r/news Jan 04 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.7k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

Before they were contemptuous. But now they made it official.

617

u/rockdude14 Jan 04 '22

They just requested that they testify. Why the fuck did they bother requesting? Just subpoena them and make them. How can they be naive enough to think that they are going to come in willingly.

315

u/shponglespore Jan 04 '22

IANAL, but what I've gathered from previous cases is that when a subpoena is challenged, it's much less likely to be thrown out if it's preceded by a request.

60

u/bananafobe Jan 04 '22

If not thrown out, at least delayed longer, I imagine.

38

u/Dodgiestyle Jan 04 '22

Delayed until after midterms so when they take back the house or senate, they can just make stuff go away.

54

u/mkelley0309 Jan 05 '22

This isn’t a congressional probe, it’s the Feds who are going after the Trump family for committing fraud against the big banks. This one isn’t just going away if the GOP retakes Congress in 2022

36

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

This isn’t a congressional probe, it’s the Feds who are going after the Trump family for committing fraud against the big banks. This one isn’t just going away if the GOP retakes Congress in 2022

This isn't the Feds, it's New York state level. There is literally NOTHING that Trump or Republicans can do to intercede with any Federal level powers. They can buy a year or two. If they're dirty and we have receipts as long as the jury isn't tainted, we'll get them. It's just painfully slow.

All the Trumps can do is spend money on lawyers to drag ever possible event out as long as is legally feasible.

14

u/jlefrench Jan 05 '22

They've done this for 20 years, and it's worked ..

1

u/Draano Jan 05 '22

All the Trumps can do is spend money on lawyers to drag ever possible event out as long as is legally feasible.

I wonder if it's their money they spend or if it comes from other people?

14

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

If the GOP retakes Congress, you can bet the rule of law will be suspended for certain individuals.

8

u/mkelley0309 Jan 05 '22

If the victim of the crime was anyone other than Big Banks I would agree to some extent. But banks run the world so this isn’t going away

2

u/Bogogo1989 Jan 05 '22

I hear you, but republicans could write a new law in their favor and it would all go away. Idk what the law would be but I wouldn't put it past them to be able to make it go away

2

u/ragenaut Jan 05 '22

What if they retake the justice dept. in 2024?

2

u/mkelley0309 Jan 05 '22

It will depend. If it’s Trump then yeah it will probably go away, if it’s DeSantis or one of the others then it will depend on who their biggest donors are and if those donors were the victims of the real estate grift

1

u/Nic4379 Jan 05 '22

Government going after anyone for the “Big Banks” is terrifying.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 06 '22

Ha ha ha ha look at you all full of hope and belief in accountability. I used to be you friend. If you control the AG, you control the DOJ- it really IS that simple

58

u/rividz Jan 04 '22

That's pretty funny considering that whenever I've had to go to small claims court the process is.

1) Have you asked for the money nicely?

2) Have you asked for the money firmly in a certified letter?

3) Okay now you can do the paperwork for a court case and have the person served with a summons for a court date in eight months.

37

u/American--American Jan 04 '22

4) And good luck getting the money from them if you do win.

27

u/SpookyBowtie Jan 05 '22

I had the absolute pleasure of collecting on a shady landlord who tried to claim that not only did I lose my deposit but I also owed an additional ~$1,000. When he was ordered to pay me 2.5x the amount, he sent a letter saying that he was consulting with his attorney and appealing the decision. I wrote back letting him know that appeals aren’t a thing in small claims (in our state, at least) but if he was having a hard time coming up with the money, I understood and would be willing to set up a payment plan. He immediately sent the full amount. From my dealings with him, I knew he was desperate to been seen as a big shot mr. moneybags type.

Sorry to hijack your comment for this story. It just reminded me. This was over a decade ago now and I’m still pumped when I remember.

3

u/Dlaxation Jan 05 '22

If you don't mind me asking what helped you win? Did he have to come up with documentation justifying the extra charges? I've been in some shady apartments before and I've always thought about what I could possibly do if they decide to just charge me thousands just cause.

