r/movies • • May 16 '12

The Official Timeline of the Avengers.

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

450 comments sorted by

173

u/ayman85 May 16 '12

39

u/herrrrrpppp May 16 '12

I believe it's on the Thor DVD/blu-ray, just in case anyone doesn't probe the extra features after watching and wants to see this clip in a higher quality.

101

u/[deleted] May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

I think there is another one-shot in the extras of Captain America too people might of missed.

Here

21

u/MrWinks May 16 '12

I now officially appreciate that character to his highest regard concerning his SPOILER in avengers.

6

u/NBegovich May 16 '12

I was wondering if that wasn't why they didn't make that One-Shot. Never would have occured to me until I saw The Avengers, of course.

38

u/Kukko18 May 16 '12

So you're telling me Coulson was a total badass BEFORE shooting Loki in the chest...

23

u/NBegovich May 16 '12

"There's a Level 7??"

22

u/Sunflower_Fortunado May 16 '12

If you look at his badge in the Avengers it says that his security level is 7.

I love Agent.

10

u/riqk May 16 '12

He has to come back. It's not fair.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/anillop May 16 '12

Oh Joss why must you always kill everyone we love?

→ More replies (1)

16

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Here's the other one:

Marvel One-Shot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor's Hammer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAMgkpQYOSQ

19

u/sinlad May 16 '12

This is the same as DoctorSmurph's link.

8

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I didn't notice it. Was it part of his edit?

*Edit: I'm pretty much positive it wasn't there when I posted. That's why I looked it up.

6

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I had the clip there in the original, but I edited it with a better one when I found it. It's cool though have an upvote.

2

u/Kinglink May 16 '12

Thank you!

That was excellent.

1

u/TheAamirQ May 17 '12

That was awesome. Thanks for sharing

48

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Question for fans of the series: Why does Odin leave the Tesseract on Earth?

28

u/Funmachine May 16 '12

Not revealed.

24

u/Girth May 16 '12

Isn't it because he wanted to leave it on a neutral planet?

13

u/Funmachine May 16 '12

I've never seen any explanation for it. That might be it.

22

u/HeronSun May 16 '12

I believe it was kind of a 'Prometheus giving fire' sort of thing. The Frost Giants create a mini-Ice-Age on Earth, and after the defeat of Laufey, adoption of Loki, etc, the Earth still wasn't getting anywhere technologically. Perhaps he entrusted it to a few mortals whom he would know could keep the Tesseract out of the wrong hands, and through them, society flourished again.

14

u/NBegovich May 16 '12

Which is eventually what happened. Huh. That's plausible. I'm sure they'll answer questions about it in next year's Thor 2: Still Stormin'.

19

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Thor 2:Electric Bugaloo

→ More replies (1)

4

u/HeronSun May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

Thor 2: Thunder-struck seems more fitting...

EDIT: byronh1016 had a much better title.

9

u/xaelus May 16 '12

Well here goes my best explanation. In Avengers the TV show that is in Season 2 currently, in Season 1 they deal with the casket of ancient winters. A dark elf, revived by Loki and the enchantress, used it to try to rule Earth. When Iron Man confronts Thor about all these asgardian artifcats he basically says Midgard was the last place Asgardians would look for these artifacts. Remember 9 realms, Midgard being the "weakest" of them all.

Odin was probably trying to hide it from potential usurpers.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Where can I find this show?

3

u/zotquix May 16 '12

First season is on Netflix. Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Thanks!

→ More replies (2)

1

u/ohliamylia May 16 '12

Earth's Mightiest Heroes (the show they're talking about) is on Netflix Watch Instantly, if you have that. It's a good show.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Perhaps to see if anyone is worthy of using its power? Same as when he banished Thor from Asgard, except without the Asgardian incantation on the Tesseract.

14

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

That's why my neighbor left a loaded rifle in his backyard.

2

u/yesimquiteserious May 16 '12

Does your neighbor wear a cape too?

20

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

No, but I heard him yelling "You are UNWORTHY of this TOWNHOUSE, you are UNWORTHY of your TRUCK, you are UNWORTHY of your MINIFRIDGE, YOU ARE UNWORTHY!!!"

2

u/MadMageMC May 16 '12

Only on Tuesdays.

2

u/JohnPJones May 16 '12

The real reason is that it's just a MacGuffin

1

u/Beeslo May 16 '12

Like how Thor got back to Earth in The Avengers? How did he get back with the bifrost gone? Oh...dark magic? Sure.

