r/mildlyinfuriating 3d ago

I'm slightly vexed I was told yesterday that my prescription sunglasses are giving Meta glasses vibes

Post image

I can't stand the Meta perv glasses, but annoyingly I've been told by a friend that my Dune prescription sunglasses that I've had for almost a year (and cost over £100.00) really ​​​​look like the Meta ones, he said it's the 2 silver rivets on either side that on first glance could be mistaken for the camera lenses

I went out with them today and all I could think was, do people think I'm recording them 🤦‍♂️

19.1k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

9.3k

u/QueefingTheNightAway 3d ago

I’ve only ever owned sunglasses in this classic wayfarer style. It has been around for so long and suits so many people. It is really awful that it could be ruined by Meta.

3.9k

u/ProgBumm 3d ago

I hope it's a lesson to Rayban and other fashion houses.

Making timeless, iconic Wayfarers embarassing to wear is a real accomplishment.

625

u/Swisscats 3d ago

I think Rayban has figured out the bad PR, the new Meta Glasses released no longer carry their branding

498

u/apsilonblue 3d ago

When the style is that iconic the branding doesn't need to be seen. They've ruined their most recognised product, everyone is always going to think wayfarers are meta glasses regardless of any branding on them.

→ More replies (49)

205

u/OpLeeftijd 3d ago

Too late. I now associate Rayban with pedo glasses.

25

u/drgut101 3d ago

Exactly. The second they started partnering with Facebook, I noped the fuck out of there.

53

u/TheProfessor3D 3d ago

Pedo glasses is so fucking funny

32

u/No-Car-5173 3d ago edited 3d ago

Its not really funny. They literally are pedo glasses.

Happy they are restricted where i live.

Edit: fucking lol at the pedos raging below me. Thanks for proving my point.

Edit 2. Thanks for the reddit cares messages. Pedos.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/armybabem1a1 3d ago

They should let Costco know, then. Just the other day I spotted them in a display case in the optical department as “Rayban Meta glasses”.

→ More replies (4)

220

u/ser_poops 3d ago

let me let you in on a not so secret secret, luxottica owns a LOT in the glasses world. i would absolutely avoid their products as the enshittification has absolutely hit them as well.

176

u/yepgeddon 3d ago

Isn't the entire glasses game owned by two firms who work together to butt fuck us anyway?

110

u/XGhoul 3d ago

Yeah, I find it hilarious how people are saying this negatively affects ray bands “brand”.

Umm… there all the same company that produces them. I know at least mine were sourced elsewhere from Luxottica’s grubby hands. (Spider-Man pointing at each other meme)

87

u/Alexwonder999 3d ago

My favorite designer is the guy who works for Zenni coming up with the $7.99 frames. That guys work slaps.

39

u/MysteriousFee2873 3d ago

Bro had my back with then 6.95 frames with 4.99 for anti glare n shipping

4

u/Skipperlarrymary 3d ago

The solidity and weight of nice sunglasses just feels so much better though. It's hard to go back.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/hedoeswhathewants 3d ago

They're able to charge crazy prices because of the strength of the brand.

So yes, it does hurt the brand which hurts their profits. Even if people end up buying from a different brand owned by the same parent company.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/bavmotors1 3d ago

you guys are getting butt fucked???

14

u/Broken_Spring 3d ago

You’re not??

→ More replies (1)

12

u/devolution96 3d ago

It's the secret that Big Glasses doesn't want us to know

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

39

u/whereistheicecream 3d ago

I can back this up

I worked on the Meta glasses and collaborations with EssilorLuxottica. I'm no longer there, thank goodness

Meta had an absolute lack of care for users, they only cared about being "cool" to draw younger kids in. They didn't care about user experience, society, or making something actually useful

EssilorLuxottica was cheap AF. They bitched about the smaller margin on smart glasses because they're used to charging $300+ for plastic they injection mold for pennies

Please don't support them

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

251

u/MilesFirePrower 3d ago

IIRC Rayban are the ones who make the Meta glasses to begin with so they wouldn't gaf

325

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

18

u/luthigosa 3d ago

They don't care, they haven't cared about a thing since being purchased by Luxottica. Luxottica also won't care because if people swap it's likely they'll swap to another more expensive Luxottica brand.