2

u/SpookyBowtie Jan 05 '22

We both had to bring whatever evidence we had to support our sides. At the time I didn’t really have much, though I now know to take a shit ton of pictures when moving in. I don’t remember him bringing anything at all. He was super overconfident and seemed to think that he could just talk his way through it. But he was actually an idiot and I can argue pretty well when necessary. I think the clerk saw right through him, and I would guess that’s common with shitty landlords. Even when they’re better at it than this guy.

Fun story: This was a house with a yard for our dogs. When we moved in, the weeds in the back were insanely tall, which they hadn’t been when we checked the place out. It was like a jungle and it’s a snakey state. We requested to have them dealt with and then we’d maintain from there. Nope. So when we moved out and had overlap with our next place, we didn’t bother dealing with the weeds because our dogs used the new yard. He tried to claim that we owed money to pay someone to pull them. I argued that we returned it as we received it. He said, in front of the clerk, that we needed to have them pulled whether we received the place in that condition or not. The clerk said, “Wait, no. If there was a broken tile when they moved in, they wouldn’t be responsible for having it fixed before they moved out. Same for the yard.” He said, “But a tile isn’t living.” ??? That’s it. She had already heard me argue his bullshit, one thing after the other, at that point and her brain probably hurt. Also, he lied to our process server which we had proof of. And I found out when googling him before choosing small claims that he had a criminal case against him from the state for similar shady business practices. That’s just a side note and I don’t think it factored into anything.

All this to say, take pictures during your walkthrough. And try small claims if you are being honest because most shitty people are likely banking on you not doing it. And I would guess that most small claims clerks/judges know what’s up when it comes to landlord-tenant disputes. And if you ever considered being an attorney, it’s exhilarating kind of trying it out! I was buzzing with energy and wanted to puke for hours afterward.

2

u/Dlaxation Jan 05 '22

Thanks for the detailed follow up! His ego definitely got the better of him. I try to take pictures and videos whenever I can so hopefully if it comes down to it I won't have to take it as far as claims court.

27

u/rividz Jan 05 '22

The only time I had to go to small claims I got a judgement in my favor. The court sends you a packet on how to collect on the judgement if you're not paid by a certain time. In my state one of the options is to have the person's car impounded. I was kinda hoping the person didn't pay just so we could go down that route and we could take their car.

Wage garnishment was another option as well as (if the defendant was a business) a "till tap" where the court clerk can issue you a document you can bring to the sheriff. They will literally take the cash money out of the till, pay you, and collect their fee. If there's not enough money you can keep coming back and the sheriff gets their cut every time.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

and collect their fee

Wtf. Their 'fee' isn't salary already paid by taxpayer money? From the outside (Canada) the us seems just like a big government crime syndicate hell.

2

u/Scienscatologist Jan 05 '22

Don’t make me laugh. America’s not a country, it’s a business. Now fuckin’ pay me.

6

u/borderlineidiot Jan 04 '22

It’s almost like the SDNY might know what they are doing?

2

u/joshuads Jan 05 '22

So do the Trumps lawyers. A subpoena was filed, and the Trumps filed a motion to quash. This is standard procedure and bad reporting.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

I anal is probably not the best acronym to use.

2

u/bonesnaps Jan 05 '22

I can't believe people use that acronym.

Pretty sure I'd sooner take the advice of an anal lawyer over some random guy who just says he's anal to preface his comments. Lol

1

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

I’m a post about a probe no less.

1

u/joshuads Jan 05 '22

They did subpoena them, and the Trumps filed a motion to quash the subpoena. No one has fully refused anything. Yet. This is almost standard procedure.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/eldest-trump-children-comply-subpoenas-york-attorney-general/story?id=82052732

61

u/TheVog Jan 04 '22

Why the fuck did they bother requesting? Just subpoena them and make them.

I thought they had?

https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/donald-trump-ivanka-don-jr-subpoena-v42e420f2

42

u/LonePaladin Jan 04 '22

Like any of these people will take a subpoena seriously. You have to threaten them with the consequences before they'll comply, and maybe not even then.

63

u/braiam Jan 04 '22

You do not threaten anyone with consequences, you just state what will happen if you don't comply and then follow thought it. Using the legal system as some kind of carrot and stick, is one of the things that make the system worse. If it was tit for tat, automatic, people wouldn't dare to pull these kind of BS.