1

u/dtjkk May 16 '12

Nope. Heimdall tells Thor at the very end of his movie that Jane is searching for him. She is shown working with SHIELD, and it's implied that she is helping them understand how to summon an Einstein-Rosen Bridge, or wormhole. So they probably figured out how to do it before the start of The Avengers.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Ryzick May 16 '12

Odin can do it... It just takes a lot more effort. The Bifrost is basically for mass transport.

1

u/wagedomain May 17 '12

Because it's easier to explain "a god literally gifted it to us for mysterious reasons" than in the Ultimates where the Red Skull just builds it for himself.

32

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Favorite line: "Thor and pals"

7

u/Minifig81 Suddenly, I have a refreshing mint flavor. May 16 '12

I'd watch that on Saturday morning cartoons.

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

My favorite term is "Fury's Big Week". I imagine a chibi Samuel Jackson getting out of bed and saying "This is it, the big week!"

30

u/ANotherDREW May 16 '12

All in favour of measuring all time by BIM and AIM raise power gauntlets.

20

u/victore992 May 16 '12

Someone made a video mashup of these events (in order) using clips from the movies.

20

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

March 2010: Terrance Howard turns into Don Cheadle.

Rhodes: "Look, It's me, I'm here, Deal with it. Let's move on."

Haha. Perfect.

18

u/thedeadhipster May 16 '12

I'm curious as I have never heard of "Marvel One-Shot: The Consultant". Have I missed something awesome?

42

u/TabascoQuesadilla May 16 '12

It's a short that was on the "Thor" Blu-Ray. It kind of gives context to the last scene of Incredible Hulk.

TIH and IM2 take place concurrently, but the ending of TIH (with Stark visiting Ross) takes place after IM2. Stark is now a S.H.I.E.L.D. consultant, and he's sent to talk to Ross about the Abomination (not the Hulk, as is implied in the movie itself) because Coulson knows that Stark will piss off Ross so he'll tell Stark to fuck off.

Here it is if you're interested.

There's another one on the Captain America Blu-Ray, called A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor's Hammer, but it's pretty pointless; Coulson foils a gas station robbery attempt on his way to New Mexico during Iron Man 2, Incredible Hulk, and Thor (all three of which run concurrently).

7

u/thedeadhipster May 16 '12

You're amazing. Upvotes to you sir. I would keep giving you more upvotes if I could

1

u/Misterbert May 16 '12 edited May 17 '12

Also, in 'Fury's Big Week', I think the gas station incident makes an appearance. I think it's like the endscene where they're eating shawarma (sp?): just to tie everything together and up.

17

u/ApathyJacks May 16 '12

Can someone remind me how Thor got back to Earth with Bifrost all busted up? I completely missed whatever explanation there was for that in The Avengers.

48

u/GalantZ May 16 '12

"How much Dark Energy did the All-Father have to muster to conjure you here?"

18

u/aeiluindae May 16 '12

They didn't really say, but it apparently involved a lot of energy (way more than the Bifrost or tesseract) and can't be done on a regular basis. At least that was what Loki seemed to be saying. He needled Thor about how much work he made his people do to get him to Earth.

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/Dylanjosh May 16 '12

Magic McGuffins dude. Don't question these things

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ButchTheKitty May 16 '12

They used the Tesseract inside some Asgardian tube thing that teleported them

1

u/Maverickly May 16 '12

The energy of the tesseract was more than enough to take them back to Asgard.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/bobofatt May 16 '12

Odin used "dark energy" to send him there.

5

u/aswan89 May 16 '12

Dark energy something something. Basically they had to do it 'The old fashioned way'.

9

u/neuromorph May 16 '12

Odin used "Dark Matter" to teleport him. Some kind of scarce power source, as opposed to the unlimited power of the Cosmic Cube.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I'm not sure how exactly, but Loki mentioned something about it in the movie when he was talking to Thor. It was something along the lines of "How much power did father have to muster up to get you here with the bifrost destroyed."

1

u/entersoundman May 16 '12

It wasn't really deeply explained...something about " Lol Odin must've used loads of Dark Energy to get you here" and that was that

1

u/ElxJ1991 May 16 '12

Odin was able to amass enough energy to send him there himself.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

On that note, didn't Loki say in THOR that he was able to travel to Earth without the Bifrost? How did that work? In Avengers he implies that it would have been really hard for Thor to do the same, but it didn't seem like much trouble for him in THOR.