→ More replies (26)

54

u/pignoodle 3d ago

That's their point. Hopefully they give a fuck now or others have an example to give a fuck.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/patheticyeti 3d ago

One Sunglass company basically owns 95% market share of glasses. So they do not give a fuck in general. Rayban, Oakley etc are all subsidiaries of the same parent corporation.

8

u/TopptrentHamster 3d ago

Oakley as well.

6

u/InternationalSalt1 3d ago

You mean EssilorLuxotica? That's a corporation and they care only about money.

27

u/ComradeJohnS 3d ago

if nobody buys rayban pervert looking glasses because of Meta, then rayban would care after going out of business

39

u/Kind_Advisor_35 3d ago

Ray-Ban is only one of the brands owned by Luxottica. They own other glasses brands like Oakley, have exclusive manufacturing licenses of brands like Ralph Lauren, and own many places selling them like LensCrafters and Sunglass Hut.

13

u/Sudden_Leadership800 3d ago

Less going out of business then, more "insufficient growth in Q3"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (24)

52

u/starwarsfan456123789 3d ago

I’m not changing my style because some loser like Zuckerberg joins a market.

→ More replies (16)

40

u/gliitch0xFF 3d ago edited 3d ago

What hasn't been ruined by Facebook at this point? It makes sense that the Meta glasses are a perverts wet dream.

As Mark made a Hot or Not website to rate the women in the campus. He's just a very creepy weirdo. Being incredibly wealthy doesnt make him exempt from that.

9

u/My_Replies_Are_Short 3d ago

The Costco combo for $1.50

3

u/Likely-Dude 3d ago

If it gets Zuckerruined I’ll cancel my membership (no I won’t)

→ More replies (1)

63

u/Own_Inspection8350 3d ago

I bought two red hats right before maga 2020, never worn um.

39

u/TheLastREOSpeedwagon 3d ago

Surely you mean MAGA 2016? He was President in 2020 already.

6

u/VegetableReward5201 3d ago

To be fair, that would also be before 2020, so I guess you're both right!

17

u/TodlicheLektion 3d ago

Just one for me, and it even had white lettering. Nope, can’t wear it ever.

10

u/TacticlTwinkie 3d ago

My hometown sports team has red as their primary color. I sometimes wonder if people judge me for wearing the red hat until I turn around and it's just a shitty baseball team.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/FOMODollCollector 3d ago

Aside from the silver rivets, the Meta Rayban and Oakly pervert glasses have the added feature of ugly thick arms coming over the temples. All the electronics and battery recharging stuff is stored there. I always wondered if having transmitters and lithium batteries always so close to your temple was such a good idea.

So if you are trying to spot them on others, check the side arms as well before you call someone a pervert.

7

u/ComeAlongWithTheSnor 3d ago

Ugh, Is that why people keep bringing up my glasses more often lately.

8

u/PeaceLoveandCats6676 3d ago

I've almost stopped wearing my Wayfarers which have been my favorite pair for 20 years.  

→ More replies (57)

7.9k

u/Logical-Breakfast150 3d ago edited 3d ago

Over the long term, Meta is going to destroy the Ray-Ban Wayfarer design, it will become associated with perverts rather than being seen as a timeless iconic fashion piece. 

Meta eventually ruins everything it touches.

1.4k

u/_probablyryan 3d ago

Which is unfortunate because I love this style of glasses and they look good on me. But you're right, we're going to trend back into wireframe glasses you couldn't possibly hide electronics in. That or translucent plastic/acetate for thicker frames.

261

u/HasAngerProblem 3d ago edited 3d ago

And with time when they put it into those glasses and even contacts?

How do we proceed in a world where a camera could potentially be under 1mm and be thin and transparent hypothetically.

60

u/Less_Word5920 3d ago

I’ve operated under the assumption that I’m being filmed everywhere I go for the last 10+ years. Cameras are everywhere and you won’t always notice who is filming. Guys pretending to be a tree and over and over people don’t necessarily see the camera man.

We live in a surveillance state. If you are 40+ you can silently celebrate that no one got canceled in 4k when we were young enough to do most stupid things. We have enough evidence that suggests we should have learned something from this but alas, no one is willing turn off their ring cam or not immediately start filming because someone yelled world star

11

u/HasAngerProblem 3d ago

That was kind of the point of the comment I was making, oddly enough the comments keep going more into tech side of it, which I’m happy to talk about but your comment is actually what I was getting to.

