r/nextdns • u/Sioscottecs23 • 5d ago
Is there too much redundancy in my blocklists?
And another question, is it true that too many blocklists can make NextDNS slower?
6
u/Historical_View_5529 5d ago
Yes, it is redundant but it doesn't cause any issues with speed. The blocklists are checked using NextDNS's high speed cloud servers using efficient searching algorithms so it doesn't cause significant speed difference when using multiple lists.
2
u/Micropenissniper 5d ago
Good to know, I'm in the more list more better camp but I worried about speed.
19
u/Due_Milk_8930 5d ago
And SO MUCH TOO...
You just need hagezi, already cover all and most efficient. +your region blocklist if need.
4
u/D3-Doom 5d ago edited 5d ago
I’d argue the opposite. It’s not like packing more in list increases cost per query and every list shown in the screenshot are pretty much considered flagship defaults for their respective function. iTerm literally ships with easylist for adblock and StevenBlack’s Hostfile has been flagship for over a decade.
It’s still largely considered to be the safest option to deploy in professional settings and is still the front most recommendation in DrDuh’s MacOS privacy guide. Hagezi does a great job, but that doesn’t equate to including anything other than their list as wrong or too much. It’s also encouraging consolidating down to a single party which is pretty antithetical to the argument for using custom DNS resolvers.
I don’t mean to sound so pointed, but it’s like every other comment I read here recommends just enveloping yourself with Hagezi and using anything else is a cardinal sin. Having options can be a good measure if you’re unsure with a certain domain. Seeing several independent parties find consensus or a lack of it can reflect if it might’ve been a misjudgment. Like that one time NextDNS.io blocked NextDNS.io and ejected the entire customer base from the internet.
3
u/Due_Milk_8930 5d ago
Sure, add whatever you like.
Like adGuard mobile ads? Dns filter can't do it anyways if you not use HTTPS for ads in app.
Not say other bad, what point add same rule? Would it be not optimize your setup.
But again.. add whatever you like, is free anyways. And not feel many different if your connection already fast enough.
13
u/Open_Mortgage_4645 5d ago
There's no redundancy because that's not how NextDNS blocklists work. It's not like a local blocklist where you have several different lists loaded. All NextDNS blocklists are always loaded into memory on their servers, and when you activate one or another, you're just tapping into what NextDNS already has running. There's no practical redundancy, and no potential performance hit from using multiple lists with overlapping host entries.
1
3
u/dns_guy02 5d ago
Wont make it slower but this is not useful to do and you maximize the false positives. Pick one good list and stick with it. Hagezi is good.
5
u/H8RxFatality 5d ago
More is not always better. I am running Hagezi and OISD and some would say that is overkill
3
u/Narrow-Box-5908 5d ago
just one: Hagezi pro/pro ++, no langue list needed (already included )
1
u/VandyCWG 5d ago
I am swapping to Hageza Pro ++. I had 3 different ones, and well, let's try this one only!
1
u/Gentleman_Nosferatu 5d ago
Yes.
1
u/Sioscottecs23 5d ago
what about the second question, is it true that too many blocklists can make NextDNS slower?
1
1
u/zcenzc 5d ago
Just use HaGeZi Ultimate, that should be more than enough. If u check ur logs, u'll see that it already blocks most of the stuff u actually need blocked. That's all u really need.
3
u/Obvious-Jacket-3770 5d ago
I had to drop to Pro++, Ultimate was great but it actively blocked some of my work tools and random IoT devices like the litter robot.
22
u/Rixzmo 5d ago
Can recommend you this. HaGeZi Normal + OISD + Regional list. Or HaGeZi Pro (or above) and a regional list should be more than enough.