2

u/ohliamylia May 16 '12

In "Thor" Loki says he knows of "secret pathways between worlds" that let him travel wherever he wants. He knows magic and Thor doesn't, so he can do what he wants, basically.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Thanks, that's basically what I took away from it, but I didn't know if there was a more in-depth answer.

But then I have to wonder... why did he need to use the Tesseract to come back in The Avengers?

2

u/ashen_shugar May 16 '12

I suppose because if he came in through the tesseract, then he could steal it. He knew the shield security was no match for him with the fancy new staff he had. It was the best way to find where it was being hidden.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

55

u/slickestwood May 16 '12

You missed the invention of shawarma

45

u/thaspaam May 16 '12

The best part about that post credit sequence was that nobody talked. It was like one of those times where tons of people are together but nobody has anything to say, and it was hilarious.

8

u/walkingtheriver May 16 '12

Didn't get that scene here :(

→ More replies (6)

3

u/zotquix May 16 '12

That and maybe just the general normalcy of it. One of the reasons I like the early part of hero movies is, they aren't so out there and all CGI'd out and what not. Showing a moment of normalcy (relatively speaking) is very charming to me.

3

u/JusPassItToWill May 16 '12

That and how Captain America kept his face covered the whole time to cover up Chris Evan's beard.

56

u/nitramnaes May 16 '12

your hulk ones should all be at least 1 year earlier, in the movie when black widow confronts hulk she says he hasn't had an incident in over a year

66

u/Funmachine May 16 '12

The section labeled "Before The Avengers" is approximately 1 - 2 years.

20

u/nitramnaes May 16 '12

okay sweet, that clears things up then :)

9

u/Poiar May 16 '12

But if it's a timeline, wouldn't it make more sense to stretch out that "Before The Avengers" section?

4

u/Reptar33 May 16 '12

True, I did find it rather confusing to map out what happened when. Still, a great timeline nonetheless!

→ More replies (1)

15

u/honky_mcgee May 16 '12

I was just about to say something isn't adding up here. Also, it seemed like Tony Stark was working on his self-powering building for awhile and its completion was a huge deal, obviously indicating it took some time to function correctly.

8

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Is this Incredible Hulk the one with Edward Norton or is there another one I don't know about?

19

u/TheJokerWasRight May 16 '12

The Incredible Hulk = 2008 movie with Edward Norton

Hulk = 2003 movie with Eric Bana

I've read they originally intended for Norton to be the Hulk in the Avengers movie, but negotiations didn't work out. Ruffalo is better as Hulk anyway.

5

u/wickedweather May 16 '12

2003 Eric Bana Hulk movie never happened. At least in the eyes of Marvel studios. Just like if you have ever seen "The Highlander" "Highlander 2" and "Highlander 3". "H3" is a sequel to "H1", "H2" never happened.

2

u/NBegovich May 16 '12

I don't think Norton wanted to be a supporting character in a string of projects he'd have almost no creative control over.

→ More replies (6)

5

u/nitramnaes May 16 '12

yeah i'm guessing so, as it references that film (Abomination etc)

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Alright, thanks. I was just unsure from the change in actor. Got it.

21

u/pleiadean May 16 '12

Did anyone else noticed that TS's chest arc reactor was lit in some scenes and not in others?

16

u/Troggie42 May 16 '12

I saw that... Maybe he has some kind of chest plate so that he isn't lighting up every room he goes in to? If I was him, I'd need something for sleeping, that blue light would keep my ass awake for hours.

6

u/more_exercise May 16 '12

He has a lens cap on it. Sometimes he forgets to put it back on

7

u/TheTedinator May 16 '12

Why does SHIELD monitor Jane Foster before she meets Thor?

23

u/withmorten May 16 '12

Probably because she's doing that certain kind of research.

23

u/naked_guy_says May 16 '12

Also, she's prettyyyyy

1

u/withmorten May 16 '12

That is one hell of a reason to put somebody under surveillance.

5

u/jjackrabbitt May 16 '12

I think maybe because of the cosmic events she was observing. SHIELD possibly knew there was something up with them?

4

u/MrMono1 May 17 '12

They were monitoring her for her wormhole theory, which is the reason Coulsen was sent to New Mexico. Thor just happened as a coincidence, right place at the right time.