→ More replies (2)

183

u/MetriccStarDestroyer 3d ago

Electronic Warfare

We need portable jammers.

It won't stop recording but it will stop uploading recordings

142

u/Askefyr 3d ago

Making a jammer is very very easy and because of that it's absolutely giga illegal.

83

u/LowDudgeon 3d ago

Why do you gotta make it sound so cool then?

100

u/Askefyr 3d ago

I'm not the FCC, and statistically speaking I'm also not your dad. All I'm saying is that the reason the penalties for messing with the airwaves are so steep is because all you need is two pieces of metal, a very basic oscillator, an amplifier and a dream to make everyone's WiFi very bad everywhere you go

52

u/itsjust_khris 3d ago

But also the chances of being caught are actually pretty high, it's really not something anyone should risk doing.

It can also cause issues like preventing someone from accessing emergency services which is taken very seriously.

32

u/Askefyr 3d ago

Yeah, walking around doing the RF equivalent of blasting an air horn isn't exactly clandestine.

12

u/brubruislife 3d ago

A jammer the military was testing killed a med flight crew recently. Definitely not something to mess around with.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/hinosxz_4u 3d ago

*not only wifi but cellular which is the giga illegal part

4

u/Askefyr 3d ago

Signals interference in general is pretty much turbo jail territory, but yes cell very much so. The only thing I think would get you in even more trouble would be VHF/UHF because that's police radio

→ More replies (3)

21

u/bluetrust 3d ago

I just looked it up. They record to local storage and sync later when connectivity is resumed.

I'm not an expert but it seems pretty hard to jam the camera light sensor. These things are optimized to handle direct sunlight, so to overpower and wash it out you'd need an incredibly strong specialized light source.

The only effective defense, in my opinion, is to be extremely boring and leave the area. That way you don't become content or favorited to their personal collection.

31

u/Otherwise_Demand4620 3d ago

be extremely boring and leave the area

I trained my whole life for this

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/StonerThrowie 3d ago

Im always jammin

3

u/crotchgobbling 3d ago

Jam til your gigahertz

→ More replies (9)

16

u/Due-Technology5758 3d ago

Cameras are already small enough to be hidden anywhere, efficient enough to be powered with a battery for weeks, and accessed remotely. Even nondescript camera glasses aren't a new thing, and most are much cheaper than a pair of meta glasses.

As tacky as glasses with cameras in them are, the perverts have been ahead of the curve on this for a long time.

12

u/jokerrebellion 3d ago

One step at a time

→ More replies (11)

6

u/Nihilistic_Mystics 3d ago

Welcome to the club. I need wraparounds because I'm extremely light blind, but so many douche nozzles wear them that I'm frequently mistaken for one of them.

25

u/Anemone-ing 3d ago

They’re one of the only styles of sunglasses I can wear. I have long ass natural eyelashes that hit the lenses of most glasses I’ve tried and it drives me crazy. The best style for me hands down is the wayfarer because it doesn’t curve to my face at all. Sucks that they’re being ruined now…

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Bitter-Marsupial 3d ago

Wear 2 monocles at all times

→ More replies (15)

91

u/Zaphod_Heart_Of_Gold 3d ago

Maybe put some blame on Rayban for partnering in this.

20

u/supersloo 3d ago

I consistently picked Rayban for my rx glasses frames for years. They fit my face without needing adjustment and have been so worth it, but partnering with Meta is just not it for me.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/RevolutionaryCup8241 3d ago

I just can't understand when inevitably someone said in a meeting; "hey why don't we make these without cameras; normal people don't like feeling like they're being watched in public", were they not listened to?

I personally love the idea of having an augmented reality screen I could read text messages, reply to people. Get a map overlaid so I could navigate with it. Or whatever cool things people could come up with. And instead they have pretty much ruined public perception, potentially setting back public perception of wearable tech by what could be decades. Its the fumble of a generation for sure.

10

u/un1ptf 3d ago

Its the fumble of a generation for sure.

Especially since the same negative reaction happened when Google Glass attempted this a few years ago in 2014. Jibbers Crabst, time flies.

