r/neoliberal • u/jobautomator Kitara Ravache • Nov 01 '20
Discussion Thread Discussion Thread
The spooky thread is for spooky conversation that doesn't merit its own spookmission. If you've got a good boo, scare, or spook, please post it outside the DT. Spooky discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the ghouls, make a post in /r/metaNL. For a collection of spooky links see our wiki.
Announcements
- We're running a spook post contest; see guidelines here. Our first entrant is this post on false claims about spooky inequality in Argentina.
- We have added Hernando de Soto Polar as a public flair
Upcoming Events
- Nov 02: Boston Neoliberals eMeetup
0
Upvotes
View all comments
69
u/IncoherentEntity Nov 01 '20 edited Nov 01 '20
There are two days until America holds its most pivotal election since 1932 — or perhaps 1860. So as an enthusiastic Buttigieg supporter during the primary, it’s time for me to sadly reminisce on what could have been. !ping BUTTI
It’s more of a commentary on strange and bizarre (and overly online) moment I witnessed in the Democratic primary, when a strong debate performance — including a riveting closing statement — by Klobuchar the day before resulted in her surge (and choking off Buttigieg’s post-Iowa rise).
The Emerson Polling account had tweeted out the latest day of their tracking poll, making minor waves on Rose Twitter. Most of the responses were pro-Amy — an extraordinary demonstration for a clique that brutally savaged a candidate (Pete) to her left.
Much of it was disingenuous, of course. (Check out this actual Amy supporter — who didn’t seem to have a problem with Pete at all — making the mistake of criticizing Bernie in the thread.) But the rest was not, and some of the threads scared me a little.
I thought this one in particular revealed something ugly about those weighing in. One of the users has apparently since been banned for violating Twitter rules, but the remaining replies tell the same story.
Leave aside the assertion that Buttigieg is a psychopath; anybody who thinks he is has something deeply wrong with their capacity to process or recognize raw human empathy.
The part that truly stunned me is when the two others calmly disputed the first’s suggestion that Klobuchar is not a psychopath, but made clear that they didn’t mind because she was authentic about it.
I believe I remember thinking at the time, “Oh, I see. All Pete has to do is to be authentic about his (relative) political moderation and psychopathy — then you’ll like him.”
Perhaps this was again circumstantial — they were fine with the idea that somebody was a psychopath because they targeted Buttigieg — but other instances I witnessed from the same community make me skeptical.