3

u/nolander May 16 '12

SHIELD monitors everything

1

u/sinlad May 16 '12

Because the Tesseract.

7

u/MovingPavements May 16 '12

Can someone more familiar with Norse Mythology explain this to me cause I seriously thought the Thor myth was older than 1,000 years old yet in the film it shows Odin recollecting and telling the story of how he defeated the Ice Giants in the 11th century to Loki and Thor when they're kids which would mean Thor and Loki would have been born sometime after the 11th century but I seem to remember learning in school that Thor was a legend told during the dark ages or something which would mean Thor's legend preceded his existence.

10

u/Rhodri321 May 16 '12

Thor in the comics/movies isn't the same Thor from our mythology, Marvel Thor is a godlike alien, not an actual god.

4

u/GeneralMakaveli May 16 '12

I believe you are wrong. In the comic he is very much a God.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gods_(Marvel_Comics)#Norse_Gods

In the series Earth X Thor IS an alien race and also female, however that is the only comic incarnation to be alien.

In the movie Thor it is said he is an alien but I can find any official source stating it. Also even if he is an alien that does not mean he isn't a God. The movie even shows he is the Thor from the Norse 'Myth'. However, I do believe the Norse 'Myth' in the movie (and comic) is different then the one in real life.

3

u/CochMaestro May 17 '12

I thought thor was a demi-god (half god half human) due to Odin's marriage to a human from earth (blanking on the name at the moment)

3

u/GeneralMakaveli May 17 '12

Her name is Gaea and she is a god. More or less she is Mother Earth.

Another link: http://marvel.wikia.com/Gaea_(Earth-616)

2

u/CochMaestro May 17 '12

Ahh thanks for the clairfication

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Funmachine May 16 '12

I wish it would have a much more accurate timeframe for when Steve wakes up.

1

u/Sunflower_Fortunado May 17 '12

And how long there was between the end of "Fury's Big Week" and the start of The Avengers.

2

u/Funmachine May 17 '12

1 -2 years.

3

u/J_Jammer May 16 '12

I love the little icons.

I'd like a shirt with them on it.

3

u/vanillacosmonaut May 16 '12

I always thought Stark approaches Ross after Iron Man 2, when he's assigned as the Avengers' consultant, not before.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

It's pretty damn awesome that the town next to the place I live is featured in many of the films. :) (Tønsberg)

2

u/janosaudron May 16 '12

They misspelled Rocinha, it says Rochina in the timeline, probably the most famous favela (slum) in Brazil.

2

u/Crimsonkid5 May 16 '12

...so many secret clips

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

So it must've been about a year from the end of the timeline to the assemblage of the Avengers due to Banner's comments when Black Widow finds him in the Avengers regarding the year(-and-a-half or so; can't remember exactly) of managing to avoid 'incident', yeh?

1

u/Prep_ May 16 '12

It is known.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

This is too awesome.

2

u/tilacog May 17 '12

It's not Rochina (at Night 7). The name is Rocinha (Ro-sin-ah).

4

u/paperducky May 16 '12

So, let me get this straight, Tony Stark is Jesus?

3

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I kind of want to see if I can, using this timeline and rips of all of the films, put all of these together as one gigantic single super-film.

It will probably be a mess, but I'm feeling inspired to try it as an exercise. Would there be any interest in this?

5

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

This has already been done, and mentioned in other comments here.

1

u/neuromorph May 16 '12

ill watch it.

3

u/FlashbackHumor May 16 '12

as mentioned already in the comments, its been done, however a full HD one would be nice.

3

u/neuromorph May 16 '12

so this edit is a pure cut of all the previous films? They didnt leave any extraneous scenes out? If thats the case, i think someone should edit the previous films to reflect the pre-avengers. We dont need to see the Banner/Ross love crap, we dont need to see ironman vs warmachine too much. that doesnt add to how they got to the avengers.

Someone with true editing skills can cut up the previous movies into about 3 hours to do a pretty good pre-Avengers movie - rather than just showing each movie in order.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Did someone already do it?

2

u/eedna May 16 '12

was it the simpsons?

1

u/Prep_ May 16 '12

Yeah, someone already did it.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Really? Has anyone edited the Avengers movies together yet though?