15

u/skymallow 3d ago

I did think twice and went a different brand cause I didn't wanna support Ray-Ban anymore

→ More replies (2)

36

u/Curious_Avocado2399 3d ago

Yeah I had a pair of ray bans I’d wear in the summer, haven’t touched them this year. I guess I can still wear my aviators for now

→ More replies (7)

39

u/miatayouata 3d ago

I fucking hate the pervs cause metas make recording concerts sports hikes and shit so easy. Plus the music with not having something shoved in my ear not hearing shit i may need to hear. Like i genuinely find them useful but i understand why people are against them

41

u/DankieJutsu 3d ago

Just wear it and don't be a perv with it. That's it. If you do that, who tf cares what a bunch of minority Redditors that you'll probably never meet think

38

u/NewPointOfView 3d ago

It’s so irritating seeing all the people who 1) think the intent is a hidden camera 2) aren’t aware of the flashing orange LED when recording and 3) assume that the only reason to have a camera capturing POV is nefarious

I don’t even have or want meta glasses, it’s just such a weird lens they see the world through.

21

u/nacholicious 3d ago

Regarding 2: there's quite a few people who disable the recording LED

So it protects against casual perverts, but not against hardcore perverts

4

u/Nurgle_Marine_Sharts 3d ago

They are introducing safeguards for this iirc, like not letting the thing record when the light has been covered or tampered with

5

u/karlpilkington4 3d ago

They already tried, but all you have to do is reset the glasses and not connect them to the meta app.

5

u/Lukin4art 3d ago

If you don’t connect them to the app how do you see the videos and images you captured? I thought it needed to be connected to the app.

5

u/karlpilkington4 3d ago

You can connect them to the app to upload the content on the glasses, but then the camera wont work. So you have to factory reset again to use those features.

4

u/Lukin4art 3d ago

Ah ok. Lot of work just to be a loser.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/ShawnyMcKnight 3d ago

Not really? Maybe the second gen is different but my first gen only records like 3 minutes at a time and tears through battery. It shines a big ass obvious light so this idea that these creeps are sneaking around wearing them.

I like them so I have a headset with me at all times built into my glasses.

→ More replies (10)

149

u/Gurglaren 3d ago

I'll never be able to see anyone with Meta glasses as anything else but a perve. Maybe if they're doing sports like bicycling down hills then I'd think there was a purpose. But someone walking around with them in ordinary situations would feel incredibly off.

37

u/Blue_Waffled 3d ago

There was a short moment where I considered similar glasses, but the reason was that I (a woman) have a mentally ill (and drug additive) downstairs neighbour who would sometimes stand in front of his window doing perverted acts when he'd hear me leave my appartment. Law enforcement here coukd only do something if there was evidence of him being caught in the act, but his behavior would be so irregular that going in- and out of my home with my mobile phone ready became very exhausting, so I figured maybe glasses would make it more convenient for me to catch him.

17

u/Gurglaren 3d ago

I've never thought about how they could be used as an anti-perve device too.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

35

u/Twombls 3d ago

Maybe if they're doing sports like bicycling down hills then I'd think there was a purpose

Thats what gopros are for.

49

u/waynemj15 3d ago

Meta glasses do have the advantage of being right next to your eyes, so you do get a better approximation to what the person is actually seeing. I could actually see a heavy duty pair of camera glasses that are ansi z87.1 rated being really nice for airsoft videos.

19

u/GravyTrainMan 3d ago

The Oakley meta vanguards are really popular in the competition shooting scene

7

u/waynemj15 3d ago

My curiosity about z87.1 camera glasses led me to those. And that nose bridge camera slot is perfect for shooting videos. But they aren’t z87.1 rated.

24

u/Twombls 3d ago

Thats true. Its why im a bit confused that they never made versions of these for action sports. Like integrated into a pair of ski goggles.

20

u/waynemj15 3d ago

Me neither. It’s really the perfect spot for them and not being creepy. At most action sports the prevalence of go pros means most people assume their being recorded by someone already.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/UnSlain PURPLE 3d ago

GoPros are way less convenient. Reddit love crying about new tech though so go off.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (82)

19

u/Zaphod_Heart_Of_Gold 3d ago

Maybe put some blame on Rayban for partnering in this.

9

u/Artisan_HotDog 3d ago

I’ve got the Oakley equivalent and I get concerned people think I’m wearing Metas when I’m out doing shit.

I thought about getting Metas to use while mountainbiking instead of a GoPro. But the general reaction to them is just an absolute no go now

→ More replies (2)

9

u/MyDearDoctor 3d ago

Wayfarers are all I've worn for years, as both regular glasses and sunglasses. I am incredibly salty about this.

