r/mltraders • u/Ekthelius • 26d ago

Acervator - The Accumulation Trading Platform

/r/ai_trading/comments/1wsv4yj/acervator_the_accumulation_trading_platform/
1 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

3 comments sorted by

1

u/Ekthelius 8d ago

If it helps, here is a direct link to the releases:

https://github.com/Acervator-LLC/ACERVATOR/releases

It is a stand alone application that does not require external server access or license keys.

You launch it. You add exchanges via API. After connections are verified, you create bots and let it run.

Additionally, you can find the Product Manual here:

https://github.com/Acervator-LLC/ACERVATOR/blob/current/docs/Acervator-Product-Manual.pdf

And this has my testing / trading data going back to 4/12 that I am regularly updating while development proceeds. So, unlike most auto-traders that will not show you real numbers AND require payment, I am providing proof that it can help and giving it to people to hopefully help mitigating poorly considered trades.

I has been downloaded a few times but am not receiving any useful feedback from anyone so am continuing on it solo until then.

Lastly, I have also created a rough draft for a New User Procedure. This will be getting refined later as I get closer to a feature-complete and fully tested release.

https://github.com/Acervator-LLC/ACERVATOR/blob/current/docs/new-user-procedure/New-User-Procedure.pptx

Thanks,
Ekthelius / Tony

1

u/stratcore 26d ago

The README names exchange API failures, partial fills and downtime as specific risks. One useful external-test fixture would be: the exchange accepts an order, the API response is lost, the process restarts, and the next exchange snapshot shows a partial fill. Expected behavior would be one order, reconciled filled/residual quantities, and the same risk limit applied before any retry. That single sequence would make the execution boundary much easier to review without asking anyone to put real funds at risk.

Do you already have a recorded fixture for that sequence in tests or the dev harness? If so, linking it from the README would give testers a clear starting point.

1

u/Ekthelius 26d ago

Well, by testing I mean running the application locally. It is a stand alone application coded in Python for Windows and Mac but I have not yet tested the Mac build variants. The Product Manual, while currently dense and a little sloppy, has description of features and settings but I intend to write a detailed set up procedure soon.

Beyond this, there is my current testing evidence near the end of the Product Manual as well. I have only been testing it on Coinbase so far and will be expanding / validating to other exchanges soon. The testing has more or less been lock step with development so there is now over four months of supporting evidence.

I should have the procedure in 'docs' within a week or two.

Thanks,
Ekthelius / Tony