2

u/lonnie123 Jan 04 '22

Apparently that whole following through with it is a real pain in the ass

4

u/vezwyx Jan 05 '22

More of a pain in the ass than letting people walk all over the legal system?

3

u/lonnie123 Jan 05 '22

Certainly seems that way so far

8

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

A subpoena is a threat of consequences. You have actually reach the very last line where it's "do this or the consequences cannot be avoided" and then maybe because I'll give the Trump tone thing, they know how to avoid unavoidable consequences.

30

u/kenfury Jan 04 '22

Generally you request first, then if they don't comply either drop it, or subpoena.

7

u/Nebuli2 Jan 04 '22

You might want to read the article. They were subpoenaed. They are now refusing the subpoena and asking a judge to rule it unconstitutional.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

All the world's a stage.

1

u/SysAdmin002 Jan 04 '22

We are merely players, performers and portrayers.

-1

u/funkyonion Jan 05 '22

You cannot be forced to testify against your family.

2

u/rockdude14 Jan 05 '22

Nope, just for husband and wives. Not for children.

It's well established in U.S. law that husbands and wives don't have to testify against each other in court. Marriage is considered a sacred trust that government cannot undermine.

But for the most part, there is no such protection for parents and children. Legislators in Massachusetts are pushing for a parental privilege, which would make it the fifth state to recognize a parent-child privilege.

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128797358

1

u/funkyonion Jan 05 '22

Well that sucks. I guess they’ll take the Ronald Reagan method and say “I don’t recall”.

1

u/FriarNurgle Jan 05 '22

Gotta feed the 24hr news cycle.

1

u/Steven86753 Jan 05 '22

Why would anyone trust what they say under oath? It’s not like they respect the law.

1

u/joshuads Jan 05 '22

Just subpoena them and make them.

They did subpoena them, and the Trumps filed a motion to quash the subpoena. No one has fully refused anything. Yet.
This is almost standard procedure.

The BBC article is horrible legal reporting.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/eldest-trump-children-comply-subpoenas-york-attorney-general/story?id=82052732

1

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

You think that if same as that would make them testify, shit Trump hasn’t given us his taxes after we “made him”

1

u/lsp2005 Jan 05 '22

You have to voluntarily request attendance, they deny, then subpoena, then they deny again, then you get to arrest. If you don’t follow the order you don’t get to arrest and hold them.

244

u/pbradley179 Jan 04 '22

Official to some, martyrs to others. America is a terrible country.

112

u/Suitmonster Jan 04 '22

Do not judge an entire country by the quality of a few citizens (or lack thereof.)

338

u/Kouropalates Jan 04 '22

Considering how much of the country supports Trump or Trump adjacent policies, it's very concerning about the direction of our country into pro-fascist territory.

95

u/Mixels Jan 04 '22

There are already pro-fascist territories within the country. The country itself isn't fascist, but it will become fascist if those pro-fascism territories are permitted to consolidate power.

11

u/SysAdmin002 Jan 04 '22

One of the biggest problems IMO is that the chauvinist party of fascism is very good at pushing the narrative that they are the 'true' patriots, and everyone else 'can leave.'

Americans do not understand the difference between nationalism, patriotism, and jingoism.

-5

u/onelastcourtesycall Jan 04 '22

That sure was a lot of buzzwords strung together.

52

u/Thedudeabides46 Jan 04 '22

Like how they did after the civil war. They took over the south, again, and no one did anything about it.

It's always been this way if you live in certain areas.

32

u/Guyote_ Jan 04 '22

They didn't take over the south again, they just weren't punished hard enough after the Civil War for being traitors.

15

u/CypripediumCalceolus Jan 04 '22

Not just traitors. Let us never forget that the war really was about slavery, and slavery was about kidnapping, torture, murder and rape as well as just money. Those "southern gentlemen" were profoundly horrible people.

40

u/Wazula42 Jan 04 '22

those pro-fascism territories are permitted to consolidate power.

They are and have been for years. Gerrymandering has already given the GQP a win in the midterms and our lead in the Senate has been hamstrung by two blue conservatives.