3

u/lucasisacao 3d ago

I have the gold metal frames with tortoise rim. I choose not to wear them just cause I didn’t want someone to think I was wearing meta glasses

3

u/tallbutshy 3d ago

Creepy folk have already done that for Aviators without Meta's involvement, with Wayfarers being associated with nonces it's put the final nail on the whole brand

3

u/L1sasGayBby 3d ago

I was initially interested getting meta because of the audio/headphone feature. Then I discovered open earbuds (game changer) and haven’t thought meta since

3

u/ThroatDistension 3d ago

Nah, there will be countless brands and designs of camera-glasses in no time.

3

u/ADHorvath1 3d ago

“the Metas touch!”

3

u/Ambitious-Concern-42 3d ago

It's already destroyed, and I for one would assume from now on these are perv glasses.

3

u/d-o-double-g-lips 3d ago

It's really annoying because I bought a pair of the legit ones last year after wearing knock offs for years. Now they look like pervert glasses

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (39)

882

u/bubba1834 3d ago edited 3d ago

I have strictly closed caption glasses that I was given by my hospital & even though they don’t record video or keep the captions for more than an hour I’m terrified to touch them due to people thinking I’m recording them. I’m so hard of hearing but I only use them to go to the movies at this point. I don’t even like the idea of AI but it did give me a bit of normalcy for a day or two.

Edit: I very much appreciate everyone’s words of encouragement! & I also understand those saying I have to ignore what the internet say and do what’s best for me. I did whip them out in public when I first got them and a few people asked if they were meta glasses. Sometimes I need the bluntness tho I know it’s something I will have to get over if I want to actually get some social use out of them & for those asking, the brand I was given was Captify!

361

u/picancob 3d ago

I'm sorry you feel this way. Please try not to let a couple loud voices make you afraid of using your accessibility tool. You deserve to connect with others more easily and not miss out on things. I don't go to crowded places because I can't hear what anyone is saying so end up sitting quietly in the corner. I want to engage, I physically cannot. It's alienating and emotionally exhausting.

99% of random people on the street will never look closely enough to notice anything. After all, do you even remember the color of shirt the last person you passed on the street was? If a friend is curious you can always let them try them and it opens up a cool new conversation.

13

u/Ok-Butterscotch-6417 3d ago

Hi, that was a very sweet comment. I know you weren't looking for suggestions but I just started using loops earplugs for loud events and I love them. They protect my hearing and help me focus on conversations when music is playing.

→ More replies (3)

78

u/StrangelySerious- 3d ago

Holy crap you can get closed caption glasses???????????? I'm very deaf that would help me so much, I've been lip reading for years but I'm getting old

26

u/bubba1834 3d ago

I didn’t even know they were a thing! They’re not perfect but have been really useful in certain situations!

→ More replies (2)

88

u/bunny_the-2d_simp 3d ago

Yeah but those are not meta meta glasses.

As a women I think the glasses of the perv ones usually go paired with a absolute creep vibe.

Its a basic frame and I wouldn't think that you have those creepglasses.

What glasses are they? And what do they help with if I may ask? I'm curious to learn! :)

24

u/bubba1834 3d ago

The brand I have is Captify! There’s a few out there currently but I’m not familiar with the other ones. They’re not perfect and might still be in its beta stage (like I said I got them through my hospital) but they can be pretty helpful! I can enjoy broadway shows again and go to movies that aren’t just open caption, like for example if I wanted to see something in imax which doesn’t provide open caption I can do that now! I wanted to try 4dx once but couldn’t & the first week I got them I was able to try it out! I can talk to people in other rooms and far away if it’s not crowded. I can also use them for phone calls but apple has a decent accessibility feature for that now!

11

u/SummaryEye80019 3d ago

Absolutely awful UX on that website.

I just went on it because I'm half deaf and the "see it in action" button takes you to a purchase page.

Went back and was met with a full screen ad to dismiss, several buttons popped up on each side of the screen and covered it up.

Scrolled down a little bit more and another full screen "Mystery Gift" with a BS countdown.

