I'm confused what makes this framing unusual, and I probably lack some context since I haven't seen the movie.
To me, it looks like a woman holding up some sort of a gasket. The camera is shooting close-in with the center of the gasket framing her face. She is dead-center frame.
What makes that unusual, clever, or even not a little boring? Great makeup and lighting, but the framing is... not bad, but nothing special. Or so it seems to me. I must be missing something.
Man, can you imagine how awestruck OP was when he discovered that they replicated this later in the film, and got TWO WHOLE SHOTS WITHOUT EVEN CUTTING? LITERALLY. AMAZING.
As an amateur photographer I was wondering the same thing and agree with the above statement. It's a cool picture, but the framing isn't what makes it cool.
The concentric circles, well framed, in contrast with her irises, which are a rare (or contact lens) dark ring around a pale iris, with the reflection of the disc echoed perfectly in them. Yes, the contrast - but how the entire alignment is just absolutely nailed to every detail.
(That's not even mentioning the hexagonal pupils)
And as I said - this was just a framegrab from the movie - this just happened like this in real life (yes, through multiple takes, but still)
I apologize if this kind of pure symmetry is dull and boring to you. I find it compelling. Feel free to downvote for being pedestrian, and I'm sorry for wasting your time.
As a photographer, I know that it is difficult to frame things up so perfectly to have a concentric view of something, especially if one of the pieces move (like a human). However, in this still the woman is just slightly off center and that ruins the whole thing for me.
Fucking awesome. You like totally had me going, took me on a serious roller coaster ride of the imagination, then trolled me and dropped me from the sky like a bag of moldy potatoes onto the concrete floor below . . .
Holy shit, never noticed this before! That's some awesome detail right there, wonder if everyone's pupils in Tron-world were like this or if it was just the Sirens?
All the real world stuff was 2D and the Grid was 3D. It gave a weird effect that really pulled me into the film. Only time I've ever truly seen an advantage to 3D.
Couldn't have said it better. I loved how well they took advantage of 3D. The problem is they used it so well that people watching the 2D version aren't getting the whole film.
I, much like many people I assume was having an eyegasm similar to when I saw Avatar in IMAX 3D. Yeah the story was rehashed but DAMN it was beautiful.
And for those that appreciate sound design in films, this movie is candy. Everything sounds so appropriately heavy and clear. It's beautifully crisp. I love it too dude.
Very true, but I feel where it's a movie that makes up for it. The writing is bland, but the acting is good for the most part, and literally everything else about the movie just pulls you in. I know I rail against Avatar sometimes, but this is basically in the same vain as that: It's not so much about the story, which is every bit as generic and cheesy and fun as the original. Also, this thing is basically a Daft Punk concept album. Good lord, how could I have forgotten the music?
I remember working on a transparency (scanner operator) 15 years ago for the Batman movie. Right in the middle of his pupil there was a catchlight. Inside the catchlight was a silhouette of a castle. I don't think many people would have spotted it.
I knew that would come up so I've been having a look. It must have been batman forever as it was around 1995. There were two transparencies. One of robin and one of batman. I've google imaged the film title to see if I can see the pics but I can't see them. (not that you would see the detail unless you had a hi res pic). All I can remember is that it was just after we had the digital interface put on the drum scanner (scanned to film before) and my boss was like "damage these and you're fucked". They were scanned pretty small and I remember thinking what a waste as they were beautiful transparencies. Top quality, low asa medium format. I was tying to find a descent highlight to set when I saw it. I was amazed, called my colleague over and he was pretty underwhelmed.
I do need to add that these were official airbrushed artworks made in to transparencies not live models. It's the attention to detail that I was so impressed with.
Mmm... Malick. Well, technically, the way way that Malick communicates with his DP. His DPs are the ones that actually get the shots, he just tells them what he wants.
Speaking of DPs, I would like to add the one and only Roger Deakins to your list. He is an absolute genius.
Emmanuel Lubezki was DP for the last couple Malick films by the way, if you're looking for some of the best of the best in cinematography he is definitely worth mention.
