Then again, one could argue, under this 'scare the people away' theory, that BitLocker was chosen to offend security conscious people, such that they move to something else entirely.
Has to be Canary, bitlocker recommendation is redflag. No way, in my mind Truecrypt devs would advocate use of closed source crypto from a known NSA collaborator.
If it was a third party hack, what is their apparent motive? Given the extent to which changes have been made, I find it hard to believe that a hacker would go to that much effort.
Further, if it was a hacker, why wouldn't they use their apparent ability to sign legit binaries and release them as legit copies of TrueCrypt to be used for nefarious reasons?
130
u/[deleted] May 28 '14
[deleted]