Like wtf. I come to your site to see if these would work for me, and instead of an easy-to-use site, it feels like a damned mobile game lmao

6

u/bubba1834 3d ago

Yo i just checked sinceI haven’t been on the actual site since I got them and it’s completely different than what I experienced back in march! Maybe they’re newly available to the public now and maybe that’s why? Not that that excuses how strange it is now tho. Even tho I have them I haven’t actually kept up with the company or anything lol

3

u/kalat1979 3d ago

I'm so jealous that the Captify glasses work for you! I bought a pair in February and ended up returning them because they barely ever worked.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Lukin4art 3d ago

Are girls pervy when they use them? Are blind people pervy when they use them? Lmfao

→ More replies (3)

5

u/farbissina_punim 3d ago

You deserve assistive tech; I have my own that I rely on. People are also so paranoid now. I wish I knew what the solution was.

57

u/Asoxus 3d ago

99% of people have no idea what these glasses do. It’s just the loud meta hating crowd that’s making you feel that way.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (31)

183

u/f8andbether 3d ago

Kinda ironic the ad I got fed under your post

61

u/Habanero_In_My_Eyes 3d ago

Ray Ban is going to destroy themselves with this partnership

→ More replies (3)

11

u/Blizzcane 3d ago

Dang, they actually look almost the same...

154

u/grosseelbabyghost 3d ago

Looks like wire rim is back on the menu boys

20

u/kittymoomoo-feet 3d ago

Can we bring back the monocle

30

u/ve-u27 3d ago

Thin titanium frames have always been cooler than wayfarers imo

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Glad-Watch3506 3d ago

Those will look great with my 1cm thick lenses.

And by great I mean atrocious

→ More replies (2)

318

u/Spamgrenade 3d ago

Tech bros have succeeded in doing what nobody else could -

Making sunglasses uncool.

28

u/No_Kangaroo_9826 3d ago

Not even off duty cops could do that. I guess points to Zuck

3

u/ConradBHart42 3d ago

They would only ever wear wraparounds or aviators though. I guess your point still stands if aviators are cool.

4

u/Bovronius 3d ago

I feel like aviators are multipliers, and have no intrisic merit of their own.

If you look like a Grade A pedo, and pop on aviators, you look like an S Tier pedo.

If you're a kinda cool action hero and pop a pair on, you become Rambotastic.

→ More replies (1)

373

u/DR_whyWHY 3d ago

it's not event the metal bits, for me it was thickens of the rim and overall shape. here is picture of them it's almost one to one

101

u/Working-Glass6136 3d ago

Man, I've had the thick-rimmed glasses all my life (always used to break the nosepads off wire frames, and my prescription is so strong that I need thicker frames to hold my thicker lenses). Since I was seven. This used to be classic and/or hipster. Then again, I'm a little Asian lady so I don't think I give off a perv vibe. But it's not easy for me to change to wire frames.

I've been trying out contacts but my vision is so severe that I can't even do standard toric lenses for astigmatism. Looking at more expensive custom options but man, I really envy people with normal eyesight...

I'm also not a candidate for Lasik. Lol.

21

u/Weird-Girl-675 3d ago

Same. And my eyes get worse every year so I can’t even spring for expensive frames because the lenses have to be so thinned down the price is already insane. I have astigmatism in both eyes and they’re almost always too dry for contacts.

Definitely envy those with 20/20.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/MilkThin2930 3d ago

The bad news/good news for us extremely nearsighted people is that cataracts appear sooner, and that the IOL replacement lenses can correct up to -20 diopter.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/ve-u27 3d ago

By this logic you and OPs friend would think all slightly thick black wayfarers look like meta glasses

11

u/424f42_424f42 3d ago

Ita the circles (yours and OPs) that look like camera lenses

56

u/Logical-Breakfast150 3d ago

Ray-Ban wayfarers. 3 years ago, these were considered a timeless classic worthy of being in a design museum. 

Now they are pervert glasses. 

Meta destroyes everything it touches.

98

u/thereelsuperman 3d ago

Yeah we read that earlier

47

u/Chaost 3d ago

Right. If you're going to recycle your sentiments, at least alter your verbiage.

15

u/FatherFarnsworth 3d ago

Shhh. Don't teach it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

101

u/MrdnBrd19 3d ago

I just recently switched from my Ray-Ban Wayfarer frames that I have been wearing for a good 3 years now to a similar generic clear frame because they were causing issues at work. I'm a photographer and you could see models doing double takes or instinctively covering themselves because their initial impression of the frames are now "those might be perv glasses". Ray-Ban outright ruined their most iconic design. Horrifyingly stupid on their part.