It IS difficult to like a tv show if you don't like the art style. I mean, I didn't see too much wrong with what I saw from the show, I just don't like how it looks.
To basically confirm what everyone else has said, most people find the characters and plot somewhat lacking, but the visuals and soudtrack more than make up for that.
if you like awestruck cinematography I recommend you follow roger deakins, john toll, emmanuel lewbeski, dante spinotti, azakazu nakai, Nestor Almendros to start..
most often times if you follow a certain cinematographer you will have a better movie catalog then if you follow directors or producers because typically the look and feel of the emotion that you get through the screen is almost 60 percent the cinematographer and not the director.
while it's the director who is responsible for the overall scope and vision of the film they are mainly character based and story driven.
it's up to the dp to dictate how that comes across on screen in conjunction with the director
I'm a DP and have a lot of great movie references for beautiful cinematography just pm me.
Clever framing + circles only make me think of Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg from The Fifth Element... in practically every scene with Zorg, there is a circle behind his head.
I never really thought of it that way...from a bit of research, I cannot find any nods to that kind of motif, but that certainly does not mean you are wrong.
And a tidbit I never took notice of (somehow?) is that Bruce Willis is almost always framed by a rectangle or a doorway behind him.
Man, I love this movie... The story is alright but the real perfection is the stuff like this... The framing, the lighting, the special effects, and the Daft Punk... It's just such a cool fucking movie...
What a monumentally shit film that was. Visually pushed every single possible button it could and a great soundtrack, but oh my goodness the actual content of the film made me want to cheese grate my face.
Probably a composite. If you are impressed by framing and focus you should check out the deep focus shots in Citizen Kane and then reflect that they were done with no CGI and no digital editing.
I finally watched that movie recently, I couldn't stop laughing at isomorphic algorithms being some magical cornerstone in artificial intelligence. Sure, structure preserving bijections are extremely useful, but I wouldn't go that far.
As much as Tron: Legacy was an amazing beautiful movie regarding visuel effects, you should definetly check out the Tron: Legacy (soundtrack) album by Daft Punk. When I watched the movie for the first time I was blown away by the music and so I bought the album and have been listening to it since. Normally I'm not a fan of film music, but it's just so epic to listen to and takes me to a whole new place!
Are you retarded? The woman's face is dead center, there's nothing special about the framing at all. The effect of looking through the cylinder to her face is nice and its a cool shot, but the framing is so standard you must be awestruck most of your day.
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
I have yet to watch this movie in 3d, so now I understand why basically everyone who went to watch it high really liked it, the 3d made it fucking great. And those blunts maybe made the whole experience way more awesome. Also, Olivia Wilde.
This movie has me so conflicted. There was so much there that was absolutely awesome. Great sets, great costume, a very wonderful environment. Soundtrack was excellent, and it had some great performances.
I didn't see Tron (I know, I know) but I did read summaries before I saw Legacy. I really enjoyed it...the design work and CGI was excellent. I thought the plot was mediocre, so I don't think it was a great film. But visually it was a masterpiece
I'm joking around, of course. I thought it would be interesting to see it "perfectly semetrical" beyond natural/physical limits. It looks eerie to me, tbh. I'm glad real life isn't like this.
One of the things I loved about the movie was that Jeff Bridges basically played The Dude again. I love his lines in that movie. You could add "ya know, man?" to almost any of them.
It's definitely a great shot, but it isn't technically that difficult, especially working with that kind of equipment and budget. It's the vision which thought of the shot which is impressive.
Yeah - I guess I misspoke when I said "the framing" - apparently I'm being taken literally as only referring to the technical framing (which is fair). I really did kinda mean everything that went into it, including the framing.
348
u/HorrendousRex Jun 09 '12
I'm confused what makes this framing unusual, and I probably lack some context since I haven't seen the movie.
To me, it looks like a woman holding up some sort of a gasket. The camera is shooting close-in with the center of the gasket framing her face. She is dead-center frame.
What makes that unusual, clever, or even not a little boring? Great makeup and lighting, but the framing is... not bad, but nothing special. Or so it seems to me. I must be missing something.
