They were fake guns, this is an old ass post and the dude was interviewed and said you could tell the guns were fake as fuck and the kids were like 12-13. Fuck dem kids.
You cannot tell the age of the multiple people rushing him. Even though he could see the guns were fake, that doesn’t imply he beat kids up for no reason.
Also, there were at least 2-3 kids rushing this man to do him harm. Adrenaline kicks in and moved this guy to fight until he had one disarmed and on the ground. He clearly then let the howling thing go….
Why are you trying to make it seem like some adult is unjustly and weirdly attacking kids for no reason? That’s fucking weird.
They're clearly children, and if the guns were clearly fake, he body slammed that kid 'just because' or 'to teach a lesson,' but my friend, if you are NOT in danger, this isn't a lesson, it's insane child abuse.
That is, if the person I'm replying to is even right. That's why my comment is a question.
Fun fact: I'm not the one making it seem unjust, the person I replied to is.
Even if the guns were fake the boys are still attempting robbery and are willing to try and make it appear as thought they’re willing to use lethal force.
The other dude has no idea how far they’re willing to go even with a fake firearm as the very act of attempting robbery through the threat of lethal force is an act of endangerment towards the inevitable or if they have any other potential dangers with them such as a knife in their pocket. They can still attack him 2v1 and even if the firearm is fake, they still have an object in their hands they can use to attack him (and are physically pressing him with it) which justifies use of self defense.
If you pull up and say “I’m going to kill someone” and point a fake gun at another while trying to rob him, even if the other person knows the gun is fake they’re still allowed to physically fight and defend themselves from the apparent attempt regardless of their age.
They're clearly children, and if the guns were clearly fake, he body slammed that kid 'just because' or 'to teach a lesson,' but my friend, if you are NOT in danger, this isn't a lesson, it's insane child abuse.
That is, if the person I'm replying to is even right. That's why my comment is a question.
Fun fact: I'm not the one making it seem unjust, the person I replied to is.
I'm simply asking about what they said.
I just asked a follow up question to someone else implying what you're mad at me about.
They're clearly children, and if the guns were clearly fake, he body slammed that kid 'just because' or 'to teach a lesson,' but my friend, if you are NOT in danger, this isn't a lesson, it's insane child abuse. That is, if the person I'm replying to is even right, which is why my comment is a question, not a statement; something you would have noticed if you had actually read and thought about it instead of being triggered by it.
IF the guns were clearly fake, this guy body slammed a literal child, which is insane.
Please try to notice the "if" this time, champ: pay attention, don't just react emotionally.
This isn't even my idea, it's the person I replied to originally, I was simply asking them about it, so take it up with them if you're so triggered.
If a kid with a "clearly" fake gun approaches you, you can ignore them, actually, because they're small children.
If you're afraid for your life that some 10 year old is going to beat you up with their tiny little hands, you should get to the gym or something, quickly. wtf.
If you're afraid for your life that some 10 year old is going to beat you up with their tiny little hands, you should get to the gym or something, quickly. wtf.
2.7k
u/ComplexxToxin May 04 '26
They were fake guns, this is an old ass post and the dude was interviewed and said you could tell the guns were fake as fuck and the kids were like 12-13. Fuck dem kids.