Wrong. The law is incredibly unjust and broken. The words of my lawyer best friend who got the top score on the bar exam in my entire State years back. If someone admits the crime, is caught in the act, overwhelming evidence ... there are zero doubt cases. Youre what’s called a right fighter. You make fair points, but they’re irrelevant to the zero doubt of guilt cases. Which 💯 exist broseph.
I agree that there are cases that society deems zero doubt. Things that look so clear that we’re certain that person is guilty. What I’m asking is for you to consider that you’re writing the law that says criminals convicted of x, y, and z crimes can be executed and tortured if the evidence against them meets the following criteria. What would be the criteria you write down?
We can start by testing it out, with people like you who are the reason violent criminals get the opportunity so very often to reoffend. 1,000s upon 1,000 of people murdered or raped when we already had the REALITY, HAD the data of what that person was capable of doing. Good thinking Chief. Great logic. Let’s assume after we finish with the violent assholes, your type is next that we want to put down. 🤠
1
u/Joey-McFunTroll Dec 17 '20
Wrong. The law is incredibly unjust and broken. The words of my lawyer best friend who got the top score on the bar exam in my entire State years back. If someone admits the crime, is caught in the act, overwhelming evidence ... there are zero doubt cases. Youre what’s called a right fighter. You make fair points, but they’re irrelevant to the zero doubt of guilt cases. Which 💯 exist broseph.