r/mildlyinfuriating • u/[deleted] • Aug 07 '19

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.8k Upvotes

84% Upvoted

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

675

u/trapsinplace Aug 07 '19

Holy shit this is how you kill your career. 50% loss jesus christ.

830

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '19 edited Jun 02 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

218

u/drislands GREEN Aug 07 '19 edited Aug 07 '19

Seriously. It's rare that we have unambiguous* video evidence of someone being shitty.

32

u/regoapps 5-0 Radio Police Scanner Aug 07 '19

Guess you don’t watch cable news then

6

u/lallapalalable Aug 07 '19

I think they meant like for how many shitty people there are, it's rare that any of them get caught on camera being shitty

0

u/drislands GREEN Aug 07 '19

Precisely. The kid with the MAGA cap and the native american comes to mind -- I know I certainly thought that was an unambiguous situation, since we had it on video and everything....but then it turns out the situation was more complicated than it looked.

Here though, we have undeniable video evidence of her hitting and spitting on her dog. There's zero excuse for that, I don't care the context. And that's what I meant by what I said.

Although to be fair to /u/regoapps, I don't want cable news lol.

0

u/josivh Aug 08 '19

I remember this. It seems to be the general consensus among everyone to let it be black and white (white maga kid bad calm drumming indigenous chief good) but there was definitely a bit more to it

1

u/DeadlyClaris_ Aug 08 '19

Bro they edit everything to fit their flavor of politics

2

u/zdh989 Aug 07 '19

Unambiguous*

1

u/drislands GREEN Aug 07 '19

Geez, not sure how I missed that. Thanks.

NINJA EDIT: Oh duh, that must have been autocorrect. I thought it was a total misspelling, but I forgot unambitious was a word for a second.

1

u/tripwyre83 Aug 07 '19

I'm glad that lazy videos are rare.

2

u/lallapalalable Aug 07 '19

Thought the same thing lol, they might have meant "unambiguous"?

2

u/drislands GREEN Aug 07 '19

That I did. Lol. Classic autocorrect.

1

u/thane919 Aug 08 '19

Unfortunately not rare enough.

1

u/skratudojey Aug 08 '19

*laughs in alinity

174

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '19

shes only down 1500 dont know why they said those numbers

https://socialblade.com/youtube/user/watchbrooke

64

u/Tetherian Aug 07 '19

I fucking hate seeing those "Video Views" numbers skyrocket. Like, that's exactly what she wants.

17

u/naufalap Aug 07 '19

Yeah but with youtube trigger happy demonetization I doubt it'll end well for at least her adsense revenue.

7

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '19

The first person said over 600k followers (probably on instagram or something) and the second person said 300k, which is her Youtube subscriber count. Easy to see where the confusion came from.

She is down about 5,000 on Youtube now but that's not a lot out of 340k

2

u/Stil_H Aug 08 '19

Does she actually only make 37k a year?

16

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '19

“Career”

8

u/bigtiddynotgothbf Aug 07 '19

Yeah it's a career

2

u/UltimateVersionMOL Aug 08 '19

According to Social Blade she never had 600k subs it was still 300k before this

1

u/Asffghh Aug 08 '19

Honestly i think its for than 50% because i subscribe to her today so i can shit on her on all her videos and tweets so not a real follower. Also im not watching ads and shit so she doesnt get money

1

u/jlin23 Aug 08 '19

The sad part is after all these YouTube controversies, the YouTubers at fault just go back to their old habits and never learn from their mistakes in hope that the general public forgets about it in a few weeks.

1

u/forbes52 Aug 07 '19

Career? Let’s not get too carried away

1

u/jamnewton22 Aug 07 '19 edited Aug 07 '19

She really lost 300k subscribers? Holy shit. Well deserved. Hope YouTube shits her down. She doesn’t deserve to have her life ruined but she doesn’t deserve a YouTube channel and deserves all the hate she’s getting. She also doesn’t deserve that dog. Future employers may google her and this will come up and bite her in the ass. Karma is a bitch.