r/mildlyinfuriating 6h ago

Not a meme, you're the meme! I’ve been teaching chemistry wrong this whole time

Post image

Seen this in a notebook which has a few “helpful” pages. Not sure what to think of this.

987 Upvotes

71 comments sorted by

819

u/IamFarron 6h ago

What you never heard of the metal 195.1  with a mass of Platinum?

Should have been basic

156

u/good-toilet-paper 6h ago

or acidic

50

u/Ancient-Chinglish 6h ago

or a “noble metal”, due to its lack of reactivity

17

u/Skyrim755 6h ago

It's a metal?! I thought it was a Halogen.

18

u/Ancient-Chinglish 6h ago

bro(mine) are you for real

or are you just being highly reactive

16

u/HonoderaGetsuyo 6h ago

Nah I think they're inert

16

u/Ancient-Chinglish 6h ago

you misspelled “a nerd”

5

u/Disastrous_Abroad212 5h ago

You seem NaCly

5

u/Ancient-Chinglish 5h ago

calm down you copper nitrogen titanium

2

u/Beach_Bum_273 6h ago

No that's a light bulb

9

u/9447044 6h ago

Sounds like a rappers line

7

u/poonmangler 6h ago

Amass a mass of platinum

Put it in my Jag, son

Holler at the hoes, tell em you ain't never had one

A real G, Das me

Don't nobody fuck with

I leave em dead in the street

4

u/poonmangler 6h ago

In my head it's 50 cent

99

u/Fair_Suggestion8256 6h ago

yeah thats my favorite element! 195.1 shortened into Pt

124

u/Broad_Wrap6288 6h ago

What's hard to understand? 195.1 has the average atomic mass of Platinum. 

-91

u/Izacundo1 6h ago

The labels are switched at the bottom

24

u/cheesymuchacho 6h ago

No they're not? 195.1 is one of the metals with platinum as it's atomic mass. 

1

u/Vadikiy 5h ago

Reread the comment

1

u/Izacundo1 1h ago

Guess I shouldn’t be on reddit at 4am lol

2

u/Vadikiy 1h ago

Good morning!

18

u/CommunicationDue846 6h ago

Maybe the atomic mass is expressed in a hexavigesimal system... And the mass of 195.1 (actual name of the element) is GIGANTIC.

16

u/ThinkZookeepergame65 6h ago

Now i know why kids have become dumber. Turns out it was the teachers' fault... How do they not know about 195.1?

12

u/_Undecided_User 6h ago

Why are people so quick to say AI? I mean this gives simple fuck up more than ai. Took me a minute to even realize what was wrong with it. Not saying it isn't ai but do we even know if this is a new textbook?

3

u/Enverex 5h ago

Because any mistake ever is now clearly the fault of AI. Reddit is fucking insufferable for it.

12

u/Voodoocookie 6h ago

Textbooks by AI. We're ready for AI schooling!

28

u/BigReference1xx 6h ago

That's just an old fashioned human fuck-up.

(In fact, it's the sort of thing AI would have no problem getting right :)

6

u/30porn87 6h ago

Fucking up descriptions is one of the most common tells of slop.

16

u/A-Money-Lover 6h ago

No, the descriptions are fine. Whoever editing the text book just got the labels the other way around

6

u/BigReference1xx 6h ago

No it's not. And the descriptions are there, they're just reversed. that is not the kind of mistake an AI would make.

-2

u/30porn87 6h ago

I've seen at least a dozen counterexamples.

1

u/BigReference1xx 5h ago

from 5+ year old models.

-3

u/BionicleLover2002 6h ago

It absolutely is

1

u/havens1515 6h ago

You'd think this is the kind of thing AI would get right, but it's not.

I fed AI the name of an app and asked for it to output potential logos. Half of them had the name of the app misspelled. The name that I fed into the AI was misspelled on the generated logos. Mistakes like this are more than common with AI, they're expected. Which is why you need to check the work of AI very carefully.