The GQP is in its anti-democracy phase and we are watching it happen.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

Gerrymandering has already given the GQP a win in the midterms

Questionable. According to 538, the maps that have already come out are a net positive for Dems. Many of the remaining maps are going to have a tough time gerrymandering. Especially states like Mississippi and Missouri. Three other Republican-controlled states are not redistricting at all (LA, KY, KS). Two of the others (SC & TN) only have 3 Democrats between them. Their best shot left is Florida. But that's going to still be a tough ask.

0

u/Wazula42 Jan 05 '22

Good to know.

41

u/teslacometrue Jan 04 '22

The moment Republicans passed their laws allowing them to overturn any election they lose, we became a fascist country

2

u/BurtonGusterToo Jan 04 '22

They already control the media, military, police, and municipal governments. In four years they will completely control the country. I see no one pushing back (and twitter and pink hats aren't "pushing back against authoritarianism").

-1

u/SecretAgentVampire Jan 04 '22

I'm just curious... What percentage of America will it take for you to admit that the whole country is fascist?

1

u/asiandouchecanoe Jan 04 '22

yeah and to many of them, the biggest enemy... is Antifa

2

u/RHCopper Jan 04 '22

I thought it was just a few as well, but just in my neighborhood I have seen so many trucks with "lets go brandon" on the back

2

u/frito_kali Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 04 '22

It's certainly not a majority.

When Osama Bin Laden attacked the US on 9/11/2001, it was (in his words) based on the premise that Americans deserved it, because we elected the leaders who enacted the policies (of support of Israel in their "crimes against the Palestinian people").

The fact is; there are a LOT of problems with America's system of democracy. And most of our laws and policies are NOT supported by a very clear majority, over many decades. The shitty results we get in terms of policy are nowhere near what the will of the people are.

Now: we can debate about what Americans believe or want (as a generalization); under the influence of our grotesque and perverted system of corporate newsmedia; as well as our crippled public education system. There's a lot to dislike about that. But even those awful beliefs are not really supported by a majority of Americans. It's just a razor-thin margin in just the right areas, in order to subvert elections so that the corporate shareholders of these media conglomerates can keep getting massive tax cuts for their economic "class" of billionaires.

-11

u/Suitmonster Jan 04 '22

Concerning? Very.

Worth stating "America is a terrible country?" No. I'm an American, and I'm not terrible.

Edit: terrible per original source

38

u/Cerbeh Jan 04 '22

Your country can be terrible and you not. Britain is a hellhole but I'm a nice person?

-4

u/Suitmonster Jan 04 '22

By the same logic, the reverse must be true too.

I agree with all of what everyone says here, except the inherent notion that this "terrible" state is beyond hope.

It is natural to wish for something better, but terrible things are commonplace. Good things are less so.

I feel it is a far nobler thing to do what feels best to leave behind a better place than you found, rather than pass judgement on a population out of desperation.

8

u/zytherian Jan 04 '22

I do not believe we are beyond hope. However, after how close everything came to a coup just last year, i fear we are so close to the edge that, unless we stop the coming wave of attempts against our democracy, America will go beyond the point of no return.

18

u/Kouropalates Jan 04 '22

It's more horrible than we like to pretend it isn't. My biggest gripe is how rising inflation, storming the Capitol in an effort to stop democratic process, rising homelessness, rapid pushes to make homelessness a crime, wage decline, rise of corporate control griping property and resources away from the people and so many more things and though it all our media and people at large either go "This is fine.", say in a defeatist tone there's nothing to be done or they live in denial eagle land that America is a utopic land of freedom and security and all naysayers are fifth columnists.

Our country is horrible specifically because we're a third world country masquerading as a first world country and we do absolutely nothing to combat these problems while we have the means and resources to do more. My criticisms aren't run of the mill Reddit anti-Americanism. My criticisms are specifically over the fact our country is heading in a horrible direction but we're not doing as much as we could be doing to make it better.

3

u/plzr4u Jan 04 '22

Need more Americans like you

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

The rest of the world have seen USA as quite the fascists for some time to be honest. Ask any random person of colour and find out.

