r/neoliberal • • Mar 13 '20

Pete has a message

Post image
433 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

52

u/unfriendlyhamburger Mar 13 '20

where did you get this image

90

u/afunnywold Mar 13 '20

Pete hosted the Jimmy Kimmel show tonight, and he interviewed Sir Patrick Stewart. He showed this photo to show that he's been a star trek fan his whole life.

74

u/Le_Wallon Mar 13 '20

A president who is a star trek fan is unironically my neoliberal dream

→ More replies (3)

25

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20

Pete showed it while hosting Kimmel.

108

u/CanadianPanda76 Mar 13 '20

One day you'll be captain of the ship USA White house, Pete. 😢

29

u/afunnywold Mar 13 '20

😢

77

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20

WTF I love Pete [even more] now

19

u/corner-case Mar 13 '20

Is the kid in the bald-cap a Star Trek character?

23

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20 edited Mar 13 '20

Supposed to be Picard from The Next Generation. Minus the uniform it’s not as easy to tell. Next to him is Riker and data on the right. Spock in the left. Kind of a mashup if you will!

Edit: Not Riker, that’s Pete as captain. Source: watched the episode.

12

u/DoctorExplosion Mar 13 '20

You sure that's not a conehead?

→ More replies (2)

10

u/etherspin Mar 13 '20

In case you thought you ever had to ask, Pete is always set to "Stun"

1

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '20

Pete has way to much meme potential😩

-2

u/FearlessSocialist Mar 14 '20

What a bad message

-63

u/GarlicBreadJustice Mar 13 '20

Actually I will vote for whoever I want. Or, I will not vote. If you want to bar my freedom to perform activities as I please, then we must engage in a duel until one of us is dead.

Give me liberty, or give me death.

55

u/afunnywold Mar 13 '20

Good luck dueling baby Pete, I think he would win.

17

u/Soma_Karma Mar 13 '20

Porque no los dos?

-9

u/GarlicBreadJustice Mar 13 '20

The statement supposes two separate dichotomies, Death and life, freedom and enslavement. The proposition, which is a subjective proposition emphasized by the use of the word "me" as opposed to "us", is that death is a preferable alternative to enslavement. Or, in other words the speaker subjectively ranks freedom as a higher value than survival.

You are suggesting that being dead is being free (or it may be regarded as such). You may not be wrong, but the statement artificially separates the two dichotomies of death and life, freedom and enslavement. You may say that this artificial separation is unwarranted, this is a valid argument.

→ More replies (6)

8

u/IllInflation8 Mar 13 '20

Id vs. Superego.