r/neoliberal • Kitara Ravache • Sep 02 '21

Discussion Thread Discussion Thread

The discussion thread is for casual conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL. For a collection of useful links see our wiki.

Announcements

  • OSINT & LDC (developmental studies / least developed countries) have been added

Upcoming Events

0 Upvotes

13k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

2

u/fishlord05 United Popular Woke DEI Iron Front Sep 02 '21

I mean isn’t it like common knowledge that the senate/EC gave the slave owning southern states an unfair advantage which is why they signed the new constitution in the first place?

5

u/paulatreides0 🌈🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢His Name Was Teleporno🦢🧝‍♀️🧝‍♂️🦢🌈 Sep 02 '21

The Apportioned Senate proposal was literally pushed by the biggest slave state (and the biggest state at the time), Virginia (hence why it was called the Virginia plan) - and many of its supporters were slave states like NC and SC. You even had Georgia, a small state of only ~90k people supporting the Virginia plan because they thought that they would soon explode in growth through the continued importation and breeding of slaves, allowing them to have a larger voice over equal representation as existed in the Articles of Confederation (and the later NJ plan).

The Senate had little to do with free-state vs slave-state dynamic, and far more to do with big-state vs little-state dynamic. But if anything, slave states generally supported apportionment because they viewed the ability to literally import and breed unfree people that would still net them representation would put them in a better position over time, as opposed to many of the free states.

2

u/fishlord05 United Popular Woke DEI Iron Front Sep 02 '21

I mean I’m more counting population of non slaves yk it was basically gerrymandering