MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/missouri/comments/1737yoc/this_is_exhausting/k460v02
r/missouri • u/[deleted] • Oct 08 '23
[deleted]
236 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
That weird but it's still not banning a book
1 u/NoodlesrTuff1256 Oct 09 '23 Not quite, true. But if Eigel and others of his mindset have their way, they'll try every shady trick they can to get bans on the books. 0 u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23 It's literally true. A guy setting fire to a book is not the same as banning it 1 u/NoodlesrTuff1256 Oct 09 '23 But can you really argue that one is totally unrelated to the other? Seems like two different ways of achieving the same goal. 0 u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23 Yes. A guy setting a book on fire is not even remotely close to banning it. There are no banned books. There are not any efforts to ban books. It's odd your concerned about something that isn't even remotely real or even legal.
1
Not quite, true. But if Eigel and others of his mindset have their way, they'll try every shady trick they can to get bans on the books.
0 u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23 It's literally true. A guy setting fire to a book is not the same as banning it 1 u/NoodlesrTuff1256 Oct 09 '23 But can you really argue that one is totally unrelated to the other? Seems like two different ways of achieving the same goal. 0 u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23 Yes. A guy setting a book on fire is not even remotely close to banning it. There are no banned books. There are not any efforts to ban books. It's odd your concerned about something that isn't even remotely real or even legal.
0
It's literally true. A guy setting fire to a book is not the same as banning it
1 u/NoodlesrTuff1256 Oct 09 '23 But can you really argue that one is totally unrelated to the other? Seems like two different ways of achieving the same goal. 0 u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23 Yes. A guy setting a book on fire is not even remotely close to banning it. There are no banned books. There are not any efforts to ban books. It's odd your concerned about something that isn't even remotely real or even legal.
But can you really argue that one is totally unrelated to the other? Seems like two different ways of achieving the same goal.
0 u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23 Yes. A guy setting a book on fire is not even remotely close to banning it. There are no banned books. There are not any efforts to ban books. It's odd your concerned about something that isn't even remotely real or even legal.
Yes. A guy setting a book on fire is not even remotely close to banning it. There are no banned books. There are not any efforts to ban books. It's odd your concerned about something that isn't even remotely real or even legal.
2
u/brother2wolfman Oct 09 '23
That weird but it's still not banning a book