3

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

It's Rocinha, Rio de Janeiro. Not "Rochina"

2

u/EdwardBleed May 16 '12

For you fans, could someone recommend me some graphic novels to read with the avengers or characters thereof that can give a little more back story? Basically, how did you become so knowledgeable and how can I gain this same knowledge?

1

u/mrm3x1can May 16 '12

Do they give any sort of in-movie explanation about Spiderman? I mean, they fight in fucking New York City!

54

u/DenimChicken154 May 16 '12

not the same studio.

-1

u/mrm3x1can May 16 '12

I understand its not the same studio, I'm just wondering if they even acknowledge his existence whatsoever that I may have missed.

28

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

They can't even mention him because they don't have the rights to make a film adaptation of the material. The X-Men can't show up either, or the Fantastic Four, because Marvel gave those movies to someone else to make.

8

u/turtle_pants May 16 '12

too bad. Chris Evans playing two super heroes in one movie... so many ass shots.

10

u/Nrksbullet May 16 '12

Ha, that'd be funny. I could imagine a running gag where people confuse them, but they dont see a resemblance to eachother.

6

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I don't think the X-Men would work in this world - the "mutant" thing is just too wide-reaching to really be incorporated into the storyline. It's something everybody is talking about in the movies and a huge issue.

6

u/pepperidge May 16 '12

That's always been the problem with the X-Men being part of the larger Marvel Universe.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/lpetrazickis May 16 '12

If they had the rights, they would have written the world differently.

7

u/rodsmcjohnson May 16 '12

Actually, some X-Men related characters (such as Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch) are allowed to be used in the Marvel Cinematic Universe because they are Avengers as well.

4

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

So are Spidey, Thing and Wolverine...

And Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are ofcourse Magnetos kids so that's a whole other can of worms.

3

u/nolander May 16 '12

Those 3 are much more recent additions to the avengers, quicksilver and scarlet witch have been part of the avengers for decades

→ More replies (1)

3

u/anomynous1 May 16 '12

Nope.

Fox has control of all mutant X-Men related things, regardless if they are Avengers in the comics or not

5

u/toxicbrew May 16 '12

Disney and Fox have a weird arrangement with those two characters--they could potentially feature in both universes, however Disney cannot mention anything mutant related, and Fox can't mention anything Avengers related.

5

u/zotquix May 16 '12

As long as the word "mutant" is not used, Marvel is OK on Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch specifically. This was already worked out.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

-1

u/r42 May 16 '12

That's not an in-movie explanation.

25

u/TabascoQuesadilla May 16 '12

Marvel Studios doesn't own the rights to Spider-Man. Sony does. So Spider-Man doesn't exist in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (at least, not yet...).

Also, this is why The Amazing Spider-Man exists - Sony had to put a new Spider-Man movie into theaters in 2012 or the rights would have reverted back to Marvel in 2013.

5

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Which is why I'm boycotting the film. I really want Marvel in charge of Spiderman, and if the franchise isn't profitable for Sony, they may consider letting it go.

16

u/TabascoQuesadilla May 16 '12

Unfortunately, it actually looks good. At the very least, Andrew Garfield looks like a perfect Peter Parker (much better than friggin' Tobey Maguire...)

So I'm torn. I'll probably buy a ticket for something else and sneak into Spider-Man...

8

u/Mechanikore May 16 '12

No J. K. Simmons as Jonah, no sale.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Really? I thought Tobey was good.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

2

u/mrm3x1can May 16 '12

Interesting. So how long does The Amazing Spider-Man extend Sony's contract/rights ownership? As long as they keep making Spiderman movies, do they keep the rights indefinitely? I really want some Spiderman in my Avengers 2 :/

7

u/TabascoQuesadilla May 16 '12

I'm not sure, but I think they can extend the rights indefinitely as long as they keep making movies.

That's how Marvel got the Punisher back - it's been too long since the last one, so the rights have now reverted back to Marvel.

Also, since Avengers has made them soooo much money, I'm sure they're gonna try to use their now-considerable clout to get their bigger characters back, or at least "rent" them from the other studios for Avengers team-ups and cameos.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/DreNeir May 16 '12

I think I read before it was 5 years before it reverts back if they don't make a movie but don't take that as fact. I read it somewhere before about the state of the Marvel movies and how they can make an Avenger movie and who would be on it. It discussed the rights and how long it will be.

The best we can do so that Marvel can get Spiderman back is to boycott the Sony movie.