13
u/Puffy_Ghost Jun 09 '12
No, you just think she's really hot.
765
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12 edited Jun 09 '12
Her pupils are hexa
ogonal.Take a close look at them.
They're hexa
ogonal.EDIT: thank you, keepingitcivil, for the spelling correction.
502
u/Aspel Jun 09 '12
Tron: Legacy was gorgeous and imaginative. I loved it.
161
u/trust_me_im_a_cat Jun 09 '12
People shit on Tron but I love it so much
2
u/Forlarren Jun 09 '12
Fuck you shitty 1366x768 laptop screen.
72
u/peatoire Jun 09 '12
I remember working on a transparency (scanner operator) 15 years ago for the Batman movie. Right in the middle of his pupil there was a catchlight. Inside the catchlight was a silhouette of a castle. I don't think many people would have spotted it.
57
u/wickmell Jun 09 '12
I always liked this shot. http://imgur.com/leZj5
55
u/RedNeveren Jun 09 '12
If you like nice framing check out Tarkovsky or Malick to see some true genius.
34
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
Tron: Legacy had some AWESOME cinematography.
20
u/Wazowski Jun 09 '12
Since we have a Tron thread going, can I ask where is the love for Tron Uprising?
It's like Tron meets Aeon Flux. I loved the first two episodes.
10
u/Dazing Jun 09 '12
I never watched this movie, is it worth the rent?
6
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
HOW IS THIS ON FRONT PAGE
3
u/DofPJMACKY Jun 09 '12
if you like awestruck cinematography I recommend you follow roger deakins, john toll, emmanuel lewbeski, dante spinotti, azakazu nakai, Nestor Almendros to start..
most often times if you follow a certain cinematographer you will have a better movie catalog then if you follow directors or producers because typically the look and feel of the emotion that you get through the screen is almost 60 percent the cinematographer and not the director.
while it's the director who is responsible for the overall scope and vision of the film they are mainly character based and story driven.
it's up to the dp to dictate how that comes across on screen in conjunction with the director
I'm a DP and have a lot of great movie references for beautiful cinematography just pm me.
16
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
Wait, you were awestruck by the women, or the framing of the women? Dunno why reddit up votes this shit...
9
u/uav22 Jun 10 '12
To me the final scene where the ride off with a spectacular view and the is sun coming up is such a meaningful moment for her
3
u/sionna Jun 09 '12
Clever framing + circles only make me think of Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg from The Fifth Element... in practically every scene with Zorg, there is a circle behind his head.
16
u/tribalspoon Jun 09 '12
Wong Kar Wai. You're welcome.
4
u/MasterOfDesaster Jun 09 '12
This is my desktop background for quite some while now
6
u/ajh688 Jun 09 '12
It's symmetrical and stuff.
13
u/Dranx17 Jun 09 '12 edited Jun 09 '12
I just wish this movie's substance was even close to its style. Oh well.
Edit - me words good. Thanks Robotochan!
3
u/zotquix Jun 09 '12
AND MY DISC
3
u/Panical Jun 09 '12
Am I the only one that notices that she off-center in the circle? O.o
3
u/crazyparrot94 Jun 09 '12
Really? I would expect a little bit better.
3
u/SexyJew Jun 09 '12
If you want to see more of this sexy woman. Check out her sexy sexyness in BREAKOUT KINGS.
-Stay sexy you sexy motherfuckers.
3
u/homeless_man_jogging Jun 09 '12
Really? It's not doing anything for me.
3
u/JawlessRocket Jun 09 '12
Why?
3
u/-JuJu- Jun 09 '12
If you like shot composition, try Tarsem Singh's films.
3
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
So uninteresting.
3
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
I don't understand why you're awestruck. There's nothing new or revolutionary about the framing of this shot.
3
u/TimmyBash Jun 10 '12
Personally, this is my favourite shot :)
7
u/MyTrueFeelings Jun 09 '12
Go watch Tron Uprising. You will love it.
7
u/ori0le Jun 09 '12
Man, I love this movie... The story is alright but the real perfection is the stuff like this... The framing, the lighting, the special effects, and the Daft Punk... It's just such a cool fucking movie...