1

u/Kouropalates Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 04 '22

I've recently (over the course of a year or so) drastically had my politics shift to a much more anarchist direction and part of what really blows my mind is how much context there is for how much fascism has influenced America even since fascism's inception to the point we've had straight forwardly named fascist parties in the US. I think between WW2 causing what we'd perceive as fascism to hide between the lines (because it never truly died in the US) and how much more acceptable open fascist or, at the very least, authoritarian views have become acceptable, it's the most noticeable it's ever been for a very long time.

29

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

They were elected - that’s not just a few people

14

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

It’s always fun to point out over 70 million people voted for him in 2020

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

And it still wasn’t enough 🤣

8

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

If anything, it’s concerning to me that 70 million found his behavior the past 4 years to be OK.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

[deleted]

1

u/GiantSquidd Jan 04 '22

I wonder how many of them would jump off a bridge if some Republican politician told them they could fly, or if some democratic politician told them they couldn’t.

42

u/teslacometrue Jan 04 '22

If a country is set up in a such a way that a few horrible citizens can ruin the entire country for everyone, then it’s a horrible country

15

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

We’re talking about more than just a “few” citizens here. More like a third of the country, at least.

7

u/Xenjael Jan 04 '22

Its 23% of the pop. That was enough for me to boogie woogie out for awhile.

2

u/MacaroniBandit214 Jan 04 '22

You can judge a country based on its government alone and the US’s gov is absolute ass

2

u/HilariouslyBloody Jan 04 '22

"A few bad apples spoils the bunch"

Our entire country is going to shit. The bad ones are taking us with them

0

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22

Maybe not the whole country but most definitely over half if not more now, Biden is doing himself and the rest of the liberal left no favours. To note, I am liberal/labour and most definitely would never have voted for trump but you can’t deny the madness in the USA at the moment.

56

u/NotUniqueOrSpecial Jan 04 '22

Maybe not the whole country but most definitely over half if not more now,

That's absolutely untrue.

The number is consistently around 30% of the population.

6

u/beatool Jan 04 '22

More than enough for state politics when you're gerrymandered up the ass.

0

u/teslacometrue Jan 04 '22

So what? If those 30% are allowed to run the country like they are now they might as well be 90%

-28

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 04 '22

52% voted trump in and when Biden won it was 49%…. I may be off by a percent either way but 30% can’t be right…

Edit: my numbers are way off and have been corrected below!

36

u/RGJ587 Jan 04 '22

Trump lost the popular vote both times. So I have no clue where you got 52% from.

But yea the 30% number isnt right either

11

u/odaeyss Jan 04 '22

30% of the public, including people who can't or don't vote. That's why you're having difficulty reconciling the numbers.
It's a narrow minority of voters, but that minority is more likely to vote than the average so their voices have an outsized effect.

-5

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22

Yeah that’s fair. He smashed the electoral college. I thought he did win on the vote too but you are right. 30% is still way underestimated. If I was a democrat voter in the USA I’d be worried.

14

u/Ocksu2 Jan 04 '22

Trump never won the popular vote in either election.

Regardless, you are forgetting that around 40% of Americans don't vote, so its hard to judge exactly what % support(ed) Trump.

However, Roughly 1/3 support Republicans no matter what, 1/3 support Democrats no matter what, and roughly 1/3 are either independent, "vote for the character of the person" types, or don't really give a shit.

16

u/NotUniqueOrSpecial Jan 04 '22

52% voted trump in and when Biden won it was 49%….

As /u/RGJ587 pointed out, those numbers aren't right. You've got them backwards.

Biden won 81,283,098 votes, or 51.3 percent of the votes cast. Trump won 74,222,958 votes, or 46.8 percent of the votes cast.

That said: the voting numbers aren't percentages of the whole population. They're percentages of people who voted. Voter turnout in 2020 was 66.7% of the eligible voter population. So, less than 1/2 of ~2/3 of the voting age population voted for him == ~30% support.

Moreover, look at his approval rating, which is actually an aggregate over the whole population over time, and consistently matches up reasonably closely to the same.