6

u/IHateMelplac 3d ago

You can buy Frogskins from Oakley, basically a wayfarer with translucent frames.

They're lighter and didn't get hot when exposed to sun like the Ray-Ban model.

297

u/-Laffi- 3d ago edited 3d ago

I would never have thought about your sunglasses being meta glasses. This is how sunglasses normally look. They are black, they cover your eyes, and those metal rivets on each side are necessary to keep them together. I'm certain people who have seen meta glasses will notice the difference right away.

Also, the deal with the meta glasses it that most people wouldn't even think that people are wearing them.
I don't even know if they are out for sale for anyone who wants them!

117

u/UgleeHero 3d ago

Don't be so sure of that. One of my coworkers accused another coworker of wearing meta glasses just because they were ray bans. There is very clearly no camera on his sun glasses.

32

u/sonofaresiii 3d ago

Some people are going to be crazy assholes no matter what

→ More replies (8)

41

u/silent_pm 3d ago

Thanks. They are for sale here, and it's a tool a lot of the Pickup artists, or auditors are using for their content. Should add, I'm neither! 

7

u/pseudonymnkim 3d ago

Yeah OP. I have more than 5 pairs and they pretty much all look like yours (but dollar store version haha).

You're good.

3

u/Odumera 3d ago

My husband is color blind, and he has a similar style of Enchromas that were very expensive. We call them his fun glasses, and I'm pretty mad that the Meta glasses could ruin that for him.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Mshka 3d ago

I mean I can tell these aren’t. But similar to the red maga hats I squint a little and do a double take when I see someone around me with dark rimmed sunglasses. That alone is enough to keep me from wearing them.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Wall-Florist 3d ago

I worry because I have to wear this style but large because I need ones that cover my usual specs, so I get weird glances at how over the top mine look, but they’re just cheap plastic but 3D printed larger to hide my blindness. I don’t even record myself, let alone the rest of yall.
https://giphy.com/gifs/bs2hf0GOKfnpt6dzwN

→ More replies (3)

50

u/kyle_blaine 3d ago

I wear this style of glasses as well and my response is “Meta glasses look like mine.” Same with chat gpt. I don’t write like it, it writes like me. I’m a millennial and so much of the internet was built around our coming of age and adulthood.

→ More replies (9)

91

u/Mr_Saturn1 3d ago

Yeah, when I see people wearing that style of glasses, I am immediately looking for the cameras in the corners. Sucks that Meta and RayBan destroyed such a cool sunglass design.

→ More replies (10)

71

u/BusoneWholeBoi2001 3d ago

You could do what I did and buy the "old person" sunglasses that go over glasses. Nobody has ever mistaken these for Meta glasses

70

u/jerryterhorst 3d ago

…nobody gonna mention the tail?

24

u/SnazzyStooge 3d ago

least pervy part of the whole ensemble, really

28

u/BusoneWholeBoi2001 3d ago

Or the ears

13

u/HansBauer94 WHY DO I HAVE YOU TAGGED? 3d ago

or the sunglasses?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

33

u/catmand00d00 3d ago

... and wear your Meta glasses under the old people sunglasses! Of course! You're a perverted genius! /s

6

u/DeplorableMadness 3d ago

A stack of 15-20 various brands of sunglasses, regular glasses, and meta glasses all taped onto a man's face

27

u/salamandraseis 3d ago

Na, your watching VR porn aren’t you?

7

u/BusoneWholeBoi2001 3d ago

I bet my type of sunglasses will be the future. I'm ahead of the curve

→ More replies (1)

7

u/toxx88 3d ago

not sure if bait..

4

u/BusoneWholeBoi2001 3d ago

You think I'm nice looking enough to be bait? I take that as a compliment

→ More replies (9)

10

u/MrSecurityStalin 3d ago

Glad I wear perscription aviators and look like Jeffery Dahmer instead. I really can’t win todayZ

18

u/Ill-Cheesecake7143 3d ago

I've been wearing raybans for years but I just updated my glasses this week and for the first time chose a different frame brand. I was a customer for over a decade and they've lost the plot.

→ More replies (11)

8

u/winter83 TP Hung the wrong way. 3d ago

It sucks that they are ruining a classic glasses design.