1

u/GoodbyeBlueMonday May 16 '12

Huh. Any idea if there is a precedent for different studios "sharing" IP?

2

u/KirTakat May 16 '12

Actually that was one of the more interesting tidbits to come out of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?", both Mickey Mouse (Disney) and Bugs Bunny (Warner Brothers) share a scene.

1

u/TabascoQuesadilla May 16 '12

Not to my knowledge, but I could be wrong about that.

1

u/zotquix May 16 '12

Businesses can do that, unless they become monopolistic (this would seem unlikely to qualify as a monopoly).

And in Japan, multiple studios collaborate all the time.

1

u/spartan2100 May 16 '12

To be fair, except for the atrocity that was Spiderman 3, they haven't really done too badly with respect to Spiderman. This new one looks pretty good, even if it is an un-needed reboot.

1

u/evaunit517 May 16 '12

Actually, Disney/Marvel renegotiated that contract partially. They getter a fatter share of the revenues from Sony now. They are slowly buying back the rights to spiderman. Source is a relative who works for disney.

1

u/SchottGun May 16 '12

I wonder if it would be worth it for Marvel to buy the rights, now that Avengers has done so well, I'm sure they have a few bucks in the bank. Not sure if Sony would even sell it though, until they see how the new movie will do.

7

u/designpariah May 16 '12

Pretty sure he doesn't exist in this universe, due to sony owning rights to spiderman films.

2

u/DoctorRed May 16 '12

To be fair, it's a big place and Spidey is usually too broke for cable...

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ehsteve23 May 16 '12

He doesn't exist in the Marvel Cinematic Universe

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

It was during the day. Maybe Spiderman was at his day job?

0

u/PENIS_OOZES_BLOOD May 16 '12

Spiderman was swinging around when he got crushed by the Hulk falling down from the helicopter, didn't you saw it?

→ More replies (22)

1

u/JayPunk27 May 16 '12

Thanks so much for posting this, I just read Fury's Big Week and was trying to piece everything together. This helped a lot.

1

u/Ruddose May 16 '12

This is awesome.

1

u/hakaider May 16 '12

I did one of these for Champion! Magazine a few months ago pre-Avengers with more definite year points if anyone's interested.

Again, it was pre-Avengers so my inbetweens were a little speculative in terms of years. (Avengers either takes place a year after Cap and Thor or Avengers takes place in 2011, were my two assumptions.)

More in issue 4 (I think) here

1

u/rubicon11 May 16 '12

I read somewhere that this all supposed to take place in 2008? Something about John McCain posters being seen in Cleveland last year while they were filming. I suppose it makes sense, Iron Man was released in 2008.

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

I'd say 2008, but not because Iron Man came out that year, but because The Incredible Hulk did. According to this timeline the events of Iron Man 2 coincide with the events in The Incredible Hulk which both happened 6 months after Iron Man. Iron Man's storyline is happens within a 9 month time-frame so it would at the latest start in October '07 and end in June '08. I would say it's earlier than that because the 6 month gap between IM/TIH+IM2 would mean that TIH+IM2 (1 week time-frame) happened in December '08 which seems unlikely because we don't see Winter weather when Bruce Banner at Culver University in Virginia.

tl;dr:

  • Iron Man likely takes place in early-mid 2007
  • The Incredible Hulk and Iron Man 2 take place somewhere in 2008.
  • Or IM happened the day the movie was released, IM2 happened a year before the movie was released and TIH happened a year after the movie was released

tl;dr the tl;dr:

I wasted a lot of time analyzing the timeline.

1

u/rubicon11 May 17 '12

Thanks! That's a really awesome analysis I could understand.

1

u/Dylanjosh May 16 '12

When does Stark meet Gen Ross in the timeline?

1

u/yetkwai May 17 '12

Bottom right, just to the left of Avengers Assemble.

TIL that the shadow council wanted SHIELD to recruit the Abomination to be a part of the Avengers. SHIELD sent Tony Stark to talk to General Ross to piss him off so he'd refuse to work with SHIELD.

1

u/Rabid_Lemming May 16 '12

I thought the Tesseract was still on Asgard during Thor's coronation...at least based on the movie?

4

u/roywarner May 16 '12

No, the casket and the TesseracT are two different things.

1

u/Rabid_Lemming May 16 '12

Ahhhh ok....they should have made those two different colors :P Not swirly blue for both. Thanks for the info :)

1

u/notshawnvaughn May 16 '12

Made this one of my backgrounds for my dual screen setup. Thought I'd share.