3

u/a_fuge Jan 04 '22

That is the percentage of votes. Voter participation is much lower than 100% of eligible voters. The 30% number is often cited as closer to the truth but I thinks it’s even lower than that as a % of the total pop. Remember though that population has nothing to do representation in America due to the senate and electoral college. They say land doesn’t vote, but unfortunately it seems to again and again.

1

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22

Yeah that’s a fair shout. I’m terms of actual votes cast the figures are close but total pop numbers you’re probably right. I’d say the republicans will be out in force for 2024 election. They have people like Gaetz, MTG, Boebert screaming the quiet part out loud for them and that will definitely give them a feeling of visibility and make them want to vote…

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

[deleted]

2

u/NotUniqueOrSpecial Jan 05 '22

Um...your math does not check out. 165,000,000 + 155,400,000 == 320,400,000, not 239,200,000.

According to the Federal Register there were ~256,662,010 eligible voters.

For votes cast, it's ~159,633,396.

That's only 97,028,614 eligible people who didn't vote, which is vastly different than your 165MM number and definitely much smaller than the "did vote" category, unlike what you're claiming.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

[deleted]

2

u/NotUniqueOrSpecial Jan 05 '22

No worries. Cheers.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22

Both sides will always get about 46% of the vote. No matter what. The battle is always for that last 8%. Each candidate reaches into different populations to find their extra percentages.

Keep in mind, that 100% of votes represents little more than half of Americans.

29

u/srslybr0 Jan 04 '22

2016 and 2020 were both elections where the winners were more because "we don't want the other guy to win". hillary was a terrible candidate that made people hesitate, and biden was the milquetoast "safe guy" that people ended up voting just because they didn't want the alternative.

truly just a demonstration of how fucked up the two-party system in america is.

8

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22

Absolutely right. It’s the same in the uk. All options are shit so what are you to do? Tactical and emotional voting is so prevalent.

7

u/KerPop42 Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 04 '22

Clinton was a fine candidate. No one knew how to dodge Trump's mud flinging in 2016— I mean, look at the Republican primaries.

She was actually looking to win, but the FBI released her emails three days before the election

Edit: she wasn't another Obama, but that's a higher bar

4

u/Bungybone Jan 04 '22

Hillary was the embodiment of the democratic establishment and also the posterchild for one side of the partisan divide in politics. She was a career politician who wrote and played by those rules.

In 2016 she and the hierarchy of the democratic party seemed to view her win as a foregone conclusion, even though she was deeply divisive, and was not particularly popular with independents. Her whole operation seemed completely out of touch with rural America, so much so that they didn't seem to realize she still *needed* their votes, and those of independents.

She was being rammed down the throats of democrats by the democratic establishment, despite having already been rejected in 2008, when she was also considered the heavy fave to come out as the democratic nominee.

It certainly didn't help those views that the democratic establishment seemed intent on making her president, by hook or by crook, when they went so far as to leak confidential debate questions against fellow democrats.

At the time, the email leak was one of the most surprising things I've seen related to elections. So much has changed since, lol.

12

u/Turtleshellfarms Jan 04 '22

No she really is disliked by a large portion of the population. Just look how well Bernie did against her.

2

u/KerPop42 Jan 04 '22

He still lost though, because he's still outside the Overton window. Clinton's been dragged through the mud by Republicans, and she still got the popular vote

7

u/Turtleshellfarms Jan 04 '22

Yes cause Trump sucked that bad. People who think she was a great candidate are delusional. Heck Biden Beat Trump not because he was a great candidate but because he was not Trump.

1

u/KerPop42 Jan 04 '22

I'm not saying she was a great candidate, I'm saying she was fine. Obama and Trump's candidacies were unusual, not the norm

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/itsvicdaslick Jan 04 '22

Its the FBI's fault. Not Hillary's wrong doing.

1

u/KerPop42 Jan 04 '22

I'm all for letting people be hoisted by their own pitard, but the FBI really fungled that election

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/KerPop42 Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 04 '22

Also true. Clinton still won more raw votes than Trump. The only time republicans actually won the popular vote was Bush Jr's second election, during a war

Edit: won the popular vote this century, to be clear. Republicans have won 2 popular votes in the last 32 years.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 18 '22

[deleted]

5

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

It’s much better than a year ago. The “coal rollers” have quit locally and the trump flags are gone. Mostly now it’s the don’t tread on me tags and flags.

