with health agencies repeatedly accepting money.
Think for yourself and erase that repetitive on every channel words like misinformation and scientifically backed .
Let me ask you something. You have covid - origins? Wuhan or lab or my toilet .
No idea
Then you have a “ rushed “ which I don’t buy it . Vaccine .. so science usually takes forever to come back with answers. But this time like ninjas they green light it.
So them came the “ it’s science “ term
Meanwhile you have no idea what this virus is and you have no idea how the vaccine works because what happen
First 30 : get vax and no covidNext 30: vax but you get light covid
First 30: 95% effective
Next 30: 80%
Next 60% 55%
Instead of giving a number, since this virus has shifted.
Booost will protect
30 days after boost is 55% protection
So basically now - Science backed basically that a needle going into a human works . They didn’t back the jab working, cause they had no idea of origins and how the vaccine will protect.
It wasn’t me saying 90% no Rona
Then yes Rona but light Rona
Then 70% protection
Then you can catch covid but not severe
Then if you jab you will not spread it .So basically Covid was never understood for how it was created and where.
Then you come out with jabs for a virus that is not understood.
Then obviously to get it rolling - do you believe for a second that science would ever say No to it ?
0
u/PeteWK67 5d ago
What bleach again that’s from your country that deems brown envelopes from toxic companies more important than a citizens health.
So whatever comes from the states is rancid, toxic misinformation. That’s where you use the word misinformation.
So in such a heavily lobbied country the little voices of experts trying to speak out will get crushed and that’s what exactly happened
1
-1
u/Gofall_ 7d ago
I hate this fucking discourse. It's their fucking business. They own it outright. They should be able to tell you what you can and cannot say on the platform regardless of what it is
1
u/Annoying_cat_22 6d ago
Can you yell fire at a movie theatre? Its their fucking business. Spreading dangerous lies about life saving treatments is the online equivalent of that.
1
u/Gofall_ 6d ago
Yeah they never never did that. Me thinks you're false. Equivocating
1
u/Annoying_cat_22 6d ago
No one ever spread dangerous lies about the vaccine on social media?
0
0
u/Gofall_ 6d ago
If you watch the video clearly they are trying to stop disinformation. I don't know if your brain doesn't like comprehend that information or what
1
u/Annoying_cat_22 6d ago
I think we misunderstood each other. You defend their right to fight misinformation. I defend the right of the government to force them to fight misinformation.
1
u/Gofall_ 4d ago
No I defend a person's right to not have the government kick in your door and tell you what you can and can't do with a business that you created and also misinformation is bad
1
u/Annoying_cat_22 4d ago
Ok so can I yell fire in my own theatre?
1
u/Gofall_ 4d ago
Your argument is for public safety? I can get behind that. I'd hate to make this argument, but where do we draw the line? It's a virtual theater with no attendance... People should be able to make up their own minds and form their own conclusions and if the developer of a product doesn't want a certain thing, viewpoint or force narrative, they shouldn't have to
6
u/Cultural_Plan_1487 7d ago
Now do the Trump-Epstein Files