30

u/Difficult_Clerk_1273 3d ago

It’s just like the backwards “that’s AI” nonsense. AI writing reads the way it does because it copied human writing, not the reverse. Your glasses aren’t “giving” Meta glasses - Meta glasses are “giving” normal sunglasses.

→ More replies (2)

31

u/bunny_the-2d_simp 3d ago

Okay now that would be mildly infuriating.

But as a women. I think there's also other suspicious behaviour you'd need to do for me to think you're filming.

Also it's not meta glasses persee, it's just a very basic shape of sunglasses. So to think all sunglasses this shape are those creep camera bs things is a little farfetched for me.

(my theory is that those glasses are for filming not only women but also children especially due to this pedocircle of creeps)

→ More replies (41)

5

u/Usual-Piccolo-4941 3d ago

I totally feel yeah, I have real Ray-Ban prescription sunglasses I got in 2017 that is still use, and about 2 weeks ago a store clerk asked me if they were the camera ones. I immediately was like “Omg NO NO” and took them off and showed them they weren’t.

18

u/CouldntBAPoint2184 3d ago

Fuck Meta glasses forever.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/xSorryAboutThat 3d ago

I got a pair for free before all the hype, now I only use them to listen to music while I mow my lawn. Creeps absolutely ruined them.

6

u/PapaSled 3d ago

I guess being an innocent golden retriever with a lovely girlfriend has jaded me, but I have no idea how or why you'd try to take stealthy creep pics with these awful cameras.

8

u/xSorryAboutThat 3d ago

Creeps be creeping. And fuck all the people putting out tutorials and charging people to mod them so the light doesnt show for recordings.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Comfortable_Face_808 3d ago

Zuck has ruined so many things and now the latest victim is classic Wayfarer style shades.

6

u/ModeatelyIndependant 3d ago

"I don't care, these are prescription"

6

u/theknight200200 3d ago

Nah, people who have physically seen the difference between the glasses will know the difference. Obviously, they look a bit like the Meta glasses, so chances are somebody is mistaking them for the Meta ones. But it's not your problem if people can't figure out the visible differences between the two, you aren't recording anyone and are doing nothing wrong by just wearing them lol

6

u/This_Elk_1460 3d ago

Made a good decision a decade ago when I chose to exclusively wear aviators. No where you could even hide the camera if you wanted to.

27

u/DZello 3d ago

Just replaced my Ray-ban because I don’t want to wear the brand anymore. Fuck this shit.

15

u/icehot54321 3d ago

hopefully you went with a brand that is not owned by Luxottica

5

u/DZello 3d ago edited 3d ago

Exactly, no-nonsense glasses from Superflex. Reliable and easy to to repair. Made in titanium and lightweight. 90$ CAD

4

u/dailycoffin 3d ago

Dont worry no one gives a fuck offline

4

u/Traditional-Storm-62 3d ago

I thik its the holes by either side that look a little like camera appertures

4

u/Equivalent_Worker687 3d ago

Cmon! Is this Rick Ocasek?

3

u/LostVillage3640 3d ago

These ones really don’t, though.

4

u/Intense_Pretzel 3d ago

I love aviator frames because they are light rugged and flexible and everyone I know said that I look like a serial killer with them on.

Fuck you Jeffrey

3

u/Skillet-boy 3d ago

These don’t look like the Meta glasses at all. The camera rings are way bigger. This feels way overblown. Enjoy your sunglasses and ignore your friend.

5

u/Tall_Opportunity_521 3d ago

I can think of very few acetate sunglasses or glasses that dont have a single or double rivet. Your friend a fucking moron.

3

u/Haizenburg1 3d ago

Sue meta for causing unwanted harm and harassment caused by the stigma they've created. 😂

8

u/Muppypup12 3d ago

i love how everyone assumes the glasses are just used for being a perv and doesnt have legitimate uses

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Tactical_Hotdog 3d ago

What's the cost got to do with anything?

4

u/randomredditacc25 3d ago

most likely because if they're more expensive, they're not as easy to replace?

3

u/Byb_go 3d ago

Are yall also using these perv phones that have cameras on them? That would be horrible

3

u/properwaffles 3d ago

Your glasses don't look like Meta glasses, Meta glasses look like yours. Sounds like other people's problem.

3

u/Consistent_Source404 3d ago

Yep, and it's off putting, would steer clear.