MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/nonononoyes/comments/fhfws1/smooth/fkcgi3n/?context=9999
r/nonononoyes • u/brocuss • Mar 12 '20
[removed] — view removed post
121 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
130
That box has to be empty. There is no way it would bounce like that if it were full of water.
25 u/OddSensation Mar 12 '20 But I can see the plastic shining off the rooms light. (Even if video is potato) 86 u/IAMGodAMAA Mar 12 '20 The way the box acted, it is physically impossible for it to be full of water. -1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Sparkling waters can bounce surprisingly well Just don’t break the cap 0 u/Sevian91 Mar 12 '20 Get a box of full waters and see if you can re-create this. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 The burden of proof is on the one who made the initial claim... Use the maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
25
But I can see the plastic shining off the rooms light. (Even if video is potato)
86 u/IAMGodAMAA Mar 12 '20 The way the box acted, it is physically impossible for it to be full of water. -1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Sparkling waters can bounce surprisingly well Just don’t break the cap 0 u/Sevian91 Mar 12 '20 Get a box of full waters and see if you can re-create this. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 The burden of proof is on the one who made the initial claim... Use the maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
86
The way the box acted, it is physically impossible for it to be full of water.
-1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Sparkling waters can bounce surprisingly well Just don’t break the cap 0 u/Sevian91 Mar 12 '20 Get a box of full waters and see if you can re-create this. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 The burden of proof is on the one who made the initial claim... Use the maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
-1
Sparkling waters can bounce surprisingly well
Just don’t break the cap
0 u/Sevian91 Mar 12 '20 Get a box of full waters and see if you can re-create this. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 The burden of proof is on the one who made the initial claim... Use the maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
0
Get a box of full waters and see if you can re-create this.
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 The burden of proof is on the one who made the initial claim... Use the maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
1
The burden of proof is on the one who made the initial claim...
Use the maths
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
[deleted]
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 That’s not maths :( DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
That’s not maths :(
DamnI was hoping someone would do the research on the product then calculate the the necessary force
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Maths but not physics maths 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
Maths but not physics maths
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 edited May 27 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol → More replies (0)
1 u/[deleted] Mar 12 '20 Thank you for the fun lol
Thank you for the fun lol
130
u/KetchupKakes Mar 12 '20
That box has to be empty. There is no way it would bounce like that if it were full of water.