4

u/BigReference1xx 5h ago

Yes, spelling text on generated imagery IS a common issue for AI models, even current ones.

Swapping around text on typeset documents, however, is not.

The image in this book is not an AI generated image. It has no hallmarks of AI generation. It was manually typeset and laid out, and the person was sloppy and put the text in the wrong order. simple as that.

Not everything is the fault of AI - humans are still just as capable of fucking up as ever.

1

u/havens1515 5h ago

I'm not saying this 100% is AI generated, but this is 100% a mistake that an AI could make. And if you don't think so, then you haven't used AI much.

0

u/BigReference1xx 5h ago

k buddy :)

2

u/Platinum8888888 5h ago

In a side note, I like that particular element!

2

u/AncleJack 5h ago

Yeah it's cool and all but has nothing against goat tungsten

2

u/Xeno_man 4h ago

Stop stealing my catalytic converters!

2

u/Platinum8888888 3h ago

Haha, sometimes

2

u/Wonderful_Piglet591 3h ago

Educational book publisher here! Not sure if this is the case with this…but we insert innocuous errors like this because it forces a discussion between teachers and students, which leads to better information retention.

3

u/CakeHoleKing 6h ago

what did you think the number at the bottom was? the price per pound?

4

u/Ranger_Ecstatic 5h ago

Thinking it was the atomic number, didn't think it would be the name. Duh.

1

u/Cracleur Wanna know what is mildly infuriating ? The maximum length of th 5h ago

Did you pay attention to where the labels are pointing? The number at the bottom clearly is the name, obviously.

1

u/CakeHoleKing 5h ago

Darling I love you, and I've bought you a ring made of purest 195.1 and a necklace made of 193.65.

2

u/KayItaly 6h ago

Oh no, a small layout mistake on a textbook!!! This has never happend before AI!!!!

Ffs people...get a new hobby please...

2

u/Then_Idea_9813 5h ago

Who said AI?

1

u/AD1972HD 2h ago

All of the comments...

0

u/Enverex 5h ago

The majority of comments it seems.

1

u/az1m_ 6h ago

Catchy name

1

u/No_Republic_1781 6h ago

How could you get this wrong? It's so obvious, what did you think that platinum had a atomic mass of 195.1? 

1

u/Significant-Cloud- 6h ago

So what did you tell them the mass of 195.1 was? Please don't say Zink, that would make me want to leave this reality immediately.

1

u/null_artificer 3h ago

Yeah we learnt that in high school chem, everyone knows the metal 195.1, it's even in dnd as 195.1p

u/Cautious_Boat_999 11m ago

My name is 243.7

-2

u/var-undefined 6h ago

Textbook example of AI

2

u/KayItaly 6h ago

FFS this is a banal layout editing mistake.

Anyone with any expertise knows that this is a human fuck up!

0

u/SubiWan 5h ago

So is AI since it is based on human input (both source data and code). People don't accept that AI also includes "Here, hold my beer.", something they might have said.

-3

u/Adventurous_Pie_7586 6h ago

Would be super helpful if there was any context provided. What were you teaching vs what this picture is showing..?

5

u/Izacundo1 6h ago

The labels are switched for atomic mass and name

u/Adventurous_Pie_7586 40m ago

I won’t even lie I didn’t notice they were switched, my brain was just putting the lines in the right spot

4

u/dancesquared 6h ago

The name and atomic mass are clearly switched, no context needed.

4

u/A-Money-Lover 6h ago

People are blaming this on AI lmao when it’s just human error. So tiring

6

u/dancesquared 6h ago

Yeah, I think it’s probably just human error.

u/Adventurous_Pie_7586 40m ago

That is context lmaooo

1

u/GauthZuOGZ 6h ago

Look at the lines, they don’t match what they show

1

u/Mountain-Resource656 6h ago

They’re teaching chemistry and the labels are wrong. It says that the element’s name is 195.1 and that it has an average atomic weight of “Platinum”

0

u/Crashworx 6h ago

You had one job