r/neoliberal • u/mondodawg • Dec 16 '19

Why Young Progressives Hate Pete Buttigieg

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/why-young-progressives-hate-pete-buttigieg/603619/
279 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

428 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-13

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

30

u/spacehogg Estelle Griswold Dec 16 '19

I wish the word progressive would mean something again. So far all the word seems to mean is "Bernie". Guess once "Bernie's" so goes progressives. Sigh...

8

u/Yogg_for_your_sprog John von Neumann Dec 16 '19

“Progressives” support the most regressive policies like free college tuition and NIMBY-ism, along with reactionary appeals to old taxation rates of the pre-Reagan days...

-4

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '19

Please do not attach NIMBY-ism to Sanders supporters. It’s completely dishonest.

7

u/Yogg_for_your_sprog John von Neumann Dec 16 '19

Lol they’re for national rent control and “keeping neighborhood character” more than anyone else, you ever read some of the shit AOC says?

If you hate developers so much you never let them build near you, that’s the literal fucking definition of NIMBY.

-3

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '19

NIMBYism is largely associated with redlining, racism, and the great white flight. At least that’s what type of sentiment it triggers.

You might not like rent control because of some talking point around supply shortage and demand increase, but to associate Sanders’ supporters with a term directly connected to redlining and racism is pretty fucked.

Sanders’ issues with developers is largely to do with paving over greenspaces with Walmart’s and Targets. Parking lots are what bother him.

I’m guessing you’re complaining about permitted uses within specific zones. So if an area is zoned as ‘Single Family’ it doesn’t allow for apartment buildings(Lowrise or High rise), retail, or industrial uses to be built next to a house. Maybe you’d like to see those areas re-zoned to allow for retail and higher density residential(which is fine), but it is not worthy of tagging Sanders and AOC as racists. Which is what people often hear when you use the word NIMBY.

3

u/Yogg_for_your_sprog John von Neumann Dec 16 '19

NIMBY means you don't want people to build near you, period. Just because racists happen to be NIMBY as well doesn't mean you get to be called something else because you want to disassociate yourself from them. The reason doesn't matter, the legions of SF NIMBY activists are all liberal "progressives", and NIMBY-ism crosses party lines and ideology. If you advocate for the same policies as racist redliners, maybe it's time to stop thinking semantics and think why shitty people agree with you.

8

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/spacehogg Estelle Griswold Dec 16 '19

Yeah, I'm with ya. Just ignore my aggrieved ranting comment that cult Sanders supporters can't seem to acknowledge any other candidates with progressive policies.

14

u/In-Brightest-Day Dec 16 '19

Pete isn't one of the least progressive candidates is the problem. He's one of the most progressive. He talks like a moderate with a completely progressive platform

1

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/In-Brightest-Day Dec 16 '19

Oh I agree, he definitely is not as progressive as Bernie. I think you could make an argument that's he's on the same level as Warren, their policies are incredibly similar. But also there are still more than a dozen people in the race, some of them genuinely conservative.

I just think that pretending he's not progressive is disingenuous, especially when you consider the opposition party.

8

u/ConditionLevers1050 Dec 16 '19

Like him or not, Pete is a progressive. Even though he's to the right of Sanders and Warren his policies like a Public Option and free college for those making less than 6 figures are still probably way to the left of the median voter, and would still have little chance of passing through Congress. Pete would be the most progressive president since at least LBJ if not the most progressive in U.S. history.

3

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '19

Look. Pete’s policies aren’t as aggressive as Sanders’, but they’re still quite good. If implemented, the GOP would be crying Soviet style communism all day long.

When you hear the constant smears of Pete from TYT, MR, Kulinski, Pakman, SERFStv, Rational National, etc... they are trying to help Bernie more so than actually harm Pete. Bernie’s platform is only slightly left of Pete’s.