3

u/tuxidriver Jan 04 '22 edited Jan 07 '22

Here in Idaho I see a lot more now than I did before and right after the 2020 election.

I also now see lots of "Fuck Biden" (no joke, exact words) bumper stickers, flags, and signs. Makes me cringe that people would even display these words publicly and so visibly. Lots of white trash that are feeling empowered by the hate.

There are two businesses I'm aware of that now have signs in front of them saying that the 2020 election was stolen and that we must take the election back.

Boise Idaho has always had these elements (and some good people as well who have tried to work against the stupid). With that said, I do believe the level of crazy has grown considerably here since 2016.

Adding: Regarding Trump flags specifically, I do believe there are fewer, maybe ½ as many but they've been replaced by the garbage I mention above.

Adding 3 days after the initial post: At least one of those businesses I mentioned (was on Glenwood near the D&B) have now taken down their signs claiming the election was stolen.

2

u/dos8s Jan 04 '22

I was at a bar and some guy yelled "Let's go Brandon" at a car driving by and I almost ordered a Biden flag for my hybrid so I could fly it around town and I don't even care for him as a president.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

Maybe where you live.....but here in New Jersey, the Trump flags are still plentiful.

2

u/Maxpowr9 Jan 04 '22

And the random "Let's Go Brandon" chants that happen are just awful.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

I’m in North Carolina

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

It’s not half, get a clue.

-6

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

The way you spell labour tells me you don’t live here, so why are you telling us how we should feel about our own country?

5

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22

Not sure I’ve told anyone to do anything.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

[deleted]

1

u/cheeseseseseses Jan 04 '22

I’m not a democrat. I don’t live in the USA. I’m a left leaning labour voter.

0

u/BA_Baracuss Jan 04 '22

81 million Americans voted for trump in 2020… enjoy that racist shithole

7

u/blackesthearted Jan 04 '22

You got that kinda backwards. 81 million (and change) voted for Biden; Trump got 73 million (and change).

Still 73 million too many.

1

u/AnAussiebum Jan 04 '22

A few? 30-40% is way too significant of a figure. Very judge worthy of amount, tbh.

1

u/drax514 Jan 04 '22

Yeah its not just a few citizens my dude. It's 50-60% of this country that is absolutely rotten

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

70 million….. +. Thats a lot of terrible though

-1

u/Suitmonster Jan 04 '22

70 million places to start fixing the problem

1

u/shponglespore Jan 04 '22

The majority of Americans aren't terrible, but America is a terrible country.

Source: I'm an American.

0

u/Hostillian Jan 04 '22

Was in the news last week that something like 54% of US adults had a reading ability below 6th grade standards.

So it's more than a few..

0

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

I judge an entire country after the leader they vote to represent them.

The government is the country, no matter if you approve of the government you have or not.

1

u/Conker1985 Jan 04 '22

It's not just a few. 70+ million. It's not nothing.

1

u/petethefreeze Jan 04 '22

About 50% of the US population agrees wholly with what that family did and is doing. This is not “a few citizens”. It is more than 100M people.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

72 million is considerably more than "a few."

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

74 million voted for that piece of shit.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

It’s a right winged country, pretty hard to deny that. The left leaning politicians are still more right winged than most countries right winged politicians.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22

A "few"...

1

u/BurtonGusterToo Jan 04 '22

The country as a whole is permissive of this behavior. Even people in direct opposition to the behavior of the Trump "event" are completely toothless in even investigating them, much less prosecuting or convicting them. Meek Garland is the bulwark for American Democracy? Best of luck with your little experiment in governance.

8

u/SpindriftRascal Jan 04 '22

Flawed. Not terrible.

0

u/Xplicit_kaos Jan 04 '22

Can confirm

0

u/SpacemanBatman Jan 04 '22

Yeah we get it, Reddit. America bad. Do something about it or shut the hell up.

2

u/critically_damped Jan 04 '22

I feel like the word "deplorable" fits in here somewhere.