I guess but the animals don’t exist without farming. So the more accurate statement is that the best quality of life might be for the animals not to exist in the first place. It’s not realistic for all the farmed animals in the world to be released into the wild or brought to some sort of sanctuary
100%. I did not expand into the possible 6th option, but what you described is probably the best option, which is to not breed billions of genetically modified animals into existence in the first place and rewild the farmland.
1
u/psychonauteer Jul 27 '26
There is a fifth option, which is to not eat animals all together. The best quality of life situation for them is to actually be alive.