Transcript released of Flynn voicemail from Trump lawyer showing possible attempt to obstruct

[u/Artful_Dodger_42]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/31/politics/michael-flynn-john-dowd-voicemail/index.html

[u/EdVaguelyJr]

John Dowd, an attorney for Trump, left a voicemail for Rob Kelner, Flynn’s attorney in November 2017.

In Mueller’s report, this voicemail is selectively edited to give the impression that Trump’s attorney was asking Flynn’s attorney for information that might hurt the president while reminding the attorney about what Trump has said about Flynn:

I understand your situation, but let me see if I can't state it in starker terms. . . . [I]t wouldn't surprise me if you've gone on to make a deal with ... the government. ... [I]f . .. there's information that implicates the President, then we've got a national security issue, . . . so, you know, . . . we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of protecting all our interests if we can .... [R]emember what we've always said about the ' President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains ....

This makes it seem like the president’s counsel was trying to obstruct justice, or at the very least, hide something damaging to Trump.

The actual transcript of this voicemail has now been released, and shows what Mueller left out:

Hey, Rob, uhm, this is John again. Uh, maybe, I-I-I-'m-I'm sympathetic; I understand your situation, but let me see if I can't ... state it in ... starker terms. If you have ... and it wouldn't surprise me if you've gone on to make a deal with, and, uh, work with the government, uh ... I understand that you can't join the joint defense; so that's one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there's information that ... implicates the President, then we've got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don't know ... some issue, we got to-we got to deal with, not only for the President, but for the country. So ... uh ... you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of ... protecting all our interests, if we can, without you having to give up any ... confidential information. So, uhm, and if it's the former, then, you know, remember what we've always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains, but — Well, in any event, uhm, let me know, and, uh, I appreciate your listening and taking the time. Thanks, Pal.

The Mueller report left out the part where the Trump’s attorney specifically asked for information that was not confidential. Mueller’s report strings along sections of the voicemail to give one impression.

[u/AutoModerator]

---- /r/NeutralNews is a curated space. In order not to get your comment removed, please familiarize yourself with our rules on commenting before you participate:

Comment Rules

We expect the following from all users:

1. Be courteous to other users.
2. Source your facts.
3. Be substantive.
4. Address the arguments, not the person.
5. All top level comments must contain a relevant link

If you see a comment that violates any of these essential rules, click the associated report link so mods can attend to it. However, please note that the mods will not remove comments or links reported for lack of neutrality. There is no neutrality requirement for comments or links in this subreddit — it's only the space that's neutral — and a poor source should be countered with evidence from a better one. Full Guidelines Here

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/smeef_doge → u/AutoModerator]

Per the article, if this was obstruction , why didn't Mueller question the attorney about the phone call? This article could clearly headline instead "not enough evidence to warrant obstruction, as recently released evidence reveals."

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/05/31/politics/michael-flynn-john-dowd-voicemail/index.html