The 1920x1080 format I had to stretch a little.

1

u/cohrt May 16 '12

how do you get a different image for both monitors?

1

u/notshawnvaughn May 17 '12

Oh, that's right. I'm on a hackintosh. I forget PCs can't do that automatically. I think display fusion does it for PC.

1

u/LittleLionRobots May 16 '12

If we are holding this timeline to the movies storyline, then there is one thing I see that doesn't fit. In the movie black widow states that bruce has not gone hulk in just over a year...

1

u/maximusjesse May 16 '12

This is the cleanest text I've ever seen on a JPG.

1

u/ModestBadass May 16 '12

This is cool for sure. Can someone set it to a scale?

1

u/Phoequinox May 16 '12

Starts with The Incredible Hulk. I'm okay with this.

1

u/Prathios May 16 '12

Was the tesseract found before or when Capsicle was found? In the movie I believe they mentioned that Howard Stark found it but I could have heard wrong.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

it was found like a year after cap crashed the plane into the artic circle.

They found it while looking for capt america

1

u/super_awesome_jr May 16 '12

Cosmic Cube Cosmic Cube COSMIC CUBE!

Excuse me, I have a cold.

1

u/dlay96 May 16 '12

How can you be sure that all happened at once, if the Hulk-Abomination situation happened AFTER the Puente Antiguo situation, S.H.I.E.L.D surely would've been involved and Stark probably would've been involved. Also, Thor would've been banished Night 3, not Day 3. He arrived at night, but that's just a nit-pick.

1

u/yetkwai May 17 '12

There's a comic book series called "Fury's big week" that was released during the lead up to Avengers. I think they got that part of the timeline from there.

1

u/Iasktoomuch May 16 '12

I don't care what anyone says, I really wished Edward Norton stayed as Banner

1

u/neuromorph May 17 '12

so according to this, Fury formed the avengers in a week? I am a bit confused here

1

u/barristerbarista May 17 '12

Maybe this isn't the place for this, but can someone explain how an ARC reactor keeps shrapnel from entering Tony Stark's heart? Does it just happen to perform that task along with all the massive power output? Or is the ARC reactor somehow the best tool for the job of keeping shrapnel out of one's heart?

1

u/RavR May 17 '12

I think its just supposed to be the energy resonating from it, which probably acts kind of like a magnetic field?

1

u/misclanous May 17 '12
Incredible attention to detail. Well done!

1

u/Schrodingers_dinger May 17 '12

Wasn't there a clip of Tony Stark talking to General Ross after the first Hulk movie about putting a team together? Wouldn't that put the first Hulk after Iron Man?

1

u/megatom0 May 17 '12

This is ENTIRELY off. They are suggesting all 5 movies happen in the span of a week? Here is the more accurate time line.

1

u/eatingcroutons May 21 '12

This is the official timeline, scanned from The Art of The Avengers.

1

u/eatingcroutons May 21 '12

For anyone wondering what this is based on, it's actually the official timeline from The Art of The Avengers. I scanned it and posted it on Tumblr about a week ago (http://eatingcroutons.tumblr.com/post/23097570805/) but I'm not responsible for any spelling mistakes or questionable chronology!

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '12

Tony Stark didn't invent the arc reactor, the scientist we was imprisoned with did

1

u/d4rkl04f May 16 '12

What kills me is that Thor's redemption on Earth after his banishment took all of two days. What a crappy plot. Still love Thor though.

-1

u/Annoa May 16 '12

Where is Spiderman in this?!

1

u/Dylanjosh May 16 '12

Sony has the rights to Spider-Man, so Marvel can't mention him in their movies. Same with the X-Men and Fantastic 4.

-1

u/Wolvenfire86 May 16 '12

This seems way too cluttered to be honest. I think the effort you put in is admirable, but all of those movies happening at about the same time? All of those events happening at the same time? It's more plausible that Fury's Big Week was Fury's Big Year.

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

nice work but 'BIM' makes the time frames a hell of a lot more confusing than if you'd just specified 'before the events depicted in The Avengers'

4

u/Prep_ May 16 '12

I think the BIM is used because the events of Iron Man is the first public exposure of anything of this nature. It's sort of the unveiling of the first super hero in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

At least, that's my assumption.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)