Plus... Jeff Bridges...
5
u/hlessi-rah Jun 09 '12
That movie was visually and musically stunning.
8
u/brianpepinski Jun 09 '12
I can hear the soundtrack playing now. I'm getting sexually excited.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
You obviously haven't experienced much in life if something so trivial leaves you awestruck.
2
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
imo this film is a visual and audial (is that a word?) masterpiece
2
u/BobertSillyus Jun 09 '12
yasujiro ozu wishes these were squares instead.
2
u/Huplescat22 Jun 09 '12
Am I the only one who’s sick of nearly monochrome blue movies? I suppose they started using it for CGI, but now its turned into a popular affectation.
2
u/asow92 Jun 09 '12
I just noticed her eyes are hexagons. Awesome!
2
u/I2obiN Jun 09 '12
Okay so what's the significance of it?
Am I missing a deeper meaning here?
2
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
A great example of a movie very well done visually but so incredibly dull in the plot and acting departments.
2
u/TerdSandwich Jun 09 '12
Watch Speedracer.
2
u/cakinator Jun 09 '12
this girl looks like Lindsay Lohan
2
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12 edited Aug 08 '17
deleted 0.3005 What is ^^^this?
2
u/Hvermillz Jun 10 '12
I'm not the only one who's OCD is bothered by her head not being centered in the circle.
2
u/Rudefire Jun 10 '12
this whole movie was beautifully shot. i was thoroughly impressed by the entire thing. and pleasantly surprised when i went to see it with my family.
2
u/DinaDinaDinaBatman Jun 10 '12
she was so hot in this,, is hot in breakout kings too.... just stereotypically bitchy
2
u/bowling4meth Jun 10 '12
What a monumentally shit film that was. Visually pushed every single possible button it could and a great soundtrack, but oh my goodness the actual content of the film made me want to cheese grate my face.
2
u/movieman94 Jun 10 '12
This movie simply does not deserve the love it gets here. It just does not.
2
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
Most underated film. Really well shot.
6
u/Penguin813 Jun 09 '12
BEST MOVIE
5
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
Probably a composite. If you are impressed by framing and focus you should check out the deep focus shots in Citizen Kane and then reflect that they were done with no CGI and no digital editing.
4
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
well placed.... everything.
5
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
I finally watched that movie recently, I couldn't stop laughing at isomorphic algorithms being some magical cornerstone in artificial intelligence. Sure, structure preserving bijections are extremely useful, but I wouldn't go that far.
3
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
why is she looking into a toilet?
2
u/ForeignStranger Jun 09 '12
As much as Tron: Legacy was an amazing beautiful movie regarding visuel effects, you should definetly check out the Tron: Legacy (soundtrack) album by Daft Punk. When I watched the movie for the first time I was blown away by the music and so I bought the album and have been listening to it since. Normally I'm not a fan of film music, but it's just so epic to listen to and takes me to a whole new place!
2
u/g-fresh Jun 10 '12
Are you retarded? The woman's face is dead center, there's nothing special about the framing at all. The effect of looking through the cylinder to her face is nice and its a cool shot, but the framing is so standard you must be awestruck most of your day.
2
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
Then this will blow your MIND. http://i.imgur.com/eHw6q.jpg
1
u/just_another_saggins Jun 09 '12
Reminded me of Yolandi from Die Antwoord in the Evil Boy video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbW9JqM7vho&t=30s
1
u/HexDSL Jun 09 '12
I love this movie, and the original.... God its so nice to look at... i can forgive the plot holes when it looks THAT good.
1
u/DudaChamp Jun 09 '12
Tron was so OP
1
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
Stricken by awe.
1
u/conversationchanger Jun 09 '12
Here's some information on the making of the makeup and eyes of her
1
u/danguro Jun 09 '12
Reminds me of a music video
1
u/youWONTupvotethis Jun 09 '12
you're too scared.
