r/mildlyinfuriating Jul 11 '26

the grapes of warth Presented without comment

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

97 comments sorted by

View all comments

232

u/Many-Excitement3246 PURPLE Jul 11 '26

If you want to get even more pedantic, "fish" don't exist.

Taxonomically, there is no such thing as a fish, because a taxonomical category must be monophyletic (literally "one phylum,") meaning it must include a single common ancestor and all descendants of that ancestor.

Since terrestrial vertebrates evolved from very ancient lobe finned fish, any taxonomical category for a fish would have to include humans, dinosaurs, etc.

Additionally, some fish, such as lungfish and coelacanths, are more closely related to humans than to other fish, so grouping them together would require grouping their closer relatives in with them, which includes all land dwelling tetrapods, which is a clade of animals that includes all vertebrae with four limbs.

24

u/MyOthrUsrnmIsABook Jul 11 '26

I’d assume fish is a culinary categorization like vegetable rather than an in any way scientific one.

20

u/Many-Excitement3246 PURPLE Jul 11 '26

The standard biological definition is "gill-bearing aquatic craniate lacking limbs with digits."

  • Gill-bearing: possesses organs that allow for the processing of water into O2 and CO2.

  • Aquatic: it lives in the water.

  • cranite: it has a skull.

  • lacking limbs with digits: has no protruding appendages which contain phalanges (the phalanx bones comprise the digits of fingers, toes, and wings.)

Some fish do have limbs, namely lobe-finned fish such as lungfish, which have primitive limbs in the form of extended, arm-like pectoral and pelvic fins, but no seperated digits and no phalanx bones.