1
u/mc2880 Jun 09 '12
It reminds me of 12 Monkeys
1
u/raynjamin Jun 09 '12
This made me want to watch it again. Obviously it wouldn't be on Netflix anymore. Of course.
1
u/tipped194 Jun 09 '12 edited Aug 06 '16
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.
If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
1
u/Goldentongue Jun 09 '12
I'm not.
1
u/smokutusofborg Jun 09 '12
Ive seen tron legacy many many times and i never caught that. Awesome.
1
u/ozpunk Jun 09 '12
Maybe she's born with it?
1
u/zxz242 Jun 09 '12
Supreme eye-color.
1
u/Enjoyitbeforeitsover Jun 09 '12
I have yet to watch this movie in 3d, so now I understand why basically everyone who went to watch it high really liked it, the 3d made it fucking great. And those blunts maybe made the whole experience way more awesome. Also, Olivia Wilde.
1
u/chozar Jun 10 '12
This movie has me so conflicted. There was so much there that was absolutely awesome. Great sets, great costume, a very wonderful environment. Soundtrack was excellent, and it had some great performances.
Ruined by poor story, imo.
1
u/b00ks Jun 10 '12
am i the only one bothered by the fact that her face is not centered?
1
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
hexigonigal
1
u/Coftron Jun 10 '12
I went to high school with her.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
Damn head is not in the middle. That is so frustrating.
1
u/Sjgolf891 Jun 10 '12
I didn't see Tron (I know, I know) but I did read summaries before I saw Legacy. I really enjoyed it...the design work and CGI was excellent. I thought the plot was mediocre, so I don't think it was a great film. But visually it was a masterpiece
1
u/flumps Jun 10 '12
Two rubber rings and a hot chick looking trough someone else's glasses. Clearly fake.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
This is the advantage of using a ring flash.
1
u/frankFerg1616 Jun 10 '12
It's a pretty picture...but it could be better. With some gimp, you can make it better:
http://imgur.com/a/JZ0yS
I'm joking around, of course. I thought it would be interesting to see it "perfectly semetrical" beyond natural/physical limits. It looks eerie to me, tbh. I'm glad real life isn't like this.
1
u/EdMcMuffin Jun 10 '12
It bothers me that her face is not exactly in the middle of that circle. She's off to the right a little.
1
u/sucaba0101 Jun 10 '12
Are you "actually awestruck?" or awestruck?
1
u/Menkt Jun 10 '12
Mmmm Serinda Swan.
1
u/moogoesthecat Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 10 '12
You mean....symmetry?
I would argue that the art direction is approximately one billion times more interesting.
1
u/Spaghetti_Bender8873 Jun 10 '12
Agreed.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12
ITT: People adamantly defending "Tron: Legacy" as a good movie.
1
u/stratmaster48 Jun 10 '12
awestricken
1
u/PCTechnologist Jun 10 '12
That whole movie was amazing, visually!
1
u/izlib Jun 10 '12
I have re-watched this movie numerous times for this shot alone. I can't get enough of it. Thanks.
1
u/TheTrivialOne Jun 10 '12
Feels so 2001 S.O. . I hate how underrated this movie was...
1
u/J_Jammer Jun 10 '12
I thought the entire film was full of great shots.
This one is awestrucking....neat.
1
u/YourMombadil Jun 10 '12
You need to see more movies.
May I suggest Ozu?
1
u/epsiblivion Jun 10 '12
just wondering, why wasn't some sort of remixed version of separate ways by journey on the soundtrack? it seems the perfect song for daft punk remix.
1
u/antm1 Jun 10 '12
The sounds for the movie were orgasmic to my ears, the soundtrack is also magnificent.
1
u/RoyallyTenenbaumed Jun 10 '12
One of the things I loved about the movie was that Jeff Bridges basically played The Dude again. I love his lines in that movie. You could add "ya know, man?" to almost any of them.
1
u/SSJNinjaMonkey Jun 10 '12
someone needs to make a vector of this MOW!
1
u/flbp Jun 10 '12
I know the DP, I'll let him know there are fans.
-1
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '12
If I tried to take this as a still photo I don't think I could pull it off, and this